Google+ +1's on posts

Julian Bond 2011-2019 | Google+ Archive |  Home
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Academia, SchmacademiaSo there is that as well.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitSpectacular thread. Let us recall some Brexit promises. “There will be no downside to Brexit, only a considerable upside.” (David Davis, 10 October 2016) “Getting out of the EU can be quick and easy – the UK holds most of the cards.” (John Redwood, July 17 2016) “The free trade agreement that we will have to do with the European Union should be one of the easiest in human history.” (Liam Fox, 20 July 2017) “We're not really interested in a transition deal, but we'll consider one to be kind to the EU.” (David Davis, 15 November 2016) “I believe that we can get a free trade and customs agreement concluded before March 2019.” (David Davis, 18 January 2017) “Indeed, [a trade deal] would take significantly less than two years. We hold all the cards. We will offer them a deal in response to their pleas for help.” (Patrick Minford, 14 June 2016) “I am not worried about transitional arrangements. I am prepared to take the economic hit to secure the economic benefits of not being inside the Single Market and being outside the Customs Union. I simply want... a quickie divorce.” (Michael Gove, 17 November 2016) “We are going to get a deal which is of huge value and possibly of greater value.” (Boris Johnson, 16 November 2016) “Within two years, before the negotiation with the EU is likely to be complete, we can negotiate a free trade area massively larger than the EU. The new trade agreements will come into force at the point of exit, but they will be fully negotiated.” (David Davis, 14 July 2016) “Trade relations with the EU could be sorted out in an afternoon over a cup of coffee.” (Gerard Batten, 17 February 2017) “Within minutes of a vote for Brexit, CEOs would be knocking down Chancellor Merkel’s door demanding access to the British market.” (David Davis, 4 February 2016) “The cost of getting out would be virtually nil and the cost of staying in would be very high.” (Boris Johnson, 6 March 2016) “I think we could very easily get a better trade deal than we have at the moment.” (Douglas Carswell, 8 June 2016) “All David Davis needs to say to is: listen guys free trade or WTO?” (Tim Martin, 2 January 2017) "It will be easy to negotiate a trade deal. It's in the EU's interests." (Paul Nutall, 17 January 2017) "Nobody ever pretended this would be simple or easy." (David Davis, 5 September 2017) “If we need to leave with no deal and negotiate a free trade agreement during the transition period, so be it.” (David Davis, last week) And then there are some fantastic nuggets from the Twitter comments: "Absolutely nobody is talking about threating our place in the Single Market." (Dan Hannan, Vote Leave) "To me, Brexit is easy." (Nigel Farage, July 2017) "Only a madman would leave the Market." (Owen Paterson, Vote Leave) “Not a single job will be lost because of Brexit, not one.” (Lord Digby Jones) "Brexit will be titanic success." (Boris Johnson) "I've been to Dublin, does that count?" (Dominic Raab, when being asked if he has been to the Irish border.) "In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way." (Nigel Farage, 16 May 2016) "The first calling point of the UK's negotiator immediately after Brexit will not be Brexit, it will be Berlin, to strike a deal." (David Davis, 26 May 2016) "A bespoke free trade deal that includes zero tariffs on services is in out mutual interest”. (David Davis, 7 March 2018)
Image
+1'd post by Friends+MeHi Everyone, We've just released Google+ Exporter, an application that helps you to export your Google+ feeds (profile, pages, collections, communities, including all comments) to Wordpress eXtended RSS file. Another available option is to export all posts published to profile, pages, collections, and communities to JSON file, including all comments! Transform exported JSON data can into imports for other services, or you can use JSON export as a full generic backup of your posts. The free version of the application enables you to export up to 3000 posts. You can buy a license key to get unlimited experience. I would love to know your opinion, suggestions or requests. Thank you! You can find more detailed info in the blog post https://blog.friendsplus.me/export-google-plus-feeds-45926c925891 UPDATE: release 1.0.5: Downloadable from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jkaut9054xzwd1e/AAAkXT7j7I8qi7ryMJqBx0oxa?dl=0&lst= What's new: * fixed posts comments download. We recommend re-downloading all feeds to fetch missing comments. * fixed message compilation for WP export * WP export now with comments * export collections and communities separately * configurable exports, pick whether you want to export private posts and comments #GooglePlusRefugees #GooglePlus #Google+ #DataLiberation #DataExport
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaEl día de los Muertos That's your American holiday, no? https://gcemetery.co
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in PLExodusThe offer stands
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThese meetings with Rees-Mogg are getting more dramatic by the day.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeIn the US, an adult on average spends two hours and 51 minutes on their smartphone every day. That is eight minutes longer than Andrei Tarkovsky’s film Stalker.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in PLExodus: The Beginning is NearGoogle Plus Archiver: gplus-archiver This is a PHP-based tool which queries the G+ API and can archive entire communities as JSON files, created by +Spencer Salyer. There is a 10,000 query/day limit imposed by Google on Google+ activity and you can cut through that quickly. I've not tested this, looking for folks who can/will. There's a set of archived communities as an example at: https://wispsoftime.com/gplus-archiver/ His notes follow: It is PHP code to query the G+ API with the community ID and loop through all the posts and comments, storing them as json files (one per post). It can eat through their 10k query/day limit quickly depending on the community, so I disabled the form on the live site. I'd be happy to take requests for archival, though. It should be every post and associated comments in each community, with info for photos and attachments, etc. I'm not actually downloading attachments, so much of that is still hosted at Google. It's still a bit of a work in progress, but I thought it better to download what I could as soon as I could. The code is here, if it's helpful: https://github.com/sdsalyer/gplus-archiver
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Google+ Mass Migration
Image
+1'd post by John Lewis in Google+ HelpHello Google+ Help Community. My name is John Lewis and shortly after the bullet point announcing the closure of Google+ was released I started a community to help users manage migration to other Social Media sources. I named it Google Mass Migration and it's here: https://plus.google.com/communities/112164273001338979772 I was immediately contacted by the media. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/10/google-plus-users-mourn-shutdown.html Originally my plan was to only include thought leaders and have a small community, but that plan did not account for the amount of grief that users were experiencing. It quickly became obvious that users needed a lot of hand-holding to navigate the five stages of loss [denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance]. We have over 3000 users and we continue to grow. I suspect just this post will bring hundreds more. We have created forms and directories for users to locate each other after the closure, created tutorials for using Google Takeout services, researched bugs in that same service, and provided comparisons of other online social media options. This just scratches the surface of what these amazing community users have done to self-help each other. I am not aware of any +Google+ members who joined the community. If they are there, they are silent. I had hoped this meant there was a plan being worked on to help current users, but as time continues to move on, I have less hope. People have already migrated off Google+. I've come here to present a simple alternative. If you want a stronger connection to your users and you want to help them make their way to safe harbors on the internet, please consider participating. Failing that, perhaps a section here on how to use Google Takeout to help save what has been created on this remarkable social network. The enemy here is confusion, misinformation, and delay. I'm offering a hand to you to help demystify this process for your users. If you do not wish to reply in a comment, you can contact me directly by email. Kindest Regards, John Lewis
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Google+ Mass MigrationAny Google+ Help mods or members in G+MM We're trying to reach out to both the Google+ Help community and moderators with limited success to date. If you'd be willing to make the case for G+ Help working with rather than against Google+ Mass Migration, we'd appreciate it. Thanks.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitSince the Brexit referendum, West Hertfordshire Hospital Trust has lost 321 members of staff. All of them happen to be EU non-UK nationals. A couple of takes on the matter: 1) Surely a coincidence, right? 2) This will increase wages for healthcare workers. [Hahahahaaaaa] 3) Just hire Dave from the pub as a replacement. He is a graduate from the school of hard knocks, so he knows his way around. 4) On a more serious note, the whole Brexit crisis exposes one of the other weaknesses of the UK social model. It is one thing to hire the best and the brightest from abroad for specialist roles, and an entirely other thing to be dependant on other states to provide you with nurses, teachers, plumbers, scientists, doctors and other specialists.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitJo Johnson has resigned as a transport minister, saying the country is "barrelling towards an incoherent Brexit" and calling for another referendum. The Orpington MP said that "given that the reality of Brexit has turned out to be so far from what was once promised, the democratic thing to do is to give the public the final say". Mr Johnson added his brother Boris, the chief Brexit campaigner and former foreign secretary, is "as unhappy with the government's proposals as I am". Can't complain about this Brexit TV series. Each time you think it gets a bit boring the writers throw in something from the left field.
Image
+1'd post by wcangel in Google+ AspireGoogle Plus Migration: The Journey Does Not End Here Notes from different people. Major resources and go to G+ communities. Gandalf - The journey does not end here... (HD) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rag_9J1ZC2g "The journey does not end here." Death is just another path, one that we all must take." I am, as you all know, the main free society organizer on this social platform and also the main Buddhist teacher. My work here will continue for another seven months. It is not possible to do this kind of outreach on any other social platform due to several reasons. It is very possible that many people will choose to migrate their online social networking from Google plus to a set of platforms rather than just one platform. I expect to move most of my social content and public service work to places like MeWe, reddit, and Pinterest. This new set of tools is a far weaker set of capabilities and resources than the Google Plus platform presently offers, particularly for what I do. Obviously, no real work can be done on either Fascistbook or Twitter. Fascistbook is spyware and pure evil. The loss of G+ is catastrophic for global communication. If Google were to defer their platform shutdown for another six months that would be of enormous benefit to many, but there is no reason to expect that to happen. To do global communication several fundamental characteristics are necessary. One of these is multiple language support. In particular, Japanese, Chinese, Russian, Hindi and western languages must be supported for any social platform to be a global platform. MeWe may be a good platform for English language users, but it does not presently support Chinese or Hindi. G+ supports Thai and Sinhalese and Chinese, which makes possible engagement with Asian and Asian Buddhist communities. I can hope that someone at MeWe is smart enough to do the right thing and set up good language support ( Chinese and Hindi ) in the next six months but I have no reason to expect this obvious and crucial step will be taken by then. A second critical necessity is free speech. MeWe maintains that as a primary principle but Fascistbook is a primary enemy of free speech, as are some other platforms and platform services. One medium size group ( N ~60K) is foolishly moving to Fascistbook so I told them why this is disastrous and why no intelligent or sane person would go there with them. In a few months I kiss them goodbye and that is their loss. An alternative approach for major content providers is to generate a stream that propagates to different distributaries, such as a dedicated blog, Fascistbook and others at the same time. This works but it does not support community engagement, just content distribution. Here are some resources and technical perspectives. Good fortune to us all, muggles and wizzies alike. The Traveling Wilburys - End Of The Line https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMVjToYOjbM ======================= Established G+ Exodus Communities https://social.antefriguserat.de/index.php/Established_G%2B_Exodus_Communities#Reddit On platforms supporting hashtags, broadcasting or following the following should turn up other Google+ refugees: #googleplus #gplusrefugees #gplusrefugee #gplusexodus The Pluspora pod is operated and principally populated by Google+ refugees. As of 13 October 2018, http://pluspora.com - increased membership from perhaps 100 before the G+ termination announcement (October 8) to 5500 within a few days. Reddit There are several Google+ and specifically Google+ Refugee subreddits. /r/GooglePlus is a general-interest Google Plus forum not specifically oriented at refugees. Moderators have not responded to inquiries from Dredmorbius (/u/dredmorbius at Reddit). 6,681 subscribers as of 19 October 2018. /r/GooglePlusRefugees is a general-discussion forum. 174 subscribers as of 19 October 2018. https://social.antefriguserat.de/index.php/Main_Page This wiki serves the population of present and former Google+ users seeking to continue their community across future platform(s). The goal of this Wiki is to gather and consolidate information: Facilitating individual and group migrations. In one place. That can be collaboratively edited. Out-of-band of G+ itself, or any one other destination platform About alternatives, risks, concerns, opportunities, hopes, fears. ============================== https://mewe.com/join/google_plus_refuge Google+ Mass Migration https://plus.google.com/communities/112164273001338979772 The Beginning is Near https://plus.google.com/communities/107813327011154265528 ============================== What is the difference between friendica and hubzilla? https://github.com/friendica/friendica/issues/2894 Friendica is at heart and primarily implements a "federated decentralised social network". It is a social network which aggregates other social networks as well as providing its own protocol and social service. what is the difference between friendica and hubzilla? The more easy question would be, what do they have in common ;-) For me, Hubzilla is decentral publishing of all kinds of things with a fine rights management. And Friendica is decentral social networking with a fine management of who you socialize with and connections to many other social networks. Publishing of things includes some social networking though, as does social networking include some publishing. And I know that the scope of this comparison is far to limited to grasp the complexity of the question asked. ============================== Let's say that you decided to split your G+ activity into separate activities living in different digital environments. Perhaps you'll blog at site X and chat through app Y and keep up with current events and trends on platform Z. What would your categories be and which solutions would you currently favor for each? (I'm shamelessly hoping to steal your answers.) Edward Morbius Owner +8 This roughly describes my planned strategy. 1. Write, blog, research, organise, and Wiki: GitLab. My source content is in my control, under Git, on my own desktop, in backups, and at any other hosts I syndicate that to. 2. Direct syndication through RSS/Atom. 3. Propogation through microblogging platform(s). Mastodon certainly. I may even set up a Twitter account. I'm considering the username "Registered under protest" preliminarily.... (There's already a "dredmorbius", it's not me.) 4. Further propogation through social / lightweight blogging networks. Diaspora, Fediverse, Hubzilla, Friendica, etc. Most of 3 & 4 would be automated. 5. Interaction and engagement on a personal basis (largely replacing G+) through one of the federated social networks. If I can have a central management hub for those (and I've run across a platform that seems to offer that on a web-based basis, though I'd prefer a local desktop or commandline option), so much the better. The faster I can slice through mentions, comments, etc. the better. One thing I've ... somewhat ... liked about G+ is that on desktop it's modestly possible to address interactions directly through the Notifications pane. Considering Notifications as its own stream and giving a way to rapidly: a) See events. b) Filter by type. c) Respond immedately from the Notifications context (screen, pane, pop-up, whatevs, though I prefer a page rather than overlay). d) Expand context in the Notifications context as needed for more complex stuff. e) Dismiss immediately events of no interest. (With an undo for fumbling finger factor.) f) Where any administrative factors are presented, say, group management or moderator actions -- approving, banning, admonishing, etc., users or content -- those controls are also presented directly in the Notifications context. (The lack of this is a major frustration on Reddit. It's pathologically bad for G+ Communities, do not even get me started.) I think that's a big chunk of it. A lightweight Notifs management as a secondary option could also be useful. A gripe with Diaspora is that dealing with Notifs is slow. It's only a few seconds' lag, but that's seconds that don't have to be there. A <300ms target would be ideal. I'm getting ~3s, which is 10x worse, and which repeated 33 times (present notifs count) is three minutes spent just waiting for things to happen while I'm responding to Notifications. And in cases that bumps up 2-3x slower, or worse. Nine minutes of wait. And 33 notifs is light traffic, at least right now. The models I'm thinking of are G+, Diaspora, Ello (which has had several variations of Notifications, and created then reverted the best I've ever seen, sort of a side-pane, Usenet reader (think Netscape's Usenet client, or rtin), Reddit, and Hacker News (great on everything except context, though limited to replies only). Mutt (console email client) is among the best interfaces I've ever seen, and some sort of local social-to-email gateway might address a few concerns / considerations. Speaking of email and Usenet: among many factors which killed them (and there were many -- I've got a "what killed Usenet" post at the Dreddit https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius) was the fact that there was no standardisation of composing conventions. You had a few schools of this, but they interacted poorly: 1. Top vs. bottom posting. Largely a Unix / Windows split. 2. Indication of emphasis, with the underscore/star style in plain text (similar to AsciiDoc). Markdown actually breaks a few of these conventions but is ubiquitous enough to be useful. 3. HTML vs. raw text. 4. Line length. Still matters for some. 5. Attachments. 6. Other rich-text formats. Among the fundamental failures was a failure to come to a common agreement on interactions. I had a revelation when reading about Docker, a lightweight virtualisation system. The technology consists solely of an agreement on how to do things. All the pieces were already there. Protocols and standardisation, like trust, are social glue. They can also create problems. Protocols that become change-resistant stagnate development. There are examples of this and the communications and information fields are rife with these because standards and conventions of exchange are the essence of communications. Lewis Carroll and the White Rabbit's "Glory" are the antithesis of communication -- if you use symbols known only to yourself, you can communicate with no one. (Groups, though, using conventions known only internally, create the capacity to operate independently of an outside environment. This is a tool, for good or bad. See RibbonFarm's essay on "legibility vs. illegibility.) SMTP, NNTP, IRC, SMS, HTML, nroff/groff, DocBook, Markdown, LaTeX (an extension of TeX), proprietary office formats (consider in context of above parenthetical note), RSS, Atom, XHTML, HTML5, the Federation / Fediverse protocols, Mastodon, diff formats, revision control formats, git, SSH, PGP, MIME, TCP/IP, Slack. They're all (at least in part) protocols, some open, some closed, some dynamic and developing, some static, some interacting, some not, some encapsulating, some encapsulated. (Programming languages and various other bits overlap with this in various ways.) Ok, that's enough for this morning's ramble.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in PLExodus
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Google+ Mass Migration
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitWhat have Sarah Wollaston (Tory), Paul Williams (Tory), and Philippa Whitford (SNP) in common? They are all doctors, they all sit in parliament, and together they are trying to forge a cross-party group that will try to pass an amendment to Theresa May's vote on her Brexit deal. This amendment 'will state that acceptance of the prime minister’s deal must be dependent on a public vote taking place beforehand, in which people would be offered the choice of leaving on the terms of that deal, or staying in the EU.' Apparently, they are trying to build bridges based on the common concern for the NHS. Smart doctors, you might say. They reckon they have the backing of about 100 MPs. All eyes on Corbyn now. Will he allow his MPs to vote for this amendment? He himself is presently in favour of a different strategy: let May's deal fall through and force a general election first. Which is not what the majority of party members wants, apparently.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThis does not bode well. Khan [the counter-extremism commissioner], appointed by Theresa May in the wake of the Manchester Arena attack, told the Observer: “I was really shocked that in every place I visited I heard deep concerns about the activity and impact of the far right. “Councils across the country raised the impact the far-right demonstrations have on whole towns, exploiting tensions and stoking division. I repeatedly heard about a climate of intolerance and polarisation.” One youth worker from the south of England told Khan of his fears that a “whole generation of vulnerable children” could be lost to the far right. Elsewhere, a local education group said it had seen increasing numbers of children making racist and extremist statements in schools. [...] “This backs up what experts have been telling me – that we are seeing a new wave of the far right: modernised, professionalised and growing; supported by a frightening amount of legal online extremist material.” Rowley [counter-terrorism officer of the Met, ret.] warned the public and politicians not to underestimate the situation, describing how National Action, a proscribed neo-Nazi organisation, has “a strategy for a terrorist group” with online information on how to create discord in communities and evade police surveillance.
Image
+1'd post by Jack Samuel in Google+ HelpI've been using Google blogger for a few weeks now and I find it to be an acceptable alternative to Google+ collections. Actually in terms of page view/traffic information I find it to be more useful than collections. And people can subscribe to my blog posts with feed readers or by email. But I'm wondering how safe the Google Blogger platform is from Google deciding to pull the plug on that too? Any thoughts about this? I considered using Word Press for my blog but I like the simplicity of Google Blogger.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitAlso seen yesterday, in London.
Image
+1'd post by Macdaddy Josh in Google+ Mass MigrationI use facebook all the time
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in PLExodus#PlexodusWiki : Front page, all blue Google+ Exodus Wiki milestone achieved, all the initially-planned front-page articles are filled out, no more red links (nonexistent pages) at the front. Still lots of work to do but this feels good. 30 pages total. Catching up on Wikipedia, right? https://social.antefriguserat.de/index.php/Special:AllPages (Please do not tell me how many pages the Big W added in the past 24 hours, thank you kindly.) https://social.antefriguserat.de/index.php/Main_Page
Image
+1'd post by Brian Holt Hawthorne in Google+ Mass MigrationBack before twitter introduced the concept of micro-blogging, we had actual blogs (web-logs). One of the most powerful parts of blogs was near-universal syndication using a few standards such as RSS. Then, along came walled gardens like Twitter and Google+, and suddenly you needed a separate app or web site for each. Google+ was compelling enough for me that I basically stopped reading blogs, except those linked to from Google+. Now that Google+ is going away, I am rethinking that decision. I’ve installed Feedly and I’m slowly adding all the blogs of people whom I used to just follow on Google+. Some of these are standalone Wordpress blogs. Some are journals on Dreamwidth. I’m sure I will find others. But however many people are moving to MeWe or pluspora or whatever, if it doesn’t support RSS syndication, I probably won’t be interacting with them much. I’ve downloaded apps for all those that have it, but I can’t see myself making the mistake of investing in any one self-enclosed site again. I am tired of walled gardens. I am tired of “social media” meaning a proprietary website. I am tired of seeing distributed problems solved and then those solutions destroyed by Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon. Before walled-gardens nearly killed blog syndication, we saw global standards like XMPP/Jabber that allowed universal chat through many services (AIM, iChat, Google Chat) with a single app destroyed by new proprietary systems and refusal to continue to use standards. So, MeWe is great, but without RSS support (which it will never have because of its privacy model), I won’t use it often. Pluspora (and diaspora) will consume RSS feeds, but unless I am missing something, it won’t generate RSS feeds. [ Update: +Edward Morbius points out you can follow a diaspora feed in Feedly https://plus.google.com/104092656004159577193/posts/47cw3hzPmTv ] So, I am going back to reading blogs. I’ll probably resurrect one of my old blogs, or start a new one, and wash my hands of the whole walled-garden social media concept.
Image
+1'd post by Martha Magenta in Google+ Mass MigrationWhen you announce alternatives to G+ it would be helpful if you said whether we can create communities there Many of us are looking for sites where we can migrate our communities, not just individuals doing our own thing and posting stuff on a stream. Thank you.
Image
+1'd post by Julie Wills in Google+ UpdatesSo long, and thanks for all the fish 😢
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitNero, is that you?
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitSomeone is trolling Nigel on Facebook. Its the will of the people
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitAnother week going around in circles. And why are going in circles? The reason for that loop is quite simply stated: there is no way of undertaking Brexit – and certainly not hard Brexit, in its original meaning – which does not do a level of damage to the economy and also to the politics of Northern Ireland that no democratic government could get away with. Hence when the government try to find a relatively less economically damaging form of Brexit, proponents of hard Brexit revolt; when hard Brexiters push towards an FTA or even no deal, the economic damage implied causes pragmatic politicians and voters to recoil. It is that basic, irreconcilable contradiction which structures current the British politics of Brexit.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitOn British exceptionalism. I am so done with it. On the face of it, Brexit looks like a protest vote by the left behind. But the underlying reason is the hubris and ignorance of much of the British elite, not just the eurosceptics among it. They are less worldly than they imagine themselves to be. Their exaggeration of British political and economic power has fed the idea that Britain can afford to leave the EU, indeed flourish outside of it. And they have tacitly encouraged the poor and insecure to blame their problems on EU membership, in order to shift attention from domestic policy failures. This message has been reinforced by a stridently eurosceptic, and sometimes xenophobic, print media. The country’s responsible papers have been loath to call out the xenophobic ones, either out of exaggerated respect for Britain or growing indifference to the country. Britain’s sense of economic invulnerability is even more puzzling. Why does a country that is significantly poorer than Germany, with far fewer internationally competitive industries and greater dependence on foreign capital and managerial expertise, believe it can afford to quit the single market? After all, the Germans would see such a move as gratuitous economic self-harm. Britain’s economic performance is no better than France’s and on some important measures – not least productivity – far worse. Yet nobody from France’s political mainstream seriously entertains the idea that French business or the French economy would benefit from leaving the EU. Much of the British elite know little about how Britain’s economic strengths and vulnerabilities compare with other European countries. They are quick to state that Britain is the sixth biggest economy in the world (just behind France), which it is on some measures. But few realise that three-quarters of the country is poorer than the EU-15 average, or that its growth performance (at least per head) has been mediocre at best. And few know that there are relatively few British-owned and managed businesses with a strong record of growth. There are, of course, bright spots in the British economy, but a disproportionately high share of those bright spots reflect the involvement of foreign capital and expertise. Indeed, foreign-owned businesses generate over half of the country’s exports.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceI saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by the blockchain hype train, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through silicon valley at dawn looking for an affordable lease, angel investor capital burning for the ancient heavenly connection to distributed consensus in the GPUs of night https://octodon.social/@cwebber/100622752351781361
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / Surveillance"mastodon.social does NOT have a rule for putting CWs on journalistic or political content" Gargron, Mastodon's founder, weighs in on the use of text-hiding content warnings (CW) on Mastodon, in a conversation with an FT journalist. As has a Space Alien Cat. https://mastodon.cloud/@dredmorbius/100589004772372257 Backstory: There's been a strong push by a vocal minority to impose this as a standard. I disagree, strongly. https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/100602250054630100
Image
+1'd post by Jenny WinderAnti-vaxxers are still spreading false claims as people die of measles #FFSPeopleVaccinate !
Image
+1'd post by Jenny WinderThis isn’t just a culture war – we need a radical anti-fascist movement right now Support from musicians is all very well, but the far right must be fought on the ground in communities too
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitRaab gets skewered in the Guardian. By the time the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator got to the bit where he explained the Chequers deal was up merde creek, Raab was wearing that specific facial expression that translates as: never mind our money and borders, I urgently need to take back control of my sphincter. I assume his headset interpreter was simply whooping: “Welcome to the EU, bitch!” So does his boss: Thus Theresa May’s grim avant garde theatre cycle continues. Waste time getting an agreement on an idea that has already been rejected by the EU. Take it to the EU. Get rinsed; repeat. On Thursday, Barnier explained that attempts to appeal to EU leaders over his head were a waste of time. On Friday, Theresa May was in Austria to attempt to appeal to EU leaders over his head. And Boris: Waiting in the wings, still, is rapidly mutating superbug Boris Johnson, who presumably hopes that a post-Brexit medicines crisis will leave Britain incapable of resistance to him.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceThis clicks with me
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitTweet from Lisa O'Carroll (Guardian correspondent): BREAKING: Raab promises government will "make sure there is adequate food" in Britain in the event of no Brexit deal. But says it is wrong to say government itself is stockpiling "Adequate". Very reassuring.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitUKIP seems to be back, at least for the moment, polling at around 8%. Doubtlessly fuelled by the narrative that the present UK government has "betrayed Brexit", whatever that means. But there is more. Say what you will, but under Farage UKIP ruthlessly eliminated the Nazis and other ultra-right elements from its membership, to present itself as a clean and sober one-issue party that mom and dad could vote for. And he was successful. Now the Nazis are back, and lines are getting blurred. We will see how that works out.
Image
+1'd post by OOUKFunkyOO
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThis looks like progress to me.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeThats some British entrepeneurship right here.
Image
+1'd post by Armin Grewe in Europe, Brexit, Remoaning and all that nonsenseSo the hardcore ideologues win. Holding the country to ransom for their benefit. Hopefully they will at some point be made to pay.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitTheresa May has caved in again to avoid an open confrontation with her hardcore Brexiters. The Chequers plan has now been amended in order to make it more difficult for the EU to strike a conciliatory tone. By this, the hardliners hope to navigate towards a hard Brexit. I wish I would make this up. Most importantly, one amendment will make it illegal to establish a customs border in the Irish Sea. Which means that either the whole UK stays in the customs union, or we will have a hard border in Ireland. Just wait, it gets better. Tweet by Laura Kuennsberg: Even more messy - now told some Tory MPs will vote against the govt tonight because they are so cross that ministers have given into the ERG [ERG: hardcore Brexiters] https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1018870124290461696 Tweet by Robert Peston: Theresa May having capitulated to the rebel Brexiters of the ERG, the rebel Remainers are now so incensed that they are planning to vote tomorrow to force her to sign up for customs union. May is out of Brexit frying pan and into Remainer fire. Ouch https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1018883748400713728 Fuck it, I am in the Winchester, having a pint until this all blows over.
Image
+1'd post by Alan Stainer in Green TechnologyGet out there and make it happen As well as launching the #Refill scheme in the Horsham District, we managed to get the council to install a publicly accessible water tap in the park. We have now had confirmation that it is going to be permanent, which is a massive bonus for everyone visiting the park in Horsham. If you are in the UK, go here for the Refill app. https://www.refill.org.uk/get-the-refill-app/
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit"I voted for Brexit but now it turns out to be bad, and now I want to slow down and gather facts and learn about it". What fucking attitude is this?
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaI fear Google's control of the web My fear is this -- once Google has control of the web, they can turn off huge parts of it for whatever reason, however thoughtless, and without disclosing why. They might say they would never do it, but I've seen them do it with Google Reader. Their intentions might be fine and it might not be on their roadmap, but capturing RSS and then shutting it off probably wasn't on their roadmap either, until they decided to do it. Then it was on their roadmap.... -- David Winer http://scripting.com/2018/06/12/140329.html
Image
+1'd post by Aaron Parecki in MicroformatsHere's to 12 years of Microformats! http://microformats.org/2017/06/20/evolving-for-12-years
Image
+1'd post by Graham Reed in Motorcycle RoadracingAnna Carrasco wins World Supersport 300 race at Imola by 13.8 secs from pole position!!! 👏👏👏Go Girl.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceDecryption bug affecting both PGP & GPG, in S/MIME The bulletin has instructions for disabling plug-ins for Thunderbird, macOS Mail, and Outlook. No mention that I've yet seen for mutt. Update: Via Jürgen Christoffel (https://plus.google.com/115676309183554211519/posts/FQPovgSd9AN) Werner Koch (of GnnuPG) gives some more details to this hollywoodesk publicity stunt ("do panic, news at 11"): The topic of that paper is that HTML is used as a back channel to create an oracle for modified encrypted mails. It is long known that HTML mails and in particular external links like <img href="http://tla.org/TAG"/> are evil if the MUA actually honors them (which many meanwhile seem to do again; see all these newsletters). Due to broken MIME parsers a bunch of MUAs seem to concatenate decrypted HTML mime parts which makes it easy to plant such HTML snippets [...]. https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060315.html https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/attention-pgp-users-new-vulnerabilities-require-you-take-action-now
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitCrunch time is near.
Image
+1'd post by Dave WonnacottAttention +Labour Party : if you don't allow this, you won't get my vote at the next election. You need to stop being vague (and vaguely hard Brexit) and have a plan I can buy in to. No plan: no vote for you. No options to choose from: no vote for you. It's your call.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceTelevision Delivers People Richard Serra, Carlota Fay Schoolman, 1973 Persistence of Vision – Volume 1: Monitoring the Media Video: (Title screen reads "Television Delivers People. Richard Serra Carlota Fay Schoolman 1973") Video: (Text scrolls from bottom to top. The text is yellow, the background is blue.) The Product of Television. Commercial Television. Is the Audience. Television delivers people to an advertiser. There is no such thing as mass media in the United States except for television. Mass media means that a medium can deliver masses of people. Commercial television delivers 20 million people a minute. In commercial broadcasting the viewer pays for the privilege of having himself sold. It is the consumer who is consumed. You are the product of t.v. You are delivered to the advertiser who is the customer. He consumes you. The viewer is not responsible for programming---- You are the end product. You are the end product delivered en masse to the advertiser. You are the product of t.v. Everything on television is educational in the sense that it teaches something. What television teaches through commercialism is materialistic consumption. The NEW MEDIA STATE is predicated on media control. Media asserts an influence over an entire cultural spectrum without effort or qualification. We are persuaded daily by a corporate oligarchy. Corporate control advocates materialistic propaganda. Television establishments are committed to economic survival: Propaganda for Profit. Television is the prime instrument for the management of consumer demands. Commercial television defines the world in specific terms. Commercial television defines the world so as not to threaten the status quo. Television defines the world so as not to threaten you. Soft propaganda is considered entertainment. POPULAR ENTERTAINMENT IS BASICALLY PROPAGANDA FOR THE STATUS QUO. POPULAR ENTERTAINMENT IS BASICALLY PROPAGANDA FOR THE STATUS QUO. Control over broadcasting is an exercise in controlling society. Seventy-five percent of news is received by you from television. What goes on over the news is what you know. It is the basis by which you make judgements, by which you think. You are the controlled product of news programming. Television programming dominates the exposure of ideas and information. There is inherent conflict between: COMMERCE, INFORMATION, ENTERTAINMENT. There is a mass media compulsion to reinforce the status quo. To reinforce the distribution of power. The NEW MEDIA STATE is dependent on television for its existence. The NEW MEDIA STATE is dependent on propaganda for its existence. Corporations that own networks control them. CORPORATIONS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE. CORPORATIONS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE TO GOVERNMENT. CORPORATIONS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE TO THEIR EMPLOYEES. CORPORATIONS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE TO THEIR SHAREHOLDERS. Shareholders do not organize and enforce their will. Shareholders will buy stock in companies and don't even know what the companies do. Corporations mitigate information. Every dollar spent by the television industry in physical equipment needed to send a message to you is matched by forty dollars spent by you to receive it. You pay the money to allow someone else to make the choice. You are consumed. You are the product of television. Television delivers people. "TELEVISION DELIVERS PEOPLE" Richard Serra Carlota Fay Schoolman COPYRIGHT 3/30/1973 http://www2.nau.edu/~d-ctel/mediaPlayer/artPlayer/courses/ART300/pov1_ch1/transcript.htm https://youtube.com/watch?v=nbvzbj4Nhtk
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceSmile for the Cameras
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in LimitsGraphs taken from the recent "Warning to Humanity" signed by 20 thousand scientists. http://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu http://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/sites/sw/files/Warning_article_with_supp_11-13-17.pdf
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Mirth & DiversionMy inner dialogue strongly resembles this.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceI've been motherfucking forked https://codepen.io/demifiend/pen/EENKNN?editors=1100#0
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in InstitutionsIt's a dark country
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitBarnier's face make this so special.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Mirth & DiversionNext time you're out with the gang, ask at the bar for a Kamikaze and a Manhattan Mix them together and drink. It's called a nine-eleven.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThe Dutch, ever so blunt, are having enough.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege"Calvin Coolidge killed by George Bush with an M-16." Great shenanigans. Can you guess who will win?
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Academia, SchmacademiaA couple of hundreds of million years ago, we got infected with a virus. The DNA is still there, and our brain cells use it to ship messenger RNA around. Nature is weird.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeSo there is a Brexit impact assessment. Finally! Apparently, it is being presented to ministers in 1:1 meetings only. I wonder why? Asked why the prime minister was not making the analysis public, a DExEU source told BuzzFeed News: "Because it's embarrassing." Oh. The government's new analysis of the impact of Brexit says the UK would be worse off outside the European Union under every scenario modelled. So its kind of official now? The analysis assumes that the UK will agree a trade deal with the US, roll over dozens of the EU’s current trade agreements, and consider loosening regulations after Brexit. So its kind of official now under the best possible assumptions one could ever come up with? Glad we cleared that up.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitMeanwhile, the split in the Labour party shows again as well. While the Tories prefer to act out their civil war openly in the streets, Corbyn has called for an 'away day' of party grandees to review the party's Brexit position and strategy. Looks like he prefers private executions over public ones. "An Opinium poll for the Observer last weekend found that potential Labour supporters now back permanent membership of the single market and customs union by a margin of more than four to one." When voters give a 4:1 lead on a contentious issue, I would imagine reasonable politicians weighting their options very carefully. Remember the LibDems and their backing of the student fees? And then there is that: "Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat peers, as well some crossbenchers, believe that the government could be defeated on a series of amendments that will be tabled by pro-Remain peers on the customs union and single market if Labour changes position to back permanent membership." Now you only need to convince Corbyn.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitWell played, Macron. Well played.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitExcellent write up of the present state of affairs.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThe Daily Mail, one year ago today. And the guy who wrote this? He is now Downing Street Press Secretary.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceSome people had a sharp lesson in public alerting systems yesterday I've read some Really Fucking Stupid Shit from a few people who Really Ought to Fucking Know Better. Though wide-area public alerting is not my area of expertise (99.9999% of the population of Altair IV is within earshot of the dinner gong and/or Robby's warbelisers), I've some experience in monitoring, alerting, and response systems. Thus: some thoughts. If you look up the articles (good ones at The Atlantic and The New York Times): 1. The Hawaii false alarm occurred during a drill. 2. The drills are practiced regularly. 3. Somebody. Fucked. Up. Bigly. 4. The system doesn't allow for immediate recalling of alerts, or of transmitting an additional alert, readily. For whatever reasons. 35 minutes is about the minimum cycle time. It took 38 minutes to send out a follow-up message canceling the original alert, which he acknowledged was a shortcoming with the alert system that the agency would fix. (NY Times) 5. There are examples of other similar types of errors in other notification systems. The World Very Nearly Fried several times because of either spurious signals, or mistaking of training / practice data for real data, within nuclear warning systems. Both the US and Soviet Union have reported multiple instances each of this. During the Cold War there were many false alarms. William J. Perry, the defense secretary during the Clinton administration, recalled in his memoir, “My Journey at the Nuclear Brink,” a moment in 1979 when, as an under secretary of defense, he was awakened by a watch officer who reported that his computer system was showing 200 intercontinental ballistic missiles headed to the United States. “For one heart-stopping second I thought my worst nuclear nightmare had come true,” Mr. Perry wrote. (NYTimes) You might also care to look up, and give thanks to, Stanislav Petrov, without whom you very likely would not be reading these words today. A true hero of all humanity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov 6. A lesson I've learnt in dealing with technology is that, after a) things not plugged in, b) things plugged in the wrong way / to the wrong thing, and c) DNS, the most frequent cause of issues is d) alerting and failsafe equipment. Major, hours-to-days long, sitewide outages. This is a fundamental problem of complex systems. 7. The out-of-band comms channels that might have been in place to correct for mistakes such as this have been severely degraded, mostly through media consolidation and automation. Media systems have become very efficient at delivering their designated content (generally music and advertising). They are profoundly resistant to any deviation from this programme. I've seen earlier cases where, during various emergencies, people drove to the local TV or radio station to try to get news out, and found the entire building locked, and empty. Nothing but tapes or satellite / feed streams inside. 8. There's some question as to whether or not such systems make the least bit of sense. The magnesium-white flash of a bomb is a far more reliable signal, and the difference between 20 minutes and 20 seconds warning is fairly slight if you're within the danger area. (Not entirely negligible, but also not huge.) Given disruption risks of false alarms, no alarm might actually be better: Natalie Haena, 38, of Honolulu, said she was getting ready to take her daughter to ice skating lessons when the alert came. “There’s nothing to prep for a missile coming in,” she said. “We have no bomb shelters or anything like that. There’s nowhere to go.” (NYTimes) (I'm not sold on that, mind, I'm just making the suggestion.) My one exception to the reporting is that this is NOT human error, it is PROCESS ERROR. That "somebody fucked up" bit above? Given the system design, and drill frequency, a near certainty sooner or later. And therein lies a major bug: One person should not be able to transmit such a warning. At least not without some very deliberate effort. (Corollary: the EAS/WEA centre must be staffed by at least two people at all times. Probably not a bad idea, all told.) The EAS / WEA system MUST point to sources of ADDITIONAL information. Those sources MUST be up, operational, UPDATED, and REACHABLE. (There were similar issues in the NorCal fires this past October, in which warnings were NOT sent, in large part because WEA could not deliver sufficient information -- either about the hazard, or where the hazard was present, and nobody had thought through how to make the system a motherfucking bootstrap to a richer information source. See: http://www.routefifty.com/public-safety/2017/10/sonoma-county-wildfires-emergency-alert/141758/) Alerting, monitoring, address, emergency, preparation, rescue, recovery, and remediation systems must be drilled on a regular basis. They are useless if not. Emergency information must be actionable. "There's an emergency" is absolutely useless information if people do not know what to do. Worse, in an emergency, people fall back on their training or instincts, and if there is no training, you're left with instincts. Those are at best chaotic, and quite frequently bad. Which is pretty much the mess that hit Hawaii yesterday. (This is why no information may be better than unactionable information. Again, I'm not sold on this, but it's a consideration.) Media platforms -- ESPECIALLY broadcast -- MUST be brought back in the loop. Stations MUST be staffed and MUST be able to respond to emergency situations. THIS MEANS TRAINING AND DRILLING ON PROCEDURES. For all the online and Internet shit we have, broadcast is a fast, cheap, effective, and, if properly wielded, incredibly useful information delivery tool. (Competence in use is, sadly, waning rapidly.) Alerting systems should have secondary / confirmation channels. The first thing I do when I see something odd is I look for independent confirmation. This means a completely out-of-band channel if at all possible. (Among the first real signs of a true disaster, by the way, is your reporting systems are all telling you different shit, or have stopped responding altogether. This was the situation that faced the Japanese government one August morning nearly three-quarters of a century ago. It wasn't until roughly four hours after the bombing that it was even remotely clear what had happened, and Japan didn't fully realise they'd been hit by an atom bomb until the US government cabled them the information the following day: https://redd.it/1wf9yc) Public and widespread alert systems should PROBABLY generate a revocation message AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL REPORT, which is READY to be sent but is NOT transmitted unless SPECIFICALLY released. Protocol should be that the condition is considered UNCERTAIN until BOTH the initial alert AND revocation are BOTH explained. A general problem with all of this stuff is that the types of situations for which warnings are issued don't occur regularly, so we don't see wide-spread tests of these systems. New procedural developments generally come out of Major Fuck Ups. This is actually fairly standard procedure for a lot of procedures and safety systems. Next time you look at one of these, ask yourself "how many souls did this cost?" As an example, oderised natural gas supplies: 295+ souls. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_London_School_explosion I have seen false alarms go out, personally, and have been concerned that it can take days for a full explanation to be issued. One example involved a city-wide alerting system being repurposed, for a single day, as a messaging system for a specific event. The signal was supposed to go out within a specific district only. It went out city-wide. Nobody knew what the fuck was going on. This includes live, staffed, broadcast stations, one of which I was listening to at the time. It took ~30 minutes for them to declare that this was definitely not an emergency, but it wasn't until several days later that the full story came out. Again, fog of war. (Or, in this case, fog of weekend ethnic cultural festival.) Lesson: Don't fucking repurpose or overload your public alert system. It's motherfucking hands off, motherfuckers. If you need some local, one-time alerting system, buy some fucking air-horns and walkie-talkies. See: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/01/the-internet-broke-emergency-alerts/550520/ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/13/us/hawaii-missile.html Addenda: One of the best write-ups I've seen on alerting and alarm systems comes out of Google. Rob Ewashuk's "My Philosophy on Alerting" addresses many of the issues from a Site Reliability Engineer perspective. This is not entirely the same as public alerting systems, though there is some overlap. The core principles: * Pages [alerts] should be urgent, important, actionable, and real. * They should represent either ongoing or imminent problems with your service. * Err on the side of removing noisy alerts – over-monitoring is a harder problem to solve than under-monitoring. * You should almost always be able to classify the problem into one of: availability & basic functionality; latency; correctness (completeness, freshness and durability of data); and feature-specific problems. * Symptoms are a better way to capture more problems more comprehensively and robustly with less effort. * Include cause-based information in symptom-based pages or on dashboards, but avoid alerting directly on causes. * The further up your serving stack you go, the more distinct problems you catch in a single rule. But don't go so far you can't sufficiently distinguish what's going on. * If you want a quiet oncall rotation, it's imperative to have a system for dealing with things that need timely response, but are not imminently critical. See: https://docs.google.com/a/gravitant.com/document/d/199PqyG3UsyXlwieHaqbGiWVa8eMWi8zzAn0YfcApr8Q/preview?sle=true&pli=1#heading=h.fs3knmjt7fjy Discussed previously at the Dreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/2j9xri/alerting_response_google_site_reliability/
Image
+1'd post by Dave WonnacottThree more cheers for "the freest and most frictionless trade possible"!
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitLord Adonis is on a roll, giving the Guardian an interview the day after his resignation, and sharing email messages that he received from government officials while in post. Thats not burning bridges, thats nuking them. This man had enough.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThe raft of Brexit.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit31% of all Labour remain voters believe Labour is "completely against Brexit". 32% of all Labour leave voters believe Labour is "completely in favour of Brexit". That's actually quite impressive. I wonder how long they will be able to pull this off?
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThe problem of a divided Ireland solved by a simple feat of engineering. (Punch, 1913)
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceCSS Enhancements for a Website Which Shall Remain Nameless / * Search: nuke fucking Comms, People/Pages/ Collections * / [jsname="eYWzFb"] { display: none; } Note that because of WWSRN's fucked markup parser, comments are represented with spaces between obligatory parsing elements such as '*'.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitEU citizens on campus are flashing V signs to each other. I just got a hug.
Image
+1'd post by Dave WonnacottAttention citizens of the UK, your Government is laughing at you. They can tell you anything, do anything they like, tell you black is white, even lie, and then walk away from it. They are treating us all with utter contempt.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThis is what happens when you have secret ballot in parliament.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in PowerUK-EU Brexit spat now snares offshore tax havens Britain's friends / banking clientelle, many of whom seem to have favoured Brexit, might not have anticipated this. If you want to see a raw power show-down, this is it. http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2017/12/05/the-eus-message-to-tax-havens-has-one-real-target-and-thats-the-uk/
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeThe six Tribes of Europe Do the test and see where you end up with. (It should surprise nobody that the test says that I am a raging Federalist.)
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitEU will stand with Ireland on border issue, says Tusk Tusk: "Let me say very clearly: If the UK offer is unacceptable for Ireland, it will also be unacceptable for the EU. I realise that for some British politicians this may be hard to understand." And the Brexitards say that in the EU, the opinions of small countries doesn't count.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitYou all know Sinn Féin, right? A political party in Ireland. Back in the days, they were called the political arm of the IRA. And back in the days was 2015. And now Sinn Féin says there will be "civil disobedience" if a hard Brexit comes around. "Civil disobedience." One should ponder this message carefully. (Via a comment on one of my posts.)
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThere’s something about these hard Brexiters: it’s fascinating, actually. Look at the language some of them use. It’s not enough that you accept the result [of the referendum]; it’s not enough that you voted to trigger article 50. Now it’s, ‘Yeah, yeah, but do you believe?’ It’s like the counter-revolutionary forces of Chairman Mao or Joe Stalin. It’s not enough that you went against everything you ever believed in; you have to sign up in blood. It’s like Orwell’s thought police and the reign of terror combined. Anna Soubry, Tory MP, Remainer.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitSome cheerful reading for the weekend. "The problem with entering phase two of Brexit talks is that Britain has no idea what it wants out of a future trading relationship. The prime minister doesn’t know what she wants, cabinet doesn’t know what it wants, parliament doesn’t know what it wants and the public don’t know what they want. If you thought phase one was bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet." And all that eight months into the negotiations. At the heart of the matter is that Brits have been promised everything: total control and total free trade. And they have believed it, and still they do.
Image
+1'd post by Jenny WinderBrexit: EU cancels Britain’s hosting of European capital of culture UK decision to pursue hard Brexit outside EEA blamed
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeHow very patriotic.they just don't want to talk the country down.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Institutions"This Coffee Machine Kills Fascists!" --Julian Bond There's a marketing and organising slogan potential here.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitCabinet chaos is a symptom of national decline The Times is getting rather sober for the weekend. "Whether leaving the EU will make Britain bigger or smaller is the best way to understand the dispute. The Priti Patels and Boris Johnsons of the world insist that departure is enhancement. The EU was, for them, a fog which shrouded Britain’s glory. They regard power as a finite unit which was once lost but has now been reclaimed. The end of one era will usher in a new epoch of national glory and buccaneering global trade. Britain, which once was small, will be great again. This echo of President Trump’s fatuous slogan may be unintended but is audible nonetheless. This fantasy will be the worst legacy of today’s politics." "The sorry truth is that, even on the threshold of leaving Europe, Britain has no foreign policy to speak of. It is hard to think of any global dispute in which our view matters, apart from the fight we have picked with the EU." "There is a political adage that a nation on the way down either manages to decline or declines to manage." "It will not be long before this debate starts again because leaving the EU is going to shrink Britain a little. This will be a slow and gradual descent rather than a singular cataclysm, like the crash of 2008. Capital will creep away rather than fly. After a dip, the economy will grow slowly rather than vigorously. Investment levels will remain stubbornly low as returns are better elsewhere. The City of London will contract as Britain, the worst performer in an old continent during the Asian century, begins to look less attractive to mobile labour. The policies needed to reform a labour market that cannot use immigration to cover up its deficiencies are beyond the political class which is of the lowest calibre in living memory. In these circumstances, Britain’s struggle to find the money to fund its defence budget will begin to look quaint in a country that matters less." "The choice the nation has made, unbeknown to the most enthusiastic choosers, is to retreat into the second or third tier of nations. There is no shame in such a choice. This is a small nation and we could potter along happily not really bothering anyone. We could give up on all that diplomatic engagement, value-exporting and exercise of cultural power. We could opt for the quiet life that, ever since the demise of the imperial dream when a quarter of the world’s population was under our command, we have been resisting. At Potsdam, Churchill dealt on equal terms with Stalin and Truman and not a Frenchman or a German in sight. The Brexit boys and girls deep in their national hearts, think we are heading back to those glory days." So there is that. I cut a bit of fat from the article, but if you want to read the whole piece, it can be found at https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/7bvd17/cabinet_chaos_is_a_sign_of_our_national_decline/ , thanks to Redditor HeWhoTried.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Institutions
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThere is news from Brussels. Some of it is bad. Others is extremely bad. At least for the present UK government. TL;DR (is that actually possible on Twitter?): EU says 'getting really tired of your shit, yo'.
Image
+1'd post by Briar Haven in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThe Torygraph reports on the Bank of England, which is talking the country down. How unpatriotic.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit'As the bad news piles up there’s just a sense that things are shifting, but not fast enough to make a difference yet.' Brexit wrapup of the week. This is indeed how it feels. News of food rotting on the fields, nurses leaving the country, the Bank of England increasing interest rates, food prices going up, Liam Fox admitting that trade deals are hard, and David Davies admitting that the UK will honour obligations. So there is that. And then there is the unfolding scandal around sexual harrassment in Westminster, which has already cost a couple of officials their job. The government stays on, just about. For this week. But not much time is left. Early 2018 companies will finalize their relocation decisions. The next weeks are going to be interesting.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitSenior UKIP volunteers on the payroll of Breitbart? A generous offer from 'Voter Gravity', a US company that providers electoral data services, to work for free for UKIP? And Voter Gravity was funded by Ned Ryun, regular Breitbart contributor? I am sure this is all above board.
Image
+1'd post by Graham Reed in MotoGPJust seen the MotoGP race from Philip Island. What a fantastic race. No quarter asked and none given. Race long battles, multiple lead changes Clearly the best race of the season. If you haven't seen it, find it soon.👍
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit'Zombie ideas about Brexit that refuse to die' (Google headline in case of need.) Excellent analysis on the state of mind of the Brexiteers, who seem to be stuck on repeat on the same myths all over again and again. Here we go: The EU is being unreasonable (in its phased approach). Nope, they are just the stronger party. There is no love in international relationships, and the United Kingdom gets the same treatment as the Kingdom of Burundi. Don't want to negotiate with an 800 pound gorilla? Don't poke him with a stick. The UK is in a strong negotiation position (because trade deficit). Mathematical and economical illiterate. The EU's priorities are unreasonable. Nope. Citizen's rights first. The UK economy is a powerhouse. I'll be short: statistically illiterate. The UK can just default to WTO terms. This is not the 19th century anymore, mate. Do you know what a supply chain is? We just shift smoothly to WTO terms with our EU partners. Well, if they are enthusiastic about it, perhaps. Remainers are traitors and saboteurs. This is despotism. I might add some more, if I may. The EU is undemocratic. Sigh. The EU is disintegrating anyway. Sure. Any time now. At least we get our freedom back. Before you sign any of those trade deals with China and the US, you mean? The people have spoken. Exactly once. The EU is protectionist. And? Our friends from the Commonwealth are eager to sign new trade deals. I am sure they are. On their terms. These negotiations are like a game of poker / a zero-sum game. No Donald. They are really not. But in a sense this is all just new paint on a very old and rusty car. These are rationalizations. The Brexiteers have invented their identity as they have invented the past, or their past: there has been a glorious time, possibly the 1970ies, or maybe the 1950ies, or rather the 1850ies, and this distant hazy past has to be emulated. At all cost.
Image
+1'd post by Yonatan Zunger in Today I Learned:A few weeks ago, I posted an article about the Parable of the Paperclip Maximizer — what happens when an AI has clear goals and no sense of balance about achieving them. This parable has just been perfected by Frank Lantz of the NYU Game Center, who has built a game all about it. It's a browser game, free to play, can be played end-to-end in about a day, and it is unreasonably satisfying and fun. And addictive. It is, in fact, a Cow Clicker about Paperclip Maximizing. At first, I was making paperclips – first bending them by hand, then buying machines, adjusting my prices, buying wire when the market was favorable. After an hour and a half, I was mostly focused on getting better at game theory tournaments so that I could improve the AI I was using to cure cancer, solve climate change, and bring about world peace on the one hand (so as to build public trust in my paperclip company) and manipulate financial markets on the other hand (so that I would have enough money to bribe officials into trusting me with HypnoDrones). Suffice it to say that the game gets even more interesting from there. Something I really love about it is how many different games it really is: every time you get good at something, not only do new mechanics show up, but radically new mechanics show up, so that it feels like you just played a dozen games in rapid succession. And the ending (at least, the ending I got to) is smooth, perfect, and deeply satisfying. This is a true gem among seemingly simple games. One warning: It does not work well on mobile; you'll want a computer for this. http://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips (Those of you wanting to read about paperclip maximization, or why someone would write a game about this, can start here: https://hackernoon.com/the-parable-of-the-paperclip-maximizer-3ed4cccc669a)
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitI've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Tower blocks on fire off the shoulder of the White City flyover. I watched Angela Merkel glitter in the dark near the Brandenburg Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to [cough] die. (Guardian commenter BenCaute wins the internet today.)
Image
+1'd post by Woozle Hypertwin in Authoritarian RuleCatalonia is texting... via Mastodon https://mastodon.social/users/paulfree14/statuses/20420730 .
Image
+1'd post by Chris BlackmoreI believe I have managed to Fisk the foul lies of the Department for Exiting the EU reasonably well.
Image
+1'd post by Sabine Klare in Winamp & Music VisualizerI have some own threads in: Winamp & SHOUTcast Forums > Skinning and Design > Arts and Design Winamp & SHOUTcast Forums > Visualizations > MilkDrop And I still don't want to give up on my hope, that Winamp will get a comeback some day. You can read the latest pages of the thread "Winamp News". Although I myself have been slowed down with the creating of some new own random textures & desktop wallpapers because of the bad weather this year, maybe I will work again with some artist-software. My photo-albums on Google+ have to be updated, for now it is the best to take a look on deviantART and in the forums, and also the other artists, developers, plugin authors, skin authors and preset authors are very good...
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitFrom the horse's mouth: "Moody's Investors Service, ("Moody's") has today downgraded the United Kingdom's long-term issuer rating to Aa2 from Aa1 and changed the outlook to stable from negative. The UK's senior unsecured bond rating was also downgraded to Aa2 from Aa1." "The outlook for the UK's public finances has weakened significantly since the negative outlook on the Aa1 rating was assigned, with the government's fiscal consolidation plans increasingly in question and the debt burden expected to continue to rise;" "Fiscal pressures will be exacerbated by the erosion of the UK's medium-term economic strength that is likely to result from the manner of its departure from the European Union (EU), and by the increasingly apparent challenges to policy-making given the complexity of Brexit negotiations and associated domestic political dynamics." "Moody's is no longer confident that the UK government will be able to secure a replacement free trade agreement with the EU which substantially mitigates the negative economic impact of Brexit. While the government seeks a "deep and comprehensive free trade agreement" with the EU, even such a best-case scenario would not award the same access to the EU Single Market that the UK currently enjoys." (Seen a couple of times in my stream today. Apologies, forgot where.)
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate ChangeQuote: A number of media reports have asserted that our recent study in Nature Geoscience indicates that global temperatures are not rising as fast as predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and hence that action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is no longer urgent. Both assertions are false. endquote Funny, how a paper that says "if we do the right thing and work like the dickens our calculations say that we may still have enough time to keep the temp down" gets turned into something else by the hopeful, greedy, and those with vested interests in BAU.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitWhile we are at it.
Image
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingTiger Toni Takes It Down Well done to Toni Ellis & the +Team Suzuki Racing crew for winning (another) #AMA / +MotoAmerica title. Suzuki won the odd one or two title with some Aussie bloke ! Full Report via Paul Carruthers C/O MA : http://www.motoamerica.com/toni-elias-wins-takes-superbike-title-at-njmp All Race Day Details via Dean Adams at Superbike Planet : https://www.superbikeplanet.com/motoamerica-sunday-report-jersey/
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaSick of #Discovfefe ? Want to nuke it from your G+ Sidebar? /* Nuke Discovfefe */ [jsname="cUXeuc"] { display: none; } Add that to your Stylish CSS stylesheet rules for http://plus.google.com. That's a Desktop hack only. It should be possible to rewrite the entity and its URL target to "/collections/yours" using Greasemonkey. I've yet to look into that.
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Nishioka Yoshio in Climate ChangeGlobal Solar capacity set to surpass Nuclear for the first time. Badman Nishioka/HUTAN Group Solar Energy Research report : In 2017, global solar demand will exceed 80 GW for the first time. Demand growth of 6%-8% per year is expected through 2019, as recently tendered projects reach completion and new markets take off. Yet again, China will be the key driver, and we retain our 2017 assumption that Chinese demand in 2017 will account for 39% of the global market. Almost Global price become same price to decrease by the graf.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in EventsMillions affected by floods In India, Bangladesh, and Nepal. I hear the crowds are truly phenomenal there.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitMalcom Tucker has a web page, and it is exactly as you expect it to be.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit"The position paper [on the Irish border] is basically a hymn as to how things are right now." Exactly. That's how splendid the EU custom union and the Good Friday agreement works.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitLooks like the Rebel Alliance slowly takes shape: some Labour backbenchers have reached out to Tory rebels on the other side of the House and have apparently secured 15 Tory votes to back a motion to keep the UK in an EEA-style arrangement. (The necessary majority is 12 Tory votes, if all of Labour goes for it. It is also important to note that this is a backbencher-to-backbencher move; the Tory backbenchers would never accept such a proposal from someone near Corbyn.) Emperor Palpatine Rupert Murdoch will not be amused. Expect to see these backbenchers called "traitors" in the press.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitNothing better than a polite discussion about fuckers and wankers in a major UK newspaper.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitSo the chancellor is breaking ranks with the Prime Minister and now speaks explicitly of a soft Brexit. "And as we go into that negotiation, my clear view and I believe the view of the majority of people in Britain is we should prioritise protecting jobs, protecting economic growth and protecting prosperity as we enter those negotiation and taking them forward.” he says. Protecting jobs, protecting economic growths? Haven't I just heard Corbyn saying something very similar?
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit'Memo to Theresa May: your new Brexit options' (Google headline in case of paywall.) I didn't know that the FT was also doing satire. This is a fantastic piece.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegePoor Macron. All those awkward moments with the Maybot, forever documented.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeTop level banter. (Via +Johannes Riecke.)
Image
+1'd post by Joerg FliegeMan evacuated in London attack returns to restaurant to pay his bill. Not very bothered by this at all, civilisation continues.
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingJames Whitham - Hodgkins Disease ....... again After beating this form of cancer in 1995 it seems like it has come back again. The very popular ex racer (5x British champ, #WSB winner, WSS winner) now Eurosport comms man James "Jim" Whitham faces another big fight. From all us here at +MotoPod - The Motorcycle Roadracing Podcast , myself, +Jim Race +Jules C +Dave Neal , Harry & Martin we want to wish Whit a speedy recovery & ...... in a nutshell ...... #FuckCancer
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitFrom Soho Street, Birmingham. Perhaps, as CNN puts it, indeed the most multicultural street in the UK.
Image
+1'd post by David Matherhttps://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/liar-liar-ge2017/id1236890957?i=1236890965
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitPeering into the heart of darkness, the author of the piece linked tries to understand why Theresa May believes that she will get a deal with the EU. Back in 2014, she had one successful negotiation with the bloc in which some cherry-picking was allowed.Which was so because the corresponding matter was backed into the Lisbon treaty that way. So maybe she believes she can just go on repeat. Which sounds breathtakingly stupid to me, but hey, we are in Brexit country.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / Surveillancehttps://outline.com You're welcome.
Image
+1'd post by Cliff Wade in Random MusingsWhat's Happened To Google+? This seems to be a really big question right now and while we have some answers, and maybe a few more than just some, we still have a lot of them that are not answered or that just have us wondering. The Beginning Of G+ When Google+ was first introduced back in June 2011 and for a good 2, 3 maybe 4 years after that G+ really flourished and it flourished quite well. It grew each and every day, every month and each year according to stats we were seeing and reading about online. Even Googlers themselves, such as +Natalie Villalobos and others were telling us how G+ was growing, what good things were happening and other great news on a pretty regular basis. Google+ was often updated and new features were added. Bugs were squashed and interaction was superb. And interaction being "superb" is truly an understatement as this place was swarming with people who were posting all day, every day. People such as +Derek Ross(still active, just not as active), +Amanda Blain, +Trey Ratcliff(he still posts here quite a bit) used to post all the time, all day long to where you would see multiple posts in an hour at times from them and that was a good thing. Fast forward to 2015, maybe early 2016 and things started changing here big time. Bots and spam were becoming much more prevalent and spam comments on posts were becoming more frequent each and every day it seemed. Accounts with names that you could obviously tell weren't real were popping up everywhere and your follower counts either skyrocketed because of those bots/spam accounts, or they became stale and growth slowed way down or even stopped happening completely. Late 2016 For some of us like myself who have been here since day one started to get a bit of realization, though we were strongly in denial that maybe those articles on all those sites about "Google+ Is Dead" were becoming more and more true each and every day. Again fast forward a few months later into 2016 and of course take into consideration that Google Photos and Google Hangouts have both been removed from within G+ itself, and you can see G+ being used less and less by the people you used to interact with daily here. Those people have given up it seems. Maybe not completely but considerably enough that you might rarely see their posts in your stream anymore and this could be the case for days on end. Personally I feel removing Google Photos and Hangouts was what really helped kill Google+. For Photos it was both a good thing for Photos itself, but a bad thing for G+. For Hangouts, well, we'll save that for another day as Hangouts is still nothing but a huge giant mess that needs to go away. Google+ In 2017 So now here we are at G+ of today. It's had a massive redesign not long ago that is now what we are all forced to use. So many options and features are missing, communities are still quite troublesome to keep clean as a moderator or an owner and the spam is just crazy insane. I'm talking crazy insane to the point that Google doesn't seem to care about it. It's not like they can't control it because they do a damn good job each and every day in our email that most of us have been using for much longer than we've been using Google+ itself. Spam happens all day every day, more so than what +Derek Ross and +Amanda Blain used to post in a single day here, and back then that was a lot of useful information that those two alone were posting here. During this major redesign that we recently had +Luke Wroblewski used to post on a very regular basis and keep us updated to what was going on with both the web client and the Android/iOS apps. Today, +Luke Wroblewski hasn't posted much of anything in weeks and I can't recall the last time he updated us about Google+ and what was going on. With that said about Luke, I can now see why that doesn't happen as he has silently left the G+ team all together from what I've read. Again, back in the day, when Googlers changed positions or jobs and they were active here, we heard about it. They posted about it here because that was the thing to do. Googlers were VERY active here at one point in time and it was nice to see. Another one to up and disappear and one that you really hear nothing much from any longer is +Natalie Villalobos whom I mentioned earlier. Back in the day if you had a problem and you mentioned here, it was pressing the bell at a hotel desk and she was there, assisting however she could or finding the right person who could assist you. Another famous Googler to just up and disappear from here, +Bradley Horowitz. He hasn't posted anything in over 6 months yet he's supposed to be in charge of this place in some form or fashion, unless that has changed and we never heard about it either. Then there are other folks such as +Carter Gibson +Leo Deegan +Yonatan Zunger who do post here quite often and that is actually quite satisfying to see. It would just be nice if there was more Googlers posting and we as users knew more of what was going on with this place and what's in store for the future, assuming there is a future left in/for Google+. Now, let me make one thing clear. I've followed a lot of Google employees here on G+ over the beginning years, because as stated they were very active. I did it because they provided a wealth of information to all of us that was very much worth sharing for others who might have missed it. I didn't follow them just to try and be "cool" or because they were employees of the social network I enjoyed. I did it for a good reason and unfortunately that reason really doesn't exist much anymore except for the couple of folks I mentioned above. What Happens Next? So the question today is, what does Google have planned or in store for Google+ as a social media network that we as users grew to love literally overnight and at one point for a long period of time couldn't be productive at work due to having our tab open in our browser for G+. Where does Google+ go from here? Is it going to die a slow death and just become a spam haven with nothing but fake accounts to the point where it's not worth being here any longer? Will these folks like +Leo Deegan, +Yonatan Zunger +Carter Gibson or maybe others that I'm not familiar with or know much about do something to and with G+ to win us all back again and keep the blood flowing through the veins of what was in my opinion as well as millions of others, the best social media network on the entire internet? It's sad that posts like this have to be typed up and the reason for mine was because I saw a post by +Artem Russakovskii this morning, you can read that post here: https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii/posts/8mPgpdYn7uT and it really made me sit and think about my daily use of G+ and how it has changed over the past year or so. +Artem Russakovskii happens to be someone I, and many others, really look up to as most of us know him for being the owner/founder of +Android Police and just an all around great guy. He's vocal about his opinions and he can be quite blunt at times and to me, that's important and I respect it. So when I saw his post this morning it really hit home because every word he spoke is 100% true in so many ways that it's actually very sad. I hope we don't lose people like +Artem Russakovskii but I don't feel like there's anything here that's going to stop us from doing so and that's very possibly because I'm in the same boat as he is and trying to decide how often I continue to use Google+. One thing that certainly keeps me here is the fact that I work for Nova Launcher which is one of the best 3rd party launcher apps for Android, and we have 2 very large communities here that are very active. Because I handle all email support and social media related stuff, I am here for that by all means and am more than happy to be here for that as Nova has some awesome and amazing users and our communities are truly one of a kind. Beyond that, what's here on Google+ for me after nearly 6 years(June 29th, 2011) of service and dedication? What can Google do to save this place though we all have ideas and suggestions that we can answer that question with. The real question is, WILL Google do anything to save this place, this place that so many of us have called "home" for so many years, this place where we've met and become really good friends with a lot of people along the way? At this point, the ball is totally in Google's court and it's up to them if they just stand there and dribble, or do some assisting, passing and shooting to score a few points and head for the championship game. I'm really curious to see where this post goes and if it simply falls on deaf ears, or will those folks like +Yonatan Zunger +Carter Gibson and +Leo Deegan step up and offer some information or insight of any kind at all? I welcome anyone and everyone to comment on this post and to give your honest feedback and input and your thoughts on the future of Google+, the social networks of all social networks. #GooglePlus #Google #SocialMedia #SaveItFromDying #DontLetitDie
Image
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceYou are here https://archive.org/stream/80_Microcomputing_Issue_26_1982-02_1001001_US#page/n295/mode/2up #SurveillanceCapitalism
Image
+1'd post by Johannes Riecke in Cartoon & MemeMay the fourth be with you 😉 #may4th
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitThese customer reviews...
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, SchmexitMaybe these negotiations are more interesting than I thought.
Image
+1'd post by Jon E Cassell Editor Blah Blah Blah New Music Mag in New Music: Electronic, House Music, Techno, BassGrant Hommage is essential Deep House music. And having previously featured via FACTmag, Mixmag & Dummy we recommend checking Grant out [LISTEN HERE] #housemusic   #deephouse   #newmusic  
Image
+1'd post by Jon E Cassell Editor Blah Blah Blah New Music Mag in New Music: Electronic, House Music, Techno, Bass[Listen Now] if you like your House Music / Techno to have a bit more bite! Not for fans of Protools air brushed perfection: DJ Seinfeld - Season 1 EP #housemusic   #newmusic   #DJ  
Image
+1'd post by Jon E Cassell Editor Blah Blah Blah New Music Mag in New Music: Electronic, House Music, Techno, BassFollowing last years cracking Pano EP, TRP once again delivers the goods with another cracking House meets Techno record. TRP - The Future [Listen Now] #housemusic   #techno   #newmusic   #dancemusic  
Image
+1'd post by Jon E Cassell Editor Blah Blah Blah New Music Mag in New Music: Electronic, House Music, Techno, BassUnderground House can be overly pastel & Commercial House overly glossy. DJ Seinfeld - Airing of Grievances is subverting both with breathless aplomb [Listen] #housemusic   #electronicmusic   #newmusic  
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit"Britain’s Brexit secretary has admitted that the government’s 85-page permanent residency application was “not designed to deal with” the 3m EU nationals currently living in the UK." No shit, Sherlock?
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaDear Googles: I found a bug But ... well, I'm not in the business of fixing your shit any more. Have a wonderful diurnal cycle.
Image
+1'd post by Joerg Fliege in Brexit, Schmexit'Brexit by timetable: the evolution of the EU’s position Part 2' Another good and revealing read, covering the time from about July 2016 to end of 2016. Again, two impressions remain. On one side, a well-oiled machinery kicks swiftly into gear and hums along. On the other side, months are spent with jingoistic posturing, content-free waffle about a 'hand' that one should not reveal, and casual xenophobia. I look forward to the actual negotiations.
Image
+1'd post by Shava Nerad in wargamesDear Liberal/Lefty America, I know this is confusing Let's give a little 101 on why we go to war First a little on me, in case this is forwarded. I'm a philosophical anarchist who caucuses with the Dems. I was a key volunteer for Dean in Oregon. On that popular "quadrant" test, I test out left of Gandhi and Stein. But anarchism doesn't fit well on those tests, and people with deep philosophical convictions really don't "quiz." I was also the founding executive director of the Tor Project, and have spent a good slice of my life in what I sometimes describe as "applied ethics." Tor, digital divide work, rural datafication, community networking, very early net neutrality (before it was ever called that), nymwars, a lot of digital rights and public interest internet work going back to 1982. Not a typo. I am not a pacifist. I teach non-violent organizing, I am not violent. My father worked night security for the SCLC and Dr Martin Luther King Jr, and stood on the bridge at Selma. He and my grandfather were both anarchist union activists: wobbly, and syndicalist. By the time I was born my dad was a Universalist, later Unitarian-Universalist minister. So I come by my SJW badge honestly. I also believe in humanitarian military intervention. Ha Shoah. I don't favor "blood for oil" wars. I do favor wars that avoid genocides, and help people achieve self-determination over dictatorships. Why we go to war has to do with a bunch of complicated cruft. Usually it has to do, in the very long term, with power and resources, but it also has to do with some very important things with how those resources are aimed and scoped. Often the resources have to do with the "beltway" industries. These are the war industries -- people who make war machinery, like Raytheon who makes Tomahawk missiles. (Trump owns a pittance of their stock through a managed portfolio despite the blaring freakouts online -- he makes $0-201/yr on them, according to the official reports, link below) It also often has to do with economic diplomacy which can also mean enlightened self interest in keeping humanitarian peace among nations. Economic interest and humanitarian interests are often used to justify intervention as being in alignment. The translation of this is, people use economics and trade and diplomacy (that's the State Dept) as a justification for Doing The Right Thing(tm). But really, often, they want to do the right thing. And they reverse engineer the rest. You should sometimes give them this chance. War sucks. No one wants to throw "blood and treasure" into a conflict. If you are a rat bastard, you only want to enter a war that is, say, "blood for oil" that is going to protect your "1%er's" interests. So for some number of years, we railed and freaked out at some of the GOP incited wars in the Middle East because they seemed like exactly that -- conflicts that protected American petro interests. It became a reflex for the peace movement. Well, guys, it's lazy. Learn a little more geopolitical diplomacy, and a little more regional history. And stop acting -- I'm sorry -- like colonial-inheritance white folks who don't have to learn the difference between different brown folks. Because that's what you are doing. It's embarassing. People in the Middle East/North Africa are just as different as people in different countries in Europe, probably more. They have more different kinds of religions, most of which you lump into "Muslim" where you would never lump Catholics, Unitarians, Holy Roller Baptists, Friends (Quakers), Russian Orthodox, Seventh Day Adventists, Messianic Jews, Jesus People, Charismatics, and so on, as being all one church. If you put them in one chapel they would probably kill each other, and somehow, you are surprised, and condemn Muslims when they do the same. Heck, you put five kinds of Baptists at an annual convention, chances is there will be blood. (And some of you think I'm kidding...) So you say, oh, we went into Iraq for oil. We went into _ for oil. We must be going into Libya for oil (wrong). So we must be going into Syria for oil (2013, wrong). But if you don't intervene, sometimes, you are looking at greater consequences. I was in favor of humanitarian intervention in Libya, and in Syria, both of which were parts of the general Arab Spring movements in MENA. Those movements didn't turn out so well, a bunch of them -- and a bunch of them didn't turn out so well, because we had been propping up dictators for MANY MANY years many decades, but despite our rep for promoting democracy? We suck. We didn't lift a damn finger to help most of the pro-democracy movements in MENA. We only really believe in democracy when it's pro-American, pro-capitalist, pro-free-market, and we know whoever wins the election can be bought easily (preferably Christian and white and Anglophone, but that's optional so long as they can be bought, since that's the universal language), is sort of what it looked like. They were Muslim, they were anti-Israeli for the most part, the often were opposing the very dictators we were propping up (with the exception of, for example, Libya, where Gadaffi was a rat bastard, but independent of us at least). We intervened in Libya, and then Obama got cold feet and pulled us out when the folks in the EU decided they didn't want to back us up enough. This led to chaos between three factions in Libya, including the old government faction who were not supposed to be in the running -- the idea had been to have the two other factions duke it out by democratic process after settling on some kind of rules of engagement on a constitution at least enough to form a government they could run elections under, with peacekeepers monitoring and so on. But folks like you were freaking out (Peace! Food not bombs! [mmm, good vegan food]), and of course the folks who didn't want it to succeed because they don't like Muslims or they saw profits in the chaos were right in there with you looking to sabo everything. Did you bother to learn jack shit about what the situations were in ANY of the MENA countries during the Arab Spring? I bet not many of you could really say much about any of the north African movements. Name me the one true success story (I've even written about it recently) without looking it up. Right. Regardless of Trump's motivations -- and that's a whole different post -- you aren't going to get your wish doing what you are doing, knowing what you know. So what you want -- is you want isolationism. You don't want peace. You want us to stop being the world's police, and you want good programs at home, and you want this by whining and marching, not by taking over Congress. You know what? It ain't going to ever, ever, ever work that way. You are just helping out the right wing. Want to give peace a chance? You need to run people for office in 2/3 of all the states, win, and be able to jam a supermajority down the throats of the beltway. Stop marching. Or keep marching, that's fine, but stop believing that just marching will change anything. Stop even believing that electing Bernie president will change anything, because as you can see, having Trump as president doesn't control Congress, even though he's the same party in theory -- and vice versa. You have a big job ahead of you. Study up, mobilize, start learning about politics, take over -- personally I'd suggest the Dems -- one of the major political parties by insurgency -- and make your will stamped on the nation. Own your damned birthright. Take the place over. This is how it's done. Look at the Tea Party. The political parties are run by who shows up. Tad, who ran strategy for Bernie's campaign after NH? He ran Kerry's and Al Gore's campaigns too. He was Hillary's BFF. He told you to hate the Dems, because in 2003-2004, the Dean campaign took the party over and kicked the head of the DNC out of office after the Clinton faction maneuvered to get Dean out in Iowa -- and we were so well favored in the local parties and State Democratic Committees, we kicked DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe's butt out of the chair and sent Dean to DC in his place, funding the 50 State Solution and empowering the local parties for the first time in many years. What happened to your candidate? We had a really really clear lead. They couldn't fake out or do any kind of questionable count. It wasn't close. But Tad told you, don't get involved -- because I believe he didn't want to see a repeat of 2004. Well, it's not too late. Please, invade my political party, but please, learn about history and politics first, or at least go in and find some mentorship you won't try to gut in the first conversation. This is genuinely the game of thrones, with trillions at stake, and there are genuine political elites (I am one of them, retired), because it's a republic. But as Aristotle wrote in the Nichomachean Ethics, you need to study up, have a sense of wisdom and goodness to be a good politician in the ideal republic -- and that's why they only teach Plato's Republic these days, and not Aristotle, lol. Learn politics, risk changing yourself in the process. Learn that people die and suffer more sometimes when you don't go to war. That in politics, real ethics problems are not all good and evil. They are usually hard questions that keep you up at night with choices where you always hurt someone or something, and guessing the least harm may be the best you can do -- selling that decision to the electorate can lose you your job, and your opponents will try to make sure it does. If the right decision is a hard one -- like going to war to save lives? Guaranteed your political opposition will go into a feeding frenzy, particularly if you are a liberal. How many lives? http://www.iamsyria.org/death-tolls.html 270,000 adults, 55,000 kids dead in the time since Clinton called for intervention -- but heck they aren't Americans so what do you care? http://www.iamsyria.org/syrian-refugee-crisis.html About seven million refugees, and about half of those are children. But they aren't Americans, so what do you care. We need money for schools and stuff here -- that under a majority GOP Congress probably wouldn't have come anyway. But the amount of Islamophobia, anti-immigration, anti-refugee, paranoia over terrorism, and so on, generated since 2012 due to backwash from the Syrian crisis? That could have been avoided. But to you? It was just another Middle East war like Iraq. Why learn their history or someone else's politics? You can't be bothered to learn our own. No wonder the right doesn't take y'all seriously. You call them ignorant. Pot, kettle. Educate yourself, grow a few dimensions on a few issues, and I will take you seriously too. http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trumps-stock-portfolio-2015-7 (documents Trump's tiny investment in Raytheon)
Image
+1'd post by Kizzume Fowler in Google+ UpdatesOn the Notifications page of G+, please add the ability to right click and open a notification in a new tab. Not having that ability is pretty ridiculous.
Image
+1'd post by Bill Smith in Climate ChangeMany of the MPs who signed the letter issued this week criticising the BBC’s Brexit coverage as biased to the Remain campaign are part of a small but influential network of hardline Euro-climate sceptics. #Brexit #UK #ClimateChangeDenial
Image
+1'd post by Dhea Yuliani in MotoGPThe wait is nearly over... Predictions, analyses, recycled drama... it all stops when engines start! and When the flag drops, the talking stops. GUYS GUESS WHAT!!!!!!!!!!! It's Race week! FINALLY MOTOGP IS COMING BACK SOON!!! Woohooo~~ 🙌 This isn't just any week! It's the week of the GP! ^^ the first of 2017. it's gonna be a Battle 💪💪 ’17 will be a tough fight. can't wait to see what happens in 2017. I hope the new season will be just as crazy and unbelievable like last year 😅 i'm ready to watching every MotoGP race this year 🙌 i've been craving watching MotoGP race 😆 2017 is all about change. "Everything can happen". yeaah +MotoGP​ is back on track in #LCSCQatar 🇶🇦🏁 Race day is just 6 days away... 🔜🇶🇦 🚦💨💨🏁 #MondayMotivation #2017startsnow #QatarGPCountdown #LetBattleCommence #road #to #motogp2017 #MotoGPisBack #MotoGP #MotoGPBuzz #MotulSuperFan
Image
+1'd post by OOUKFunkyOO
Image
+1'd post by Michael Russo in Google+ UpdatesAnother stupid design flaw. I have my post setting set to public. where I would like it to stay unless I am in a community then I am happy to pick from the community categories. When I leave and go back to posting other stuff, it is no longer set to public but continues to ask me what group I want to pick for the community I just left. Fucking stupid.
Image
+1'd post by Michael Russo in Google+ UpdatesCommunities are green, regular postings are red.. What the fuck is this, a Christmas tree?
Image
+1'd post by Pellegrino De lucia in Motorcycles - ModifiedAprilia V60...for Kids
Image
+1'd post by DO ИOꓕ DꓵbΓICⱯꓕE in Google+ UpdatesUrgh! I think just found another "downgrade" in this new Google+. I've never used the search function in the new layout, until just now. I call it downgrade because it seems like the ability to search for only my own posts (the "Post from you"), or post from only the people I follow (the "Post from your Circles"), as well as the ability to sort search result by newest, is now all gone. Just now I tried to search "Kodi" (the software) and of course by default posts from people outside my circles also listed in the result. However I can no longer narrow it to posts from my circles only like before. Now even post from some Indian guys with "Kodi" in their names also appear in the result that I can't filter out, making it harder to see what I'm actually looking for.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaShared without comment Responses to original.
Image
+1'd post by OOUKFunkyOO
Image
+1'd post by Woozle Hypertwin in The Wrong LizardI believe this is Shava's response to attacks on the credibility of the claim that Russia hacked the election. (Figuring this out is about the extent of my intel analysis capabilities. Do I get a cookie?) Almost in passing, it addresses the "why won't they let us see the evidence" and "why should we trust intelligence agencies" arguments. I don't know what IC stands for in this context.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaOn Google and the Fake News / Emerging Fascist Threat From a public discussion elsewhere. ______________________________ So I'm a bit surprised by the numbers you're giving here, because if you're saying that there are ten stories in a day which matter, then we clearly are talking about some different sense of "matter." I'm also a bit surprised at an apparent inability to convey a point effectively. First: I'm numbers-based, where I have access to numbers. I'm limited to open sources. I'm assuming Google has much greater access to both data and potential consulting resources, and am very strongly suggesting that you pursue these avenues. This also is not my field -- I've had an interest for some time, but any deep knowledge I have on media and its history is at this stage months old, if that. Second: I haven't said that ten stories is the only scope of significance. It is a useful order-of-magnitude bound on what and where public perception lies. "Pizzagate" has been a top-of-fold story a number of times. It did emerge very quickly, and can be contrasted to other stories (Benghazi, emails, Vince Foster) with vastly longer tails. I've been posting trends data on G+ from several sources. I don't have a source that gives me top-ten headlines per day, but if you know of one (or some value 10 - 100) that would be useful to introduce. Again ("stories" == "news clusters") * Roughly ten stories is "this shit's on fire, yo", and deserves looking at. Not all of it is suspect, most isn't. Some though is. * Roughly 100 stories is "this is in current play" -- it's appearing somewhere in the news stack, and if you sample opinion you'll probably find some double-digit percentage of the population aware of it. * Roughly 1,000 stories is "this is somewhere in the editorial stack". People within the media are going to be aware of the story, though outside the directly-involved public almost certainly not. * Roughly 10,000 stories is probably about as deep as you need to have machine-level analysis going. My values are rough. Order-of-magnitude. Ten might be 5, might be 50. But it's somewhere in that range. Do the math for the rest. And I could well be wrong. You're Google. Find numbers. Call up media pros (Dan Gillmor, Poynter, Alex S. Jones (not Alex E. Jones). Pew. MacArthur. Benton.org. The problem with Pizzagate, specifically, was how fast it emerged. It was, effectively, the Ebola of fake news. I'd really like to see someone's listing of major fake news stories of the year -- sort of Project Censored, but in reverse. Some suggestion for impact metrics as well. If you're suggesting that whatever we do here should start with a deep analysis of "emerging stories" as themes which are being discussed across the Internet, with an emphasis on analyzing their (virtual) space and time localization, to identify things which are gaining momentum, then I think this is a very interesting problem, but not directly the one we're talking about. Fundamentally, yes, though you can almost certainly shortcut that search space by looking to see WHAT KNOWN BULLSHIT MERCHANTS ARE SPEWING If Infowars / Alex E. Jones is hosting it, it's very probably bad. If it's showing up consistently across a cluster of wingnut sites, and nowhere else, likewise. If you start identifying consistent upstreams through backtracing those news clusters (say: 4chan, /b/, /r/RedPill, whatevs), then add those to the watchlist. THIS IS FUNDAMENTALLY A PROBLEM OF MASS MEDIA, WHICH IS TO SAY, SCALE Bullshit that nobody's talking about ... doesn't matter. I'd also keep an eye on stories which keep getting launched and crashing -- that's someone trying to crack the memosphere / noosphere unsuccessfully (I know -- I do this myself on specific items of concern, sometimes I'm successful, and I hope my efforts are well-guided). I'd give the 2003 Iraq War as an example of an idea which had been brewing since the mid-1990s, at least (see Frank Rich's The Greatest Story Ever Sold). There are others. Persistence with such stories may lead to success. I see strong parallels to both epidemiology and spam. You've got highly similar dynamics: resevoir/breeder pools, injection points, vectors, and ultimately mass outbreaks. What we don't have, within the online media space (or, quite sadly, offline) is any effective defense or immune response. And again, this is going to be a huge problem soon in Europe. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESPOND TO INCENTIVES, AND THE INCENTIVES NOW ARE ALL WRONG Fake news pays. It pays directly, in terms of advertising. It pays indirectly, in terms of propagandistic manipulation. It's been a phenomenally good investment for V. Putin & co, as well as who knows else. GOOGLE HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY FACILITATING AND FUNDING THE RISE OF A NEW WAVE OF FASCISM I don't mean that metaphorically. I mean it literally. You've had help, but you've done a hell of a lot of this on your own. You're also pursuing multiple other avenues which could end exceedingly badly. As is much of the rest of the tech world. I see it as a mass net negative human contribution presently. Could someone help me understand what the concrete problem is that we're trying to address? This thing that you're doing? Stop doing it.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in InstitutionsFreedom is like a finger on the hand. You can't do much with one finger. You need two or three at least. Freedom is useless without equality and solidarity. It is perfectly summarized in the motto Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite of France. If you submit or allow to submit some citizens of a country (muslim for example) to constraint based on their religion, ethnic origin, genes etc., you violate equality. If you try to impose equality without putting an ideal of one nation, one people, you violate solidarity. It's a very delicate dynamic balance no nation get perfectly: USA for example, in the name of freedom, is violating equality and solidarity. France in the name of equality is violating solidarity. -- +Olivier Malinur The concept of Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite is of course familiar to me, but I'd never looked beyond the slogan to see it as a troika, a mutually reinforcing set of principles, rather than, say, some arbitrarily-selected set of attractive values. I'm planning on more reading in this area, and am looking for recommendations. -- E. Morbius
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in InstitutionsOddly enough, the Germans seem to know this story I wonder why.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaGoogle support the TPP. The TPP is evil. Google are Evil Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow has tweeted, "CETA deal has been made. Must see what it says. Will not be an easy ride even now. Horrible flawed deal and process. CETA 'deal' likely includes no ICS (ISDS) to be adopted right away which means it might never be in CETA at all! This would be huge." Again, this is a story about CETA, the Canadian - EU sibling deal to the TPP, TTIP, TiSA, and BITS plutonomic power and wealth-grab pacts pushed by corporate interests worldwide. While not TTP, what happens with CETA is likely to play into what fate befalls TPP, or more likely its successor. In the case of CETA, the big news is that the "investor-state dispute settlement" or ISDS provision appears to be scuttled or weakened. This is a crony court available only to foreign investors, in which the judges are chosen from corporate attorneys (with clear conflicts of interest), and for which there is no appeal. I've written previously of a billion-dollar claim against Indonesia, and a $4 billion claim by a Swedish nuclear power firm against Germany for Germany's decommissioning of its nuclear power plants. The pacts remain bad even without ISDS, but seeing this pulled, at the very last minute and in sheer desperation, from CETA, is a highly promising sign. Again, though, ISDS is what Google are supporting in supporting the TPP and its companion pacts. http://canadians.org/blog/ceta-moves-forward-without-controversial-investment-protection-provisions Google are Evil
Image
+1'd post by H.T.V. Blu in Motorcycles - ModifiedI'm not too sure about Suzuki's OEM exhaust.
Image
+1'd post by H.T.V. Blu in Motorcycles - Modifiedmo
Image
+1'd post by Woozle Hypertwin in Party PoliticsI think I'd better disable comments right off the bat on this one. If you think you have a genuine counterargument to make, feel free to reshare it (I'll see the reshare and will try to follow up, but tag me for more reliable service -- G+ doesn't provide links to reshares). via private share
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingCAL CAL CAL CAL CAL I'll be honest, when I watched Brno when CC35 won it brought a tear to my eyes. Hearing that beautiful nation anthem playing out load ..... it was emotional. Seeing Cal Crutchlow on his +LCR Honda MotoGP Team RCV been 3 seconds clear of everyone & then ending 1 second clear of 9x World Champ VR46, well........ that lump in my throat came back! Pole for Cal. Pole for Britain. Details - http://www.motorcyclenews.com/sport/motogp/british-motogp-2016/motogp-crutchlow-takes-pole-for-british-grand-prix/ ________________________________ #MotoGP +MotoGP #BritishGP +LCR Honda MotoGP Team +Silverstone #Rain #Bumps +MCN - Motorcyclenews.com +Arai Helmets +Alpinestars +Rizoma #Givi +Castrol
Image
+1'd post by Antti Puranen in MotoGPNot a wimp!
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Mirth & DiversionSadly, I know products which would be improved by using this. G+ comes to mind.
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate ChangeYesterday, according to the data at  ADS https://ads.nipr.ac.jp/vishop/vishop-extent.html?N the Arctic dropped another 130k km2 worth of Ice extent, a huge amount for this time of year, something you'd expect during peak melt season.  Just the beginning of this weather event.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaI really cannot say, right now, just how much I'd like the ability to search G+ posts by user For starters:  searching by me. Among the reasons I've been spamming my own stream with stuff is as a quasi-note-stashing scheme.  Except, of course, that it's fucking excruciating to track stuff down after. There's data take-out. Old-school G+ had a "search by your own posts".  That's, apparently, dead...  Um.  Yeah.  I'm actually back on (old) desktop right now, and there are no search options (other than "best" and "most recent", which never seemed to work). But yeah, a few other folks I'd like to track down as well. Google.  Search.  You'd think they'd buy a solution or something.
Image
+1'd post by James Sullivan in Climate ChangeGuess what? There are limits to growth. “Parliamentary group warns that global fossil fuels could peak in less than 10 years” @NafeezAhmed https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/parliamentary-group-warns-that-global-fossil-fuels-could-peak-in-less-than-10-years-f0400914ed96
Image
+1'd post by Robert LlewellynHinkley Point C-Oh, Deary Me | Fully Charged
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingWSB from Assen Superbike Race 1 Results & Write up What a race. Gutted for #60, happy for #69. Double Whammy ! No point me typing my none sense, read a proper report from +Jared Earle​ C/O MotoMaters dot com : https://motomatters.com/results/2016/04/16/2016_assen_world_superbike_race_results.html __________________________________ +WorldSBK​ #WSB #WSB2016 +TT Circuit Assen​ #CoS +Kawasaki Motors​ +Monster Energy​ +Aruba.it Racing - Ducati​ #TenKate +Honda Pro Racing​ +BMW​ +BMW Motoradd #Pata +Yamaha Racing​ #SMR +Milwaukee Tool​ #MV Sadly no +Erik Buell Racing​ 
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in HorsemenPopulation Growth, and Decline: Ireland The chart shown here looks ominously like the Earth's recent human population trends, rising from a low of 2 to a peak of 8 before collapsing suddenly. However it's not the Lonely Blue Marble but the Emerald Island shown -- population is in millions, not billions, spanning the 400 years from 1600 to 2000. What it shows is the result of introduction of a very high-calorie food staple, the potato, to Ireland, about 1740. With several factors, Catholocism among them, Ireland responded with an exploding population, fourfold growth in the course of a century, when the potato blight hit in 1845. Population fell by half through 1940, though the most efficatious horseman serving the Irish was Immigration, largely to the United States and Canada -- No Dogs or Irish. But 1.1 - 1.5 millions died. As is usually the case, the circumstances were complex: politics (English Occupation), economics (extensive foreign land ownership and export of corn (grain) to England), and other factors leveraged botanical and biological factors -- negative slack tends to increase. But Ireland's population fell from 1845 through 1960, over a century. It's climbed slightly since, and sits at about 5.5 millions today, but the value is still below that of 1800. (Image from William R. Catton, Jr., Overshoot.)
Image
+1'd post by Scarfolk CouncilAn EU Referendum leaflet. (This week's guest publication is from the future via Barbara, Scarfolk council's municipal soothsayer.)
Image
+1'd post by Busa Bob in Motorcycle RoadracingI wasn't expecting to see Michael Dunlop, on the Buildbase BMW Superbike at Silverstone this weekend!
Image
+1'd post by Mike Lewis in MotoGPI guess when you design a track for F1, you get processional results like F1. Only two riders -- 12th #EugeneLaverty and 13th #TitoRabat -- finished within a second of each other at #COTA : https://motomatters.com/results/2016/04/10/2016_austin_motogp_race_four_just_became.html
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaMic Drop: What we have here is a failure to socialise I've been mulling over a recent Buzzfeed profile on Google's CEO, whatshisface. I mean, it could be worse. I mean, +Sundar Pichai​​​. While not exactly negative, it's definitely nonplussed, and at every moment the piece could have gone positive, it hits a down note. Rather than comment publicly I'd largely watched discussion elsewhere, and had some quiet private conversation. The defense of Pichai seems to be that he's technical. He's a real products guy. And then: Mic Drop. I actually saw the feature, late yesterday whilst making one of my very rare uses of the Gmail email client. What I recall was: 1. A brief pop-up explanation which I immediately dismissed. Pop-ups driven by the interface and not direct user action are ALWAYS getting in the way of what it is the user is doing. They're a horrible UI/UX. 2. A new control immediately next to the "Send" button. I hovered over this looking for some indication of what the fuck it might possibly do. Nothing. Aware that it existed I consciously avoided using it. But I was annoyed. Checking in with G+ I started seeing posts on the feature. Lauren Weinstein has a post on it: http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/001161.html My initial thought was that this entire set of reports was somehow a joke, but the anger in my inbox (whether triggered by people who actually saw the "feature" or only saw the news reports) is extreme. I still do not really want to believe this was real -- but it would certainly not be an isolated example of how Google sometimes drops the ball when considering the impact of changes -- even joke changes -- on busy external users (mostly non-techie users) with real lives. I don't know that any Gmail users actually lost their jobs over this as has been claimed, but this joke should have been nipped in the bud before it ever deployed outside Google. It shouldn't even have been a close call. I agree entirely with Lauren. The prank isn't quite as bad as putting almond scent in a chemistry lab, or heavy water in a water cooler (yes, both happened -- keep in mind that cyanide has an almond smell, it's actually what makes almonds smell as they do, and that heavy water contains tritium, a biologically active radioactive isotope of hydrogen). https://www.reddit.com/r/chemistry/comments/4cpbrh/almond_smell/ But, this: Google is a tremendous part of the global technology infrastructure. It's used and relied on by a tremendous number of people, daily. Often invisibly. This is a position shared by other tech companies: Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, IBM. And many others which aren't publicly well-known, from npm, a commercial site which operates a javascript repository and recently saw a name / trademark / slighted developer dispute ripple across the Web as thousands of affected applications stopped working (http://blog.npmjs.org/post/141577284765/kik-left-pad-and-npm https://medium.com/@McDapper/npm-azer-ko%C3%A7ulu-kik-and-the-law-f22742f099f6), to Google's RECAPTCA software which fails to work without javascript, denying many Tor users legitimate access to sites.[1] Or the uncountable niche or major business tools at work on payroll, banking, airline security, electric utility, waterworks, and other systems. Say, denying checking privileges on account of a dog named "Dash" (http://www.timesofisrael.com/terrorist-dog-dash-prompts-security-alert-at-us-bank/). In exploring questions of economics, one realisation I'm coming to is that costs are not only not fully apparent to both parties in a transaction ("informational asymmetry"), but not always immediately and fully apparent. I'm not aware of a term for this, call it an informational lag, or delayed cost realisation. The conventional expression of this is "the law of unanticipated consequences" -- realising additional implications of purposeful actions after the fact[2]. And while some of these may be positive, chances are, particularly in a complex system, that many will not be. To this extent, unforseen negative consequences imposed on users are a cost externality imposed by Google. Google, and other tech companies, should make those harmed, most especially by its pranks, whole. More generally though, this speaks to a problem with Google culture of which I'm increasingly aware, and which reflects strongly on Pichai: technical competence is not enough. "Don't be evil" isn't enough. You've got to actively seek to be and do good, and to fix the mess when you're not. Google is large enough to make or break lives and companies without even realising it. In some cases -- plugging loopholes and exploits by which black-hat SEO, weaponised viral clickbait sites, or the Libertarian disinformation-industrial coplex can spew toxic nuclear waste over the public sphere (among consequences: phenomena such as Trump 2016) -- I actively encourage the results as they provide a greater public social good. They contribute to the common wealth. At other times, though, Google are actively the cause of significant harm. The "drop mic" stunt illustrates another tremendous liability. Web-based application delivery offers tremendous flexibility in deployments, but no user-exercisable restraints. Among the most dread-inducing words any current tech user can hear is "we're revising our Web app". This means: 1. A familar interface is changing. 2. There's nothing at all you can do to stop it. Jamie "jwz" Zawinski noted years ago that there is not much upside in GUI changes.[3] GUIs have little amplification power -- you cannot get 10x, or 100x, or 1,000,000x improvements in capabilities through a GUI, simply because the limiting factor is the user sitting in front of it. Programming languages and algorithms can be tied together. Mouse-clicks or stylus-taps cannot. That's a lesson I learned early in my career: I was presented with a highly-manual process for going through a large volume of data for processing. It quickly became apparent that what was supposed to be accomplished in months couldn't be completed within years with methods and hardware available. Using grossly inappropriate tools (dictated by the platforms and software used), I managed to get myself out of the way through scripting. Further optimisations reduced data throw-weights, increased hardware capabilities, record-keeping, and automated recovery from error conditions. The result was a 1-2 orders-of-magnitude increase in capabilities. You cannot achieve this with the best possible GUI design.[4] This is a message which apparently hasn't sunk in at Google: Find a GUI metaphor, find one that works reasonably well, and then do what Apple have done and stick with it for 15-20 years at a stretch. Apple, as I've pointed out repeatedly, have had two and only two desktop configurations. The original System 1 Mac interface was in place from 1984 - 1999, a total of 15 years. Its replacement, Aqua, has been in use for 17 years and shows no signs of stopping.[5] And this gets to a final point about Google, mic drop, and Pichai: Google are pretty good at addressing their own concerns as a company. They've proven remarkably blind on addressing user concerns. Consider Wave, Buzz, Reader. Glass. The many multiple stumbles of G+: RealNames / #nymwars , the YouTube/G+ #Anschluss , lack of noise controls, poor search, no curation, #WarOnWords , and the pathetically poor support within G+ for long-form blog-style posts -- what lies at the heart of high-quality, intelligent, meaninful, and useful discussion online.[6] Google's explicit focus on its own interests -- "beat Facebook", chase taillights, centralise user identities -- has actively driven users from its services. What I find lacking in Pichai, particularly in a long-form, detailed profile from a reporter who clearly had close access to him over a considerable period of time and several continents, is any awareness of Google's role in keeping its users' interests in mind. Mic drop is only the latest instance of this. "What could possibly go wrong" needs to be part of the conversation. Could someone lose their job over this? Could they be killed (see Facebook's disclosure of activists in the Arab Spring). In a given service, is it the case that data are assets or that data are liability? Are users being given control and agency over software or are they being channeled along feedlot chutes to the slaughterhouse? Why should any recommendations engine -- G+, YouTube, Google Play (apps, games, books, newstand) NOT provide users with the means to dismiss a specific suggestion, author, or publisher? Again and repeatedly I've seen Google engineers respond to feedback and criticism with personal outbursts (and yes, there are notable exceptions). It happens often enough, though, that I'm confident stating that the company has a staffing and socialisation problem. I've pointed this out on occasion. And yes, I'm aware that being data somnlier to 3 billion bright-eyed customers is a tall order. Google needs to learn how to see, and build its tools in a social context. Pichai, from where I sit, simply doesn't get it. <mic drop> ______________________________ Notes: 1. Side note. Network caching company CloudFlare recently reported that 85% of all Tor traffic was considered malevolent. Even assuming that's correct, its own systems contribute to this by making non-malevolent use of Tor all but impossible. If I cannot utilise anything other than the "standard" Tor Browser Bundle, with javascript enabled, to access a website, including, for sake of argument, the Orweb or Orfox Android browsers, or a Tor-proxied wget, curl, w3m, HEAD or GET commandline / console tools, then legitimate, non-malicious use will be actively curtailed. This is yet another instance of the self-selection bias at work. 2. The term originates with American sociologist Robert K. Merton, in a 1936 paper, "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action". American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904. doi:10.2307/2084615. ISSN 0003-1224. JSTOR 2084615. Merton notes that the concept has a considerably older tradition and is known under numerous other terms. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2084615?origin=crossref 3. https://www.jwz.org/blog/2012/04/why-i-use-safari-instead-of-firefox/ The Firefox UI is a moving target. It is under constant "improvement", which means "change" which means every few months I'm forced to upgrade it and shit has moved around and I need to re-learn how to do a task that I was happily doing before. This does not often happen with Safari. Their UI has been remarkably stable for many, many years. ... Maybe the Firefox team is right, and you can develop a better UI that way. Well, they haven't yet proved this, because Apple's UI is better. Look, in the case of all other software, I believe strongly in "release early, release often". Hell, I damned near invented it. But I think history has proven that UI is different than software. The Firefox crew believe otherwise. Good for them, and we'll see. 4. Consider this an open invitation to prove me wrong. 5. Mind: I don't particularly like either. I much prefer, and use, the WindowMaker desktop on Linux -- which happens to be derived from Steve Jobs other OS venture, NeXT. If I could re-cast Aqua as WindowMaker I might actually use the OS, though there's other bits that bother me as well. But the desktop hasn't fucking changed, and I know precisely what I'm going to hate about it. 6. See "Tracking the Conversation", using Google Search across domains to estimate intellectual and non-intellectual discussion online across multiple sites and domains, using the Foreign Policy Top 100 Global Thinkers list, the arbitrarily selected string "Kim Kardashian", and a proxy for English language content. As expected, Google+ has a small fraction of Facebook's publicly visible content (about 10%), but it actually scores worse on relevance. It is smaller sites with better noise filtering and comments promotion which have greater s/n levels, notably Reddit and especially Metafilter. There's also a tremendous amount of content on blogs, in particular Wordpress. Newly emergent platforms, particularly Medium appear to be stealing yet more thunder. I've continued to make use of Reddit though I consider platform choice constantly. https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/3hp41w/tracking_the_conversation_fp_global_100_thinkers/ 
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceOver time, all data approaches deleted, or public. Quinn Norton. At Medium Or Pastebin. It doesn't really matter, does it? A late addition (commented by me to a reshare): This is a simple truism. The ultimate fate of all data is either being deleted or destroyed, or escaping its initial distribution bounds, whether that's public or otherwise. I'd warrant that the fate for 99.9999...% of all data is deletion. We've long since passed the point where virtually all that is recorded (much of it automated systems logs or equivalent) is never seen by humans. But that which is of interest ... may be. It becomes public. The real pain here is that once recorded, the subject of the data has virtually no control over the fate of the data themselves. Who sees it, who uses it, or how. Much of the time that use is likely not beneficial to the subject.
Image
+1'd post by Bill Smith in Climate ChangeGreen Energy Futures breezes through myths about wind energy. Does it take more energy to make a wind turbine than it will produce over its lifetime? Are turbines really bird-killing machines? Is "wind turbine syndrome" a real condition?  #WindEnergy
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceData are Liability. This is speculative fiction by James Bridle. For now ...Linz tells me they’ve intercepted a data transmission from one of the blimps over Chamonix, probably headed for Marseille and the Union Corse. Deep packet inspection showed some half a million user profiles, medium-grade material salvaged from the wreck of a minor Brazilian social network and bounced around Europe by data brokers ever since. Nevertheless, damaging enough if it got into the hands of one of the ad-supported South American juntas.... Very nicely done. H/t +Jose Menes​​​ & +Joerg Fliege​​​. https://plus.google.com/105470310631807347739/posts/7F2bRdd8FK7 http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-end-of-big-data
Image
+1'd post by OOUKFunkyOO
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Economics+Tim O'Reilly​​'s editorial notes on Paul Graham's Inequality essay When a startup doesn’t have an underlying business model that will eventually produce real revenues and profits, and the only way for its founders to get rich is to sell to another company or to investors, you have to ask yourself whether that startup is really just a financial instrument, not that dissimilar to the CDOs of the 2008 financial crisis — a way of extracting value from the economy without actually creating it. I've given the article a quick-through, and it makes some exceptionally good points. I'm torn between wishing his suggestions had made it to PG before he'd published, and glad O'Reilly had a chance to make his editorial notes public. On O'Reilly's Next Economy project -- I'll repeat again my strong suggestion that he contact W. Brian Arthur at Stanford University / The Santa Fe Institute for participation, or recommendations for other participants, in future events. He's doing some radical new thinking on complexity economics and technology (and has been since at least the 1980s). O'Reilly's strong points, on a brief read: 1. Rent-seeking. Much of Silicon Valley and especially VC strikes me as extracting rather than creating wealth. Even those companies that do create monetary wealth (itself a questionable concept) in the broader economy, such as our hosts here, Google, may not compare well as against industrial concerns of the past. I'd like to see that comparison made. 2. The risk allocation of start-up returns. Particularly as measured to, variously: a) VC firms and funds, who can diversify across many ventures and strongly influence success factors of individual ventures, b) individual investors, with less control over inter-firm dynamics, c) founders, who frequently have at least slightly greater control over their own options, vesting, and dilution than d) employees, who face multiple pitfalls ranging from AMT to vesting, employment uncertainty (which puts vesting at the discretion of the company and/or VC), and lack of diversification among their financial risks (salary, bonus, and vesting all reside with the same high-risk firm). Capitalism is as much a risk-distributing system as a wealth-distributing one, and the small player ends up with the short straw. 3. The inability of venture-backed startups to address Big Problems. A VC is currently exploring the question of whether or not VC can even address the tech industry's own fundamental infrastructure, the free software on which it's based -- and with which I suspect O'Reilly has some familiarity. The propensity of startups to address trivial problems is highly familiar, see Peter Theil's infamous flying cars vs. 140 characters comment. As one of the early idealists, I'm quite disenchanted. On the Pie: there's irrefutable evidence that substantively all economic growth as measured by GDP -- national income -- in the past decade or more has gone to an exceptionally small portion of the population. Whether or not SV is hurting, it's certainly not changing that metric. It's also in exceptional danger of eating the very region and dynamics which made it possible in the first place. To my readers: comments not indicating reading source with comprehension will be removed. Sit on your hands and fucking read the piece. I've only yet done it partial justice myself, which I acknowledge and apologise for.
Image
+1'd post by Gail TverbergI added a forecast for 2016. One big issue is that we may soon be reaching oil storage limits. Another is that we seem to be reaching the end of the debt supercycle--a problem closely related to peak oil and the Limits to Growth. http://ourfiniteworld.com/2016/01/07/2016-oil-limits-and-the-end-of-the-debt-supercycle/
Image
+1'd post by Bob Payne in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Kevin KellyThere are not many areas of China left that you could call charming or picturesque. The mountainous area of southern China is one, and one of the last places in China with very traditional costume and architecture and traditions. I recently spent a week there with my daughter during the Lusheng festivals. We spent some time in the river towns and in minority villages. Each area has its own dress, most clearly indicated by women's headdresses. Enjoy!
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceMaciej, excellent as usual Interface elements you haven't seen since middle school call you unexpectedly in the middle of the night. Why Webpages are fat. Why it matters. How to fix it. Polish humour.
Image
+1'd post by Benjamin Craft-Rendon in Climate ChangeSo the North Pole may go above freezing during winter this week: "By early Wednesday, temperatures at the North Pole are expected to exceed 1 degree Celsius readings. Such temperatures are in the range of more than 40 degrees Celsius (72 degrees Fahrenheit) above average." #climatechaos
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Morffew in MobileGood advice, but will they listen? h/t +Mark Traphagen
Image
+1'd post by Pierre FarWith mobile soon to be dominant for every site, the advice will be a site should also be desktop-friendly.
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Markos Giannopoulos in Google+ UpdatesThe desktop experience has been crippled in the new Google+ UI and I fail to see the benefits...
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceGlenn Greenwald​'s refutation of the "It's Edward Snowden's Fault" meme Exploiting Emotions About Paris to Blame Snowden, Distract from Actual Culprits Who Empowered ISIS https://theintercept.com/2015/11/15/exploiting-emotions-about-paris-to-blame-snowden-distract-from-actual-culprits-who-empowered-isis/ Whistleblowers are always accused of helping America’s enemies (top Nixon aides accused Daniel Ellsberg of being a Soviet spy and causing the deaths of Americans with his leak); it’s just the tactical playbook that’s automatically used. So it’s of course unsurprising that ever since Edward Snowden’s whistleblowing enabled newspapers around the world to report on secretly implemented programs of mass surveillance, he has been accused by “officials” and their various media allies of Helping The Terrorists™.... One key premise here seems to be that prior to the Snowden reporting, The Terrorists helpfully and stupidly used telephones and unencrypted emails to plot, so Western governments were able to track their plotting and disrupt at least large-scale attacks. That would come as a massive surprise to the victims of the attacks of 2002 in Bali, 2004 in Madrid, 2005 in London, 2008 in Mumbai, and April 2013 at the Boston Marathon. How did the multiple perpetrators of those well-coordinated attacks — all of which were carried out prior to Snowden’s June 2013 revelations — hide their communications from detection?... Extensive history of Terrorists Exploiting Cryptography long "before anyone knew the name 'Edward Snowden'"... well, anyone not named Edward Snowden or immediately associated with him, at any rate. h/t Bruce Schneier who credits it as Glenn beating him (Bruce) to it. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/11/paris_attacks_b.html
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingHeroes Who Have Feet Of Clay The best MotoGP journalist in the game is +David Emmett.  You might disagree with that, but you will be wrong! David has written his summery of the #SepangGP   #MotoGP  race including that crash. This is THE read of the week for sure: https://motomatters.com/analysis/2015/10/27/2015_sepang_motogp_round_up_heroes_who_h.html __________________________________________ +MotoGP  #SepangGP   #MotoGP   #MotoMatters   #SepangCrash   #Dorna   #Marquez   #Rossi  
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingLorenzo smashes lap record then Rossi, then Lorenzo What a fantastic QP session.  Full Report via MotoMatters dor Com C/O +David Emmett  https://motomatters.com/results/2015/10/10/2015_motegi_motogp_qualifying_practice_r.html Cover Photo of mr Inch Perfect +Jorge Lorenzo himself.
Image
+1'd post by James Cridland in ChromecastRandom question. Has the new Chromecast fixed the slight judder when displaying 25fps content?
Image
+1'd post by Kevin KellyI spent two weeks exploring the Silk Road in far west China. Technically this region is called Xinjiang (New Province), also once known as East Turkestan. This area has more in common with the culture of Turkey than with Beijing. It's kebab with chopsticks. But this is really China. In fact it is the largest province of China. I took a bunch of photos and the usual caveat applies: this is a very selective view, and it does not represent the typical scene in the province at all. Like most of China it is rapidly urbanizing. But I think these images capture the spirit of this part of Asia, which once connected east and west.
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingMisano #MotoGP  Results / write up / questions & answers Right, let me just start by saying now, I am NOT going to write a race report about that race ! WOW. None stop action from #Moto3  & #Moto2  as always & the GP race just blew them away. * More Details * later. Moto3 Result : https://motomatters.com/results/2015/09/13/2015_misano_moto3_race_result_do_not_exc.html Moto2 Result : https://motomatters.com/results/2015/09/13/2015_misano_moto2_race_result_being_naug.html MotoGP Result & write up : https://motomatters.com/results/2015/09/13/2015_misano_motogp_race_result_luck_favo.html Top write up's via +Jared Earle C/O +David Emmett 's MotoMatters dot com. ( Cover photo via +Tony Goldsmith C/O +Asphalt & Rubber ) _____________________________________________ +MotoGP  #MotoGP   #SanMarinoGP   #Misano   #AB Racing +Aprilia Official  #Aspar  +Avintia  #Ducati   #Ioda   #Forward  +Athinà Lux  +MVDSRacingTeam +Estrella Galicia 00  +Monster Energy +Dribble Dots  #Tech3   +LCR Honda MotoGP Team  #Givi   +Yamaha Racing +yamahamotogp  +TELEFONICA MOVISTAR +Monster Energy Girls  +OCTO British MotoGP +Pramac Ibérica S.A.U.  +HondaProRacing +Box Repsol +Red Bull  +Team Suzuki Racing +Team SUZUKI ECSTAR  +Bridgestone +MOTUL +Dewalt Tools  Photos from Friday & Sat via +Tony Goldsmith  F : http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/motogp/friday-misano-motogp-tony-goldsmith-2015/ S : http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/motogp/saturday-misano-motogp-tony-goldsmith-2015/ Enjoy. 
Image
+1'd post by Roy Gripper in MotoGPNice one Bradley 3rd in FP2...
Image
+1'd post by Fabian RRead it and bring back the old design please! +Last.fm 
Image
+1'd post by Samurai SxLET'S FIGHT AGAINST THE MOST STUPID UNUSEFUL AND CORRUPTED CHANGE OF GREAT MUSIC SITE http://LAST.FM !!!! SCROBBLE on http://LAST.FM only this one track: "Remove the Last.fm Beta Website Design" you can get album downloaded from here: https://removelastfmbeta.bandcamp.com/ ---------------------- please be united for this we want to somehow change ship from sinking down totally ! ><  #RemoveLastFmBetaWebsiteDesign
Image
+1'd post by Tredecim NumerusLast place where I felt at home and happy about being a part of, is gone. FUCK YOU http://last.fm team! Thanks a lot.
Image
+1'd post by Andreas Schou in Science, Medicine, and StatisticsFor decades now, I have been haunted by the grainy, black-and-white x-ray of a human skull. It is alive but empty, with a cavernous fluid-filled space where the brain should be. A thin layer of brain tissue lines that cavity like an amniotic sac. The image hails from a 1980 review article in Science: Roger Lewin, the author, reports that the patient in question had “virtually no brain”. But that’s not what scared me; hydrocephalus is nothing new, and it takes more to creep out this ex-biologist than a picture of Ventricles Gone Wild. What scared me was the fact that this virtually brain-free patient had an IQ of 126. Briefly, a hypothesis.  Most of the volume of your brain consists of white matter: a fatty substance the texture of semi-firm tofu, composed of glia, myelin, and the long tails of axons further up in the brain. It can tolerate a fair amount of damage before causing serious effects: as we age, its volume shrinks considerably without affecting IQ, and although diffuse white-matter injuries can have horrifying effects, small ischemic strokes can take chunks out of it without the patient noticing. Most of what's missing in this guy is white matter.  But even if you're completely lacking white matter, there's a second route between parts of the brain: across the surface of the grey matter. In most anatomically normal people, the routes across the surface of the brain are fairly slow and unreliable, as they only directly interconnect adjacent parts of the brain. But presuming that whatever deprived him of most of his white matter didn't impair axon recruitment between lobes -- and it looks like it might not have, as one of the few interior structures that's still intact is the corpus callosum -- it's possible that his brain is simply more space-efficient than the rest of Homo sapiens. Which did not, I might remind you, undergo a design review process to prove that its brain is constructed efficiently.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Media / Tech / SurveillanceAnil Dash: The Web We Lost The tech industry and its press have treated the rise of billion-scale social networks and ubiquitous smartphone apps as an unadulterated win for regular people, a triumph of usability and empowerment. They seldom talk about what we've lost along the way in this transition, and I find that younger folks may not even know how the web used to be.... ...The web was an interesting and different place before links got monetized, but by 2007 it was clear that Google had changed the web forever, and for the worse, by corrupting links... ...In 2003, if you introduced a single-sign-in service that was run by a company, even if you documented the protocol and encouraged others to clone the service, you'd be described as introducing a tracking system worthy of the PATRIOT act. There was such distrust of consistent authentication services that even Microsoft had to give up on their attempts to create such a sign-in.... Much more. Excellent, excellent stuff. h/t @ferdiz at Ello https://ello.co/ferdiz/post/7KcF2ayh1OQHVwb_gMkhPQ (+Ferdinand Zebua) http://anildash.com/2012/12/the-web-we-lost.html
Image
+1'd post by Adreana Langston in Sensible Politics
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaWhy can I not set selected communities such that my posts show in my Profile? Some I prefer to share. Some I don't. It's all or nothing. Oh well: nothing.
Image
+1'd post by Jonathan Seyghal in Google Play Music
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic ExplorationsSo good!
Image
+1'd post by John PoteetThe future of electric transportation isn't going to be in a car for the vast majority of the world. It's going to be on bicycles that look a lot like the bikes in this article. 
Image
+1'd post by Steban Hernández in Google+ UpdatesI wish we were able to order collections by alphabet.  I know communities are organized by the last one you visited, which makes sense, but collections would have been made more accommodating if they were organized by their name's respective order in the alphabet.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in Plussology & Plexology: Google MetaWhat the actual fuck? You cannot specify both Circles and Collections on a post. Google still doesn't understand the distinction between distribution and topic.
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius in EnergyAudi's Synfuels: Yes, there's potential, but a lot of hurdles yet I've been looking into similar prospects for synfuels for about a year. There's a lot of attraction to the idea, and after abandoning the possibility of biofuels which are the other viable path to creating liquid hydrocarbons from sunlight, CO₂, and minerals catalysts, this seems to be among the few viable options. First, a short look at oil and transportation, or why this is so crucial. Humans use a lot of oil. 33 billion barrels per year, or 5.3 km³. That is, a rectangular cube of oil 1 km square at the base and reaching 5.3 km (17,400 feet) into the sky. For the US, about 6.9 billion barrels per year. (Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2014: http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html) There are a number of plant crops which can be tapped for biodiesel and/or ethanol: corn, canola, hemp, and sugarcane are the major alternatives. Plants manage to convert about 1-3% of sunlight to stored energy as cellose, carbohydrate, and lipids. Yields are on the order of 30 - 300 gallons per acre per year (280 - 2,800 liters/hectare), modulo energy density (alcohol has only 85% the energy of diesel, bio or otherwise, per unit volume). Ballparking with 100 gallons/acre is reasonably generous. The US Dept. of Ag tells us there's a bit over 400 million acres under cultivation in the U.S. If all of that produced biofuel at 100 gal/acre, the US would produce just under 1 billion barrels of fuel, less than 14% of present consumption. It would also not be producing any food. Relying only on biomass for fuels would almost certainly require vastly less fuel use per person, vastly fewer people, or both. Cost estimates for biodiesel run about $1,000/barrel, or $24/gallon. Another approach to the biofuel/biomass question looks at total global plant growth, which the eggheads call "primary production", and how much of that is already claimed, directly or indirectly, by humans. I ran across a great 2003 paper by Jeffrey S. Dukes a couple of years back which lays this out, in the context of present petroleum consumption. It's quite sobering (and was in fact what convinced me the biofuels option wasn't viable, at least not at present populations and levels of consumption): "Burning Buried Sunshine: Human Consumption Of Ancient Solar Energy" http://globalecology.stanford.edu/DGE/Dukes/Dukes_ClimChange1.pdf This conundrum has been termed "the photosynthetic ceiling" (by Jared Diamond) or HANNP, human appropriation of net primary production. The other side of this is what we use petroleum for. In a word, transport.  Oil is hugely useful stuff: not very poisonous (you can splash a bit on your skin, inhale fumes in modest quantities), not terribly flammable, especially heavier oil weights, has among the very highest energy densities of all chemical fuels by either weight or volume, is liquid at a wide range of commonly encountered temperatures, from well below freezing to hot-desert conditions, isn't corrosive to most metals or other materials (though some plastics weaken in contact). Energy densities are about 100x that of most battery technologies by weight. It beats solids (hard to pump and transport), gases (hard to store, leak and explode easily). Burns with virtually no ash. Can be utilized in powerplants from a fraction of a cc to 25,500 liters (the RTA96-C ship's engine, with 109,000 horsepower output). In a word: handy. Globally, 64% of petroleum is used in transport, with other (11%, mostly residential/commercial heating), industrial (8.25%), and non-energy (15%, chemicals) use making up the remainder. U.S. use patterns are similar to overall global trends: ⚫ Light vehicles (passenger): 59% ⚫ Medium/heavy trucks (cargo): 22% ⚫ Air travel (cargo & passenger): 8% ⚫ Water/shipping: 4% ⚫ Rail: 2% ⚫ Bus: 1% ⚫ Other: 4% Globally air uses slightly less and shipping slightly more of the total, at about 6% each. Another interesting statistic: 30% of all ocean shipping is of oil itself. Much of that use is difficult to substitute for. Several modes would be largely impossible or hugely transformed without oil, most especially passenger and cargo air, and long-distance shipping. It's possible that we could return to sail or hybrid ships, but sizes would fall, schedule variability would increase, and shipping times would rise. Solid fuels, particularly pelletized biomass (wood and other chips) are possible, and appropriately produced function in many ways like liquids. Managing coal bunkers on ships -- physically transporting coal from one bin to another for both trim and fuel management, was among shipboard tasks. Air travel without cheap and abundant hydrocarbons would be exceptionally limited. About 40-50% of the take-off weight of a commercial jet is fuel. While the per-passenger mile efficiencies are high, the distances are vast. For a cross-country plane trip in the U.S., the typical passenger burns nearly 400 lb. of fuel, about 2.7 times their weight. For biofuel at $24/gallon, that's $1,470 in fuel costs alone. Overall passenger transport could probably be reduced, but this would require tremendous changes in land use. Co-locating housing, work, shopping, education, and recreation to not require individual personal motorized transport would be a huge efficiency gain. Even non-renewable energy regimes such as a fully-nuclear economy would fail of itself to provide liquid fuels. In fact the concept of electrically-powered fuel synthesis was first proposed with nuclear power as the energy source. No liquid fuels, far, far less (or more expensive) transport. As Richard Heinberg puts it, transport is the essence of commerce. So that's where we're coming from. What of synfuels? There are a number of attractive elements: ⚫ Effectively we're using hydrogen and carbon as chemical storage batteries, same as we've been doing, but taking care of the charging ourselves. ⚫ The substrates are both abundant and reasonably readily available. Hydrogen can be sourced from water, carbon from various sources, with proposals including the atmosphere, seawater, biomass or waste-stream feedstocks, and minerals such as limestone. ⚫ Drawing from the biosphere (air or oceans) means that the net biosphere CO₂ impacts are neutral, though the balance between, say, air and seawater might shift somewhat. ⚫ While the energy costs are high (more below), the resulting fuel is highly attractive: energy dense, stable, can be stored for years (or hundreds of millions of years) with minimal loss, and utilized in highly variable dispatchable energy systems for transport, heat, and generation. ⚫ The results are direct analogs of existing liquid fuels. Medium-chain liquid hydrocarbons resembling petrol or deisel fuel, with gas or heavier chain liquids also possible. That last point bears emphasis: These aren't "alternative fuels" in the sense that they're novel. They're the same stuff we're using now. They can be burned in the same engines or furnaces, stored in the same tanks, shipped in the same pipelines, dispensed from the same stations, and mixed with conventional fuels in all of the above during any possible transition period. Instead what's changed is the origin of the energy embodied in fuel. Where for many alternatives the transition "from here to there" is a huge challenge, this is an alternative with no switching barrier in this regard. That's attractive. On processing: ⚫ Biomass and wastestream sources are intrinsically limited though they might be of some use. As noted, the photosynthetic ceiling is a thing. Total potential is likely low-single-digit percentages of present fuel consumption. ⚫ In terms of energy requirements, the US Navy has estimated that a 240 MW marine nuclear reactor (of which it has several and some familiarity) could produce roughly 100,000 gallons of aviation-grade liquid hydrocarbon fuels (effectively: kerosene), per day. ⚫ Plant size: The Navy's model assumes a plant about the size of an existing aircraft carrier hull (of which it also has several). ⚫ Civilian equivalent: This is roughly the fuel consumption of a city of 100,000-200,000 people, depending on profligacy. ⚫ Costs are within reason: Navy's estimate is $3-$6/gallon. I've penciled this out for solar PV provisioning and come up with a $12/gallon value. Higher than today's fuel prices, yes, but solar prices should be stable (or falling), and with abundant substrates, the long-term costs should be stable. This would be an adjustment, but one to a stable and predictable cost basis. ⚫ Net efficiency: This is hard to establish, but hydrogen electrolysis is about 60% efficient (that is, you lose about 40% of input energy),  ⚫ At national scale, substituting for present liquid fuels consumption would  require scaling this out about 8,400 times, to 74,000 billion liters/day of seawater, 2 TW of electrical power, and a total plant volume of 210 million m³. Think of a structure 10m tall and 4.5 km on a side. Or multiple plants totalling this size. Power requirement is the biggie: this would require at typical solar production rates and efficiencies (1 kW/m₂, 17% efficiency, 20% capacity factor, 55% spacing factor, 90% inverter efficiency, 90% transmission efficiency), 132,000 km² of solar collection, a region a tad over 360 km on a side (or 51,000 mi² and 225 mi). That's on top of solar power requirements for existing electricity generation. Total costs are on the order of $14-25 trillion. Total present US GDP is about $14 trillion, so if the infrastructure is good for 40 years, it's about 2.5% of annual GDP per year. That may be optimistic: solar PV panel life is about 20 years.... This is discussed at more length here: https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/22k71x/us_navy_electricitytofuel_synthesis_papers_and/ History and Viability The question that nags at me heavily is "well, if this is so all-fired awesome, why aren't we doing it yet?" It took me a while to become aware that this was a flag, as there's  1) Very little discussion of the process in most alternative / renewable energy literature. I've found a very few brief mentions: a paragraph in the thousand-plus pages of the IPCC's renewable energy report, and a handful of mentions elsewhere, and  2) Many recent storie and even technical reports and papers fail to document the full history. It's as if a report on evolution failed to credit Darwin. http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report It doesn't help that most recent discussion, even papers with references, don't mention the foundational work on the method (the USNRL's papers are particularly at fault for this). It would be like a molecular biologist failing to credit Darwin for evolution. I've compiled a set of studies from 1964 to present here from BNL, M.I.T., and US Navy Research Lab. Much of this was performed by Meyer Steinberg (BNL) and Michael J. Driscoll (M.I.T.). The U.S. Navy, which is hugely fuel dependent for both its ships and aircraft, has been particularly interested. In short: serious research from non-crackpot institutions. https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/28nqoz/electrical_fuel_synthesis_from_seawater_older/ The variant I'm most interested in is the angle being pursued recently by the US NRL which sources its carbon from seawater. Short version: dissolved CO₂ gas is a small fraction (~2-3%) of the total available carbon, most is in the form of dissolved carbonate and bicarbonate (97-98%, and can be released through both reduced pressure and acidification of the water. Energy costs for this are far lower than CO₂ extraction from the atmosphere. A number of technologies are being pursued to this end. Otherwise, there are two well-established procedures, both of which have operated at industrial scale for decades: hydrogen electrolysis, dating to the 19th century, and Fischer-Tropsch fuel synthesis, dating to the 1920s. The water-handling requirements are pretty immense. I'm not a hydraulic flow engineer, but I suspect this is a considerable challenge. The environmental impacts are also nontrivial: thousands of billons of liters of seawater will contain a tremendous amount of sealife, from plankton to apex predators, and even the most gentle filtration system will tend to be fouled and/or kill many of these. A key enabling technology may well be devising some way to effectively filter water from a very large area at low incremental but high overall flow rates. Seawater desalination faces a similar challenge though at a much smaller scale. For electrical energy storage -- say, as fuel for standby generation using surplus power, this is a fairly rough sell. You'd be better of with a number of other options largely due to the efficiency losses in conversion. Net generating return on storage from initial electrical generation is likely on the order of 17-22%,though the net storage capacity and dispatchability of storage are large. Considered in terms of capture of incident solar energy it's far less still. Assuming solar inputs, we're starting with 1 kW of solar energy per square meter at Earth's surface, nominally. Plants as noted above convert this at about 1-3% efficiency into cellulose and lipids, requiring water, soil, fertilizers, and pest control. While the Green Revolution has resulted in much larger crop yields -- on the order of 3-5x over existing, it's done so by greatly increasing the inputs, including energy inputs, of agriculture. In much of Europe food on the table provides 1 calorie for every 5 calories of input and processing energy. In the U.S. that value is 1 for every 10 calories. So there would seem to be a considerable room for improvement. But the problem turns out to be hard. Solar PV has a maximum theoretical efficiency of about 86%, though that relies on an cell of infinite layers and concentrated sunlight. Single-layer cells have a theoretical maximum efficiency of 33.7%. In practice, achieved efficiencies are closer to 17%. While this can be boosted, this is about 50% of the single-layer max, and greater effieciencies tend to increase costs significantly. In solar, costs rather than efficiency are a key concern. There are two battles underway for solar PV, one for higher efficiency, one for lower costs. We're seeing progress on both fronts, though most sources put the emphasis on cost. My general sense is that once you've hit a minimum efficiency threshold, they're likely right, though I wouldn't mind seeing that baseline rise a bit. Another issue is that as the cost of cells and panels themselves falls, other costs dominate, including mounting systems (platforms, foundations, hardware), electrical conversion equipment, and most especially labour. Another factor is that panels have, as noted above, a practical life of about 20 years. They degrade in a number of ways in which the power output falls to about 80% of nominal. Extending panel lifetime seems to me another possible area for research. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell#Efficiency So we start with 17% conversion efficiency. Next, spacing. If you shade a portion of a solar panel circuit, you lose power over the entire circuit. This means that you don't want your panels to be in the shade, including being shaded by other panels. This results in a maximum spacing density which varies by latitude and panel incident angle. For most of the United States, this is about a 55% maximum density factor. http://www.solarabcs.org/about/publications/reports/aoi/pdfs/ABCS-29_AOI-SR-3-4.pdf Capacity factor describes the fraction of rated "nameplate" capacity of a generating system that's achieved over time. For solar power, this is based on incident sunlight, hours of sunlight per day, and occlusion due to clouds or other weather. On average it was 27.8% for 2014 (that's higher than the 20% I've been using). http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=14611 http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_6_07_b http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_6_07_a Inverters are electrical equipment which converts the direct current (DC) flow PVs produce to the alternating current (AC) the power grid requires. We could skip this with dedicated solar plant, but that's somewhat unlikely. Inverters are about 90% efficient. There's a further 10% loss in long-distance transmission, so another 90% factor. Put that together, and we find we've cut into our available energy considerably:     1 kW/m^2 * 0.17 * 0.55 * 0.278 * 0.9 * 0.9 = 21 watts/m^2 Of this, we can create fuel equivalent to about half of this, so 10 watts/m^2 If we were to use this for generation, the effective efficiency is reduced by Carnot's law, which describes heat engines. Typical thermal efficiencies are about 35-45%. We'll be generous and use the high end. So on a rainy day, we can generate 4.725 watts of energy per meter of source feed on a 24/7 basis. And it turns out we're not doing a whole lot better than plants. Even taking the capacity factor out of the equation, that's 17 watts delivered electricity on storage per 1000 watts incident sunlight, or about 1.7% net efficiency. The advantage is that solar panels don't generally need water, weeding, fertilizer, and pest control. They can be placed on marginal land, or buildings, or over car parks, and the like. But in terms of beating mother nature at her own game, it's a tough call.  By contrast, plants provide a lot of what I call "plant services": they build themselves, provide structural integrity and foundations, have rudimentary protections against pests and disease, and provide for transport of water, air, and structural minerals. The infrastructure requirements are modest: tilled, or frequently untilled soil, and irrigation water. Replacing that with exceptionally complex industrial infrastructure on massive scale is a challenge. EROI, prices, and markets Another way to look at this is in terms of EROEI. This section starts wandering into some adjoining conceptiual neighborhoods, so a warning and apology in advance. I think it holds together moderately well.... Conventional fossil fuels deliver a huge amount of energy for not too much work. Or at least they used to. EROEI stands for energy returned on energy invested, and was coined by ecologist Charles A.S. Hall. His first application was for animals in nature, but he realized it could also be applied to human energy systems. Values for a number of sources have been computed. For "easy" coal it was as high as 200:1, for easy oil, 100:1. More recently both are closer to 40:1 as a global average, with recent oil and gas ranging from 20:1 to 10:1. Again, the first number tells you how much you receive, the second what it costs you. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/EROI_-_Ratio_of_Energy_Returned_on_Energy_Invested_-_USA.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested http://www.kcet.org/news/redefine/rewire/explainers/explainer-energy-return-on-energy-invested-eroei.html Seawater based Fischer-Tropsch fuel synthesis has an EROEI of 1:2. You get one unit of energy for every two units invested. That's a negative. What you gain is that you're trading energy now for energy later. That's the case with all storage. The effect is that liquid hydrocarbons' cost in energy terms has just increased 80x over present sources. The net cost in financial terms isn't as clear to me, and I've cited the US Navy Research Lab's values above ($3-$6/gallon) which look fairly reasonable. I've got concerns over the assumptions baked into that and my own higher estimate of $12/gallon as both assume a world in which existing fossil-fuel subsidized costs are in effect. Which gets into another area I've been thinking a lot about but haven't yet reached conclusions. It's based also in part on some of Hall's work, this on what's called the Cobb-Douglas production function, and also on the question: what's the correct price for fossil fuels? Briefly, the Cobb-Douglas function explains economic productivity as the result of capital, labour, factor productivity (better seen as technological progress), and factors for labour and capital elasticity (sensitivity to price changes). Hall has shown that virtually all "technological improvement" can actually be explained by additional energy supplied, and that as more energy is supplied, a lower labour input (and higher measured economic productivity of labour) is observed. But the actual "efficiency" gains are largely (though not entirely) due to added energy. And we're under-pricing those energy inputs. I got into this a few months back with David Friedman (son of Milton), on a post of John Baez's. My contention was this: "There's another and more insidious manner in which fossil fuel "prices" don't reflect full value or costs. "By way of an analogy:  you're born into a wealthy family who's accumulated financial wealth over decades.  It's stored in various bank accounts.  You and your many siblings don't actually work, but simple draw off the funds.  Your "cost" of those funds is determined to be how much it costs to go to the bank to make a withdrawal.  There's no provisioning for replenishing the accounts. "That's how accounting for the cost of fossil fuels works." (I should have said "pricing", more strictly, but close enough...) Freidman responded with an old economic principle, Hotelling's Law, which provides a theoretical basis for accounting for extractive resource costs, and pointed to a paper of his own as a reference. The main problem is that pricing data for fossil fuels -- and we've got an excellent price history for oil dating to 1860 -- don't reflect this at all. Included in BP's annual review cited above. And in fact if you turn to Friedman's own paper which he presented in support of his argument in this discussion, you'll find: Changes in its price over time will be almost entirely determined by changes in production cost. The good is, strictly speaking, depletable, but that fact has no significant effect on its price. The pattern of oil prices over the past ninety years or so suggests that that may well be how the market views petroleum. http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Price_Theory/PThy_Chapter_12/PThy_Chapter_12.html Hotelling's Law is also soundly dismissed by others, including the generally cornucopian M.A. Adelman. One possibility is that we've been hugely underpricing fossil energy, and that the proper basis should have been to 1) price it at replacement, not access, cost, and 2) allocate it entirely to creating a sustainable or renewable energy infrastructure. There are shades of this concept going back through over 200 years of economic history, including in William Stanley Jevons The Coal Question (1865), earlier works dating to 1789, quite explicitly in US Navy Admiral Hyman G. Rickover's 1957 speech on the future of energy (Rickover is also known as "Father of the Nuclear Navy). It's the idea that underpinned the first suggestions of a nuclear-sourced synthetic fuels program by M. King Hubbert in 1963 (Steinberg's research was published the following year). I've got to admit I'm partial to the idea that oil, coal, and gas should be priced far higher than they are, though I'm not yet convinced. But if it were, it would mean that we should have been pricing energy at far higher rates. Electricity at the net of hydro, wind, solar, and geothermal sourcing. Fuels at the costs associated with biomass or synthesis. And those costs are baked into the prices of everything in the economy as their basis. Increasing transport, heat, and industrial energy costs 80-160-fold would have a massive impact on what's considered to be economically viable. It's also worth noting that throughout the history of petroleum, the market for it has virtually never been free-floating, but that price and or production quantities have been effectively controlled by some entity. There was Standard Oil, the As-Is agreement, the State Extractors (national oil companies), OPEC, the US-Saudi price-setting agreements (used to great effect against the Soviet Union in the 1980s), and commodities traders. Or consider this passage from a den of pinko academics who've blown the cover on the whole party: From 1948 to 1972, the price of oil produced [that is: extracted] in the U.S. was influenced by the production quotas set by the Texas Railroad Commission[1] (RRO). Each month, the RRO (and other state regulatory agencies like it) made forecasts of petroleum demand for the upcoming month and set production quotas to meet the forecasted demand. Source?   Keith Sill. He's ... oh. Chief economist for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Page 1, footnote 1 of "Macroeconomics of Oil Shocks" http://www.phil.frb.org/research-and-data/publications/business-review/2007/q1/br_q1-2007-3_oil-shocks.pdf Daniel Yergin's comprehensive history of petroleum, The Prize, describes various monopolies and cartels generally throughout the work, and the RRO in detail in chapter 13. Very strongly recommended. Imagine the governors of Texas, Oklahoma, and, say, North Dakota calling out the national guard, seizing control of production wellheads, establishing production quotas, and working with the U.S. Department of Interior to enshrine these for 40 years. Because that happened in 1930-31. There's some discussion of this at Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railroad_Commission_of_Texas This also raises a few further questions, key of which are: 1. What's the true meaning of "price", and how should it be established, especially in the case of forseably finite extractives? 2. How do we interpret "the market" and its price discovery process in light of this? The conventional wisdom is that "the market is right", and that market-set prices are inherently correct and efficient. That flies in the face of numerous and widely-known market failures in which full costs (or occasionally benefits) aren't fully priced in, and allocation of goods and services isn't efficient. My view increasingly is that the market is powerful, in that the price-discovery process it entails is exceptionally difficult to fight. But that doesn't make it correct. I've also been intrigued by how freqently Gresham's Law turns up in different corners of economics, and am suspecting that more generally, bad price-discovery mechanisms drive out good. Especially in the classic cases of market failure:  time-inconsistent preferences, information asymmetries, non-competitive markets, principal–agent problems, externalities, or public goods. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_failure 3. What's the relationship between price, cost, and value, particularly as considered with analogs of metabolism (within organisms) or total energy throughput (within populations), and from there to money. The implication is that the very concept of price and cost basis has been tremendously distorted by use of fossil fuels, which is to say, over much of the past 200 years. And, yes, this is ran a bit wide of the whole concept of fuel synthesis, but writing this is helping me formulate some thoughts I've been having on these topics, and there is some relation. Viability So, there remains the question of why there hasn't been more progress or publicity over fuel synthesis. The price/market digression above suggests that a key problem is that the process actually does represent the true real price of fossil fuels, but that exceptionally pervasive (but perverse) price-setting mechanisms. Despite being technically viable and cost-justified on a rational basis, it simply cannot compete against (flawed) market logic. Note that the Navy's interest is an interesting one. Military supplies have a cost basis not based on the market price at source but with the effective delivered cost of materiel. The cost of a gallon of gasoline delivered to Afghanistan is $400 after provisioning and convoying it are accounted for. The Navy's need to supply carrier task forces via oilers across oceans similarly mean that it's not dealing just with a market price of oil but one substantially greater, and the option of provisioning on-site is highly attractive. In a similar example, a proposal to update the engine of the B-52 bomber fleet was revisited when analysts realized that the correct cost basis wasn't of aviation fuel on the ground, but the realized cost when delivered by tanker aircraft for in-air refueling. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/63407-400gallon-gas-another-cost-of-war-in-afghanistan- It could simply be that technical complexities are too great. Fischer-Tropsch itself has been used, but only in Germany (under wartime pressures) and in South Africa. Exploration of the concept in the U.S., during the 1920s, 1930s, and again in the 1950s. None of the efforts were successful, and the 1950s experiment left a record of significant problems. http://web.archive.org/web/20120111183405/http://fossil.energy.gov/aboutus/history/syntheticfuels_history.html https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/29ihl7/us_doe_synthetic_fuel_history_coaltoliquids_and/ Electrolysis seems more viable, it's actually used extensively by the Navy today to provide oxygen aboard nuclear submarines, using the vessel's reactor for electricity generation (I'm not sure what's done with the produced hydrogen). CO₂ separation remains a process under development, and might also present challenges at industrial scale. The thought of processing billions of liters of only marginally filtered seawater through sensitive chemical processes strikes me as prone to multiple issues (fouling, contamination, corrosion, mineral deposits, acquatic growth, etc.). Still, in a world where other energy alternatives, particularly those aimed at delivering energy-dense, convenient, and viable liquid fuels fail to land anywhere near "not obviously batshit crazy", this does strike me as an option that falls within the realm of plausibility. In a world which offers little by way of real promise, this is the most interesting possibility I've run across in decades. http://www.sciencealert.com/audi-have-successfully-made-diesel-fuel-from-air-and-water
Image
+1'd post by Lev OsherovichA study in Nature provides perhaps the best evidence yet that neonicotinoid pesticides disrupt behavior in bumblebees. The EU appears to be correct in restricting the use of neonicotinoids. Here we show that a commonly used insecticide seed coating in a flowering crop can have serious consequences for wild bees. In a study with replicated and matched landscapes, we found that seed coating with Elado, an insecticide containing a combination of the neonicotinoid clothianidin and the non-systemic pyrethroid β-cyfluthrin, applied to oilseed rape seeds, reduced wild bee density, solitary bee nesting, and bumblebee colony growth and reproduction under field conditions. Hence, such insecticidal use can pose a substantial risk to wild bees in agricultural landscapes, and the contribution of pesticides to the global decline of wild bees1, 2, 3 may have been underestimated. The lack of a significant response in honeybee colonies suggests that reported pesticide effects on honeybees cannot always be extrapolated to wild bees ​ See also: http://cen.acs.org/articles/93/i17/Evidence-Against-Neonicotinoids-Mounts.html H/t +Gaythia Weis​​​
Image
+1'd post by Anders Lorenzen in Climate ChangeWhy are UK's main political leaders silent on climate change?
Image
+1'd post by Mike Potter in Google Play MusicPlease, Google, provide support for uploading m3u or wpl playlists.  I have thousands of songs already organized into play lists and I'm not going to duplicate that time and effort.  m3u format has been around for decades.  No excuse to not support it. I've tried uploading my entire Windows Media Player library (which has playlists) from scratch.  Playlists not uploads.  I've tried synching a directory with m3u files.  No luck.  I've tried dragging/dropping m3u files into the Chrome music manager.  Nope. Your new 50,000 limit is great, but without a way to use my existing organization of those songs, your service is not worth the trouble.  I'd even pay for your service if you supported this.
Image
+1'd post by Aldebaran in MotoGP7 more days...tick-tock
Image
+1'd post by Bill Smith in Climate ChangeCalifornia is in the grip of a record drought tied to climate change. This water crisis holds the potential to collapse California’s economy if the state truly runs out of water. What an irony that the state most focused on global warming may be its first victim. California anchors U.S. economy. It has the seventh largest economy in the world, approximately twice the size of Texas. California’s economy is so large and impacts so many other businesses that its potential collapse due to a water crisis will impact the pocketbooks of most Americans. #California #Drought
Image
+1'd post by Christopher Newsom in Google Play Music All AccessI can't believe there is no way to easily select and delete duplicates in your GPM library. Searched the web thoroughly with no success. Any suggestions?
Image
+1'd post by Hannibal Swift in Google Play MusicOkay, so the GMusic uploader doesn't recognise smart playlists in itunes. That means the majority of my playlists will never be able to be uploaded. That's weeks of work to replicate them in GMusic and Google's playlist creator is buggy and unreliable to say the least. Come on, Google, give us a smart playlist creator so we can build them by year or genre or musician.
Image
+1'd post by Edward MorbiusKeep it in the Ground:  The Guardian's campaign urging the world's two biggest charitable funds to move their money out of fossil fuels To Bill and Melinda Gates, founders of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Jeremy Farrar and Sir William Castell, director and chair of the Wellcome Trust: Your organisations have made a huge contribution to human progress and equality by supporting scientific research and development projects. Yet your investments in fossil fuels are putting this progress at great risk, by undermining your long term ambitions. Climate change poses a real threat to all of us, and it is morally and financially misguided to invest in companies dedicated to finding and burning more oil, gas and coal. Many philanthropic organisations are divesting their endowments from fossil fuels. We ask you to do the same: to commit now to divesting from the top 200 fossil fuel companies within five years and to immediately freeze any new investments in those companies. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2015/mar/16/keep-it-in-the-ground-guardian-climate-change-campaign
Image
+1'd post by Trevor Larkum in Electric Vehicles (UK)http://fuelincluded.com/2015/02/london-council-brings-in-parking-surcharge-for-diesel-vehicles/
Image
+1'd post by Louis GrayFriendFeed's Closure Another Painful Loss from a Vibrant Era of Social Media /via +louisgray.com  "If you were part of the active community that made FriendFeed special in those wide-eyed years, you experienced something I've never seen with any community since (with occasional flashes on Google+ and Twitter being exceptions). If you missed it, then you missed out on seeing one of the most talented teams ever assembled working on something that was both fun and smart. And that story's final chapter is coming without us ever getting the happy ending we were hoping for. I'm not mad, just wistful at what might have been. Long live FriendFeed."
Image
+1'd post by Alex M in Google Play Music All AccessHello Google Play Music. I received a new credit card and the old one was invalidated. When trying to change the payment infos for Play Music All Access i get an error message. I've sent various feedback messages to you guys and i also posted a payment issue. All my contact attemts have been ignored. I don't even know if you guys received any feedback.
Image
+1'd post by someswar reddy in Google Cast DevelopersHi All,  I'm trying to cast videos from YouTube application to TV using Chromecast.  I observed that Sometimes YouTube app display duplicate entries as casting targets.  What is the reason behind it, is there any bug with YouTube app or do I need to update any services to prevent this?  Your help is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Lev OsherovichRand Paul, anti-vaxxtard champion In this astonishing interview, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) starts by praising the public health benefits of vaccination then seamlessly transitions to an appeal against mandatory vaccinations based on his personal anecdotal evidence "profound mental disorders" that he attributes to vaccination.  I respectfully suggest that the profound mental disorders that he has observed in his constituents likely have other origins.  I also hope that this clip gets replayed over and over again when Paul runs for president. 
Image
+1'd post by Susan Stone in Climate Change
Image
+1'd post by Kevin KellyIt is what it is.
Image
+1'd post by Rob Ferguson in Google+ UpdatesThis article is about Twitter, and the problems caused by the 'follow the person' social graph being applied to an interests-based network. Every point it raises applies to Google+ ten times over, where the 'noisy feed' problem is even worse.  Why? The large posts here mean the stream can't be scrolled through as quickly as on twitter, and G+ doesn't accommodate the Twitter workaround of being able to create multiple, topic-based accounts. The solutions suggested in the article to improve Twitter, IMO provide a great starting point to consider how to make G+ far more relevant. (The quietly-released Chrome bookmarks app could offer further ideas). The great look and feel of G+'s posts and commenting system need to be supported by a way to curate content and improve signal:noise in the stream. The world doesn't really need another Facebook, which it feels like G+ is still trying to be. It could, and should, be so much better. +Dave Besbris , please sort this out.
Image
+1'd post by Edward MorbiusFish Poop, Snowballs, and why not being evil isn't good enough There's a meme circulating that "Many PEOPLE Did Not Evolve Respect For The Environment Of Their REMOTE ANCESTORS !!!".  As many memes are, this one is wrong, though its sentiments are understandable and even admirable. It's exceptional in the number of levels on which it is wrong. Fish poop in the sea -- and if that's not shitting where you eat, what is?[1]  But let's got back a bit further. Big picture:  what is life, and what is the purpose (if not the meaning) of life? Biological life is a dissipative system:  "a thermodynamically open system which is operating out of, and often far from, thermodynamic equilibrium in an environment with which it exchanges energy and matter."[2]  That is:  living organisms develop complexity within, and often among themselves, in order to utilize existing resources, what I refer to as entropic gradients, which both support the complexity required and increase the net generation of entropy within the system. A crucial element of dissipative systems is that the power flow, the energy flux, is required to sustain the complexity.  Remove or reduce the energy flow, and complexity is reduced, further reducing the net power flow. An entropy gradient may be an energy store, an energy flux, a material resource with useful properties (or some mix of the above), or an arrangement of other systems themselves exploiting entropy gradients. There are additional elements, generally involving self-reproduction, autonomous existence, and heritable characteristics.  Autonomous existence means that what we generally consider life forms have within them the mechanism for their own reproduction -- cells are alive, viruses aren't.  A virus is simply a pattern, a cell is a pattern and the pattern-replicating machinery.  Heritability is generally represented by DNA. Life degrades resources faster than they would in the absence of life.  Which could be called its purpose.  It's certainly its effect. There's a principle called the Darwin-Lotka Energy Law, named by ecologist Howard Odum, which adds the concept of evolution to this entropic relation:.  It states that the maximization of power for useful purposes is the criterion for natural selection.[3] That is:  evolution increases the rate of power throughput, and entropy generation, in the environment.  As life forms (and systems) vary randomly and are subject to selective pressure (Darwin's principle of evolution in a nutshell), the forms which can maximize power throughput thrive over those which cannot.  So not only does life degrade resources, but it seeks to do so at the greatest rate possible. That's a bit of a doozy, more to come. So now we've got: ⚫ Life is a dissipative process, it creates structure to extract negative entropy from the environment. ⚫ Life works by exploiting available entropy gradients.  ⚫ Life evolves through random variation and a selection pressure to maximize power throughput. Snowballs So, human's ancestors couldn't change the environment? Well ... one human predecessor, if not a direct ancestor, were the cyanobacteria which appeared about 2.5 billion years ago.  After about 200 million years, they created the first great atmospheric pollution crisis.  Their metabolic waste product, oxygen, was starting to accumulate in the atmosphere, eventually precipitating what's known as the Great Oxygenation Event, during which atmospheric oxygen increased from roughly zero to first about 5%, then as high as 20-35%, before settling to the 20% value we know today.[4] The results were profound. First off, the cyanobacteria couldn't tolerate living in their own waste product.  They had an anaerobic -- oxygen-free -- metabolism, and were obligate anaerobes, meaning oxygen was not merely useless but toxic to them.  They largely died off (though some remain in isolated environments) or were out-competed by subsequent organisms which could maintain an aerobic metabolism -- which, by the way, is vastly more efficient than an anerobic one.  Yeah: it maximizes power flow.[5][6] Anaerobic organisms today typically operate at about 150 kilojoules (kJ) per mole in fermentation of sugar.  That's about 5% of the rate of an aerobic reaction -- so your aerobes have 20 times the metabolic capacity of anaerobes.  Darwin-Lotka at work.[5] The theories pertaining to how and why oxygen accumulated so slowly at first vary -- chief is that bare iron weathering and oxidation consumed much of it -- but eventually levels rose.  That weathering and oxidation, by the way, is the process humans are reversing, through the addition of energy, when they refine metal ores and oxides to produce free copper, iron, aluminum, and other metals.  Re-winding an entropic clock spring which was wound billions of years ago. One of the first results was to oxidize much of the free methane in the atmosphere, which you may recognize as a greenhouse gas.  This triggered a climate catastrophe known as Snowball Earth[7] -- think the ice world of Hoth -- in which much, and perhaps all of Earth was covered to kilometer depths in ice and glaciers, called the Huronian Glaciation, 2.4 to 2.1 billion years ago.  It is the earliest known ice age, and is thought to be the most severe and longest lasting.[8]  In addition to the oxygenation event, removal of greenhouse gasses, and possibly continental landmass distribution, the solar flux (Sun's brightness) was lower at the time -- as the Sun ages its rate of energy production actually increases gradually, which will eventually pose other problems (in about 800 million to 1.2 billion years). A subsequent Snowball Earth event, the Marinoan glaciation, occurred about 650-635 million years ago, preceding the Cambrian Explosion in which a vast profligation of life-forms emerged, though its cause doesn't seem to be related to biological activity (continental alignment seems to have played a more important factor).  Though it demonstrates that life and glaciation periods can have causality relationships pointing either way.[9] Two more major glaciation periods are thought to have occurred between the Huronian and Marinoan, the Sturtian, 720-660 Mya, and Kaigas, about 750 Mya.  During each substantially the entire Earth was covered in ice sheets a kilometer thick.[10][11] By contrast, the most recent glaciation period (technically we're still in the Quaternary glaciation) affected largely just the Northern Hemisphere, and even then largely northern North America, Europe, and Asia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_glaciation#mediaviewer/File:Northern_icesheet_hg.png The two points of which is that: 1. Life can, does, and has influenced the environment, profoundly, to the point of destroying itself in the process. 2. Those changes set the stage for life-forms to follow.  Humans and the Environment OK, you say, but Dr. Morbius, that's ancient history. Well, technically, it's ancient prehistory, but point taken. Thing is:  humans are life forms (though this is sometimes not immediately apparent), and as with all other life forms affect the environments in which they live. Which includes numerous cases in which environmental changes -- exogenous or endogenous to human activity -- had profound impacts on humans themselves. A good overview of this is Charles L. Redman's 2001 book, Human Impact on Ancient Environments http://www.powells.com/biblio/2-9780816519637-3 From the blurb: By discussing archaeological case studies from around the world -- from the deforestation of the Mayan lowlands to soil erosion in ancient Greece to the almost total depletion of resources on Easter Island -- Redman reveals the long-range coevolution of culture and environment and clearly shows the impact that ancient peoples had on their world. These case studies focus on four themes: habitat transformation and animal extinctions, agricultural practices, urban growth, and the forces that accompany complex society. They show that humankind's commitment to agriculture has had cultural consequences that have conditioned our perception of the environment and reveal that societies before European contact did not necessarily live the utopian existences that have been popularly supposed. Humans have left a trail of environmental destruction behind them throughout history.  Among the reasons for the nomadic lifestyles of many early cultures (and some recent and present ones) is that nomads move their footprint.  After depleting the resources of a given area, they relocate to new grounds, allowing the first to recover.  Desertification, megafauna extinctions, deforestation, erosion, salinization, and other effects have occurred throughout the world when and where humans have entered new or inhabited existing ecosystems.  North Africa, the Fertile Crescent, Greece, Rome, the Indus River Valley, Australia, the Americas, the Mayan, Inca, Aztec, Anasazi, and other new-world civilizations. There've also be exogenous events, of course, and mixed-cause events.  Among the more notable of these was the Late Bronze Age Collapse, 3300-1200 BCE.[12]  First thought to have been the result of climate change, it's now thought that social, cultural, and economic disruptions relating to the rise of ironworking also contributed.  Following it came the rise of the classical Greek and Roman empires. A letter from the last king of Ugarit, a Semitic state, named Ammurapi, to the king of Alasiya, makes clear just how dramatic and desperate the situation was: My father, behold, the enemy's ships came (here); my cities(?) were burned, and they did evil things in my country. Does not my father know that all my troops and chariots(?) are in the Land of Hatti, and all my ships are in the Land of Lukka?...Thus, the country is abandoned to itself. May my father know it: the seven ships of the enemy that came here inflicted much damage upon us.[12][13] The requested help never arrived, Ugarit was burned to the ground. Other periods include the Younger Dryas period (10,800 - 9500 BCE) and Little Ice Age (~1500 - 1800 CE)[14][15] The Blame Game William R. Catton makes this point clear in the introduction to his book Overshoot: Futile Vilification Homo sapiens has not been the first type of organism to experience this vise-tightening [of overcommitted resources and excessive pollution], nor even the first species to inflict upon itself this kind of fate.  Pre-human instances of this common phenomenon hold importan lessons for us, as we shall see.  For mankind, as the pressure intensiies, ignorance of its most fundamental causes (and ignorance of even how common the phenomenon has been in nature) makes it easy to succumb to the temtation to vilify particular human groups an individuals.... While vilification often brings emotional gratification, it brings no solution to our common plight.  Indeed, it aggravates life's difficulties.  Our common plight is not really due to villains.  Too few of a troubled world's proliferating antagonists have known the concepts that would enable them to see the common roots of their own and their supposed adversaries' deprivations.  Under pressure, people retreat from the mutual understanding mankind has so falteringly achieved.  Pressure also makes us disinclined to comprehend the human relevance of nature's impersonal mechanisms.  It behooves some who have borne the pressure only marginally to discern and discuss its nature, that all may stand some chance of abstaining from the plight-worsening actions to which pressure so easily tempts us... There is no point to another morbid wringing of hands over mankind's alleged "greed" or immoral myopia. [16][17] The point isn't that the present threats aren't severe They are.  The rates of atmospheric and climate change are unprecedented in at least the past 800,000 years, and quite likely over millions to hundreds of millions -- the immediate aftermath of the Chicxulub meteor impact which ended the reign of the dinosaurs (birds excepted) 66 million years ago being a notable exception.[18][19] But as Catton points out in the passage above, there's a crucial difference in understanding some moral failing with a fundamental and innate characteristic of biology.  Howard Odum, quoted above, makes an interesting aside in his 1971 book, Environment, Power, and Society Sometimes in half-seriousness we say that man may have been evolved by the system as a mechanism to get the fossil fuels and other minerals back into circulation.  We hope he is pre-adapted for other roles after that.[20] That's pretty much my view. Whalefall Humans are driven by biological, social, cultural, economic, and military dynamics to exploit resources.  To that extent we're rather markedly like deep-sea scavenger communities chancing upon whalefall -- the carcasses of dead whales which sink to the ocean floor.[21][22]  These events represent a tremendous transfer of food energy and resources to a normally barren environment, and a substantial community rapidly coalesces around the carcass, stripping the skin, blubber, muscle, fats and oils, and eventually even the bones of the whale. But when the carcass is gone, a process which can take up to 50 years, there's nothing left to sustain the population, and it must either find another carcass (thought to occur every 5-16 km in the Pacific off the coast of North America), or perish. Humans' whalefall for the past 200 years or so has been the vast wealth of energy represented by fossil fuels in the form of coal, oil, and gas.  It's a short-term resource though, and a one-time bounty.  Over the long term humans' use of fossil fuels is predicted to look somewhat like this:  http://i.imgur.com/9SLxlri.jpg The image is derived from M. King Hubbert's 1956 paper, "Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels"[23] Each of the fossil fuels -- coal, oil, gas -- represents buried ancient sunshine, accumulated over perhaps 500 million years -- which from the history above is most of the period of advanced life on earth.[24]  Certainly for us, and quite possibly over the lifetime of the Earth.  Coal in particular formed as plant matter, with recently developed tough fibers called lignin, died and were buried before decomposers evolved capable of breaking down and metabolizing the tissues.  Humans, in this case, are playing the role of fungi and other decomposers which didn't exist at the time: The large coal deposits of the Carboniferous primarily owe their existence to two factors. The first of these is the appearance of bark-bearing trees (and in particular the evolution of the bark fiber lignin). The second is the lower sea levels that occurred during the Carboniferous as compared to the Devonian period. This allowed for the development of extensive lowland swamps and forests in North America and Europe. Based on a genetic analysis of mushroom fungi, David Hibbett and colleagues proposed that large quantities of wood were buried during this period because animals and decomposing bacteria had not yet evolved that could effectively digest the tough lignin.[25] And: A new study--which includes the first large-scale comparison of fungi that cause rot decay--suggests that the evolution of a type of fungi known as white rot may have brought an end to a 60-million-year-long period of coal deposition known as the Carboniferous period. Coal deposits that accumulated during the Carboniferous, which ended about 300 million years ago, have historically fueled about 50 percent of U.S. electric power generation.[26] In this case, the "coal battery" is one that can only be charged once in the history of the planet.  At the very least it would take tens of millions of years to recharge, and other geological and astronomical events will likely make Earth uninhabitable within this time -- 800 to 1.2 billion years[27]. What separates us from our remote ancestors isn't some innate change in affinity or respect for nature, but a hugely expanded capacity to impose our will upon it Coal, oil, and gas, once we'd worked out how to extract them and transport them effectively (a process which itself involved significant utilization of them) provided, at a low direct cost to humans, an immense energy wealth. That in turn fed a tremendous growth in population (from less than 1 billion in 1800 to 7.1 billion today), in per-capita resource consumption (by 10-20 fold in advanced nations[28]), and in per-capita pollution and effluent production.  All accompanied by a tremendous increases in the complexity of human society, economics, industry, and politics. And if one group doesn't take advantage of the resources, another almost certainly will.  That issue alone has been a major sticking point in climate talks, particularly for China and India, who ask why it is that the US, Europe, Australia, and Japan should have grown wealthy through carbon emissions while they cannot.  Though as the negative consequences of massive fuel consumption become more clear, and China's unbelievable economic boom has absolutely been accompanied by a tremendous increase in fossil fuel use, they've started to revise that view somewhat. http://i.imgur.com/ruZFHnw.jpg The point though is that you cannot simply point a finger to a moral failing or bad people.  It's not the US, or Europe, or China, or India.  It's not, as a friend rants on about, the carniggers, though yes, private fossil-fuel powered transportation used to travel tens of miles daily is not in the least sustainable, even for the only one in seven of people on Earth who own cars, let alone the other 85% of the population (many of whom would very much like to have cars).[29] Most of these people are simply trying to live their lives:  to get to work, buy groceries, raise a family.  But there are enough humans on the planet that that itself is a problem. We've got to come to terms with, to accept, to embrace, and to re-shape our expectations, based on limits. There's an equation which describes the interaction of humans with the environment, called I=PAT[30].    I = impact    P = population    A = affluence (per-capita resource consumption)    T = technology Among other things, it tells us that, other than what we can do through improvements in technology, human impacts are a matter of population and resource consumption.  If you want to reduce impacts, you've got to reduce one, the other, or both of these.  It's a trade off between "how many" and "how rich" (per person, on average). The question of technology and its limits is something I don't want to get into here, though in general I side with those who feel it is limited in its capabilities.  If, as noted, life, humans, economic, and industrial systems exploit existing entropic gradients, then technology can increase the efficiency of that process, but it cannot, of itself, create new entropic gradients.  We cannot simply will new energy sources or mineral resources into being. As to population, estimates vary, but several estimates put humans as requiring the resources of 4-5 Earths on a sustainable basis.  Put another way, this would call for a reduction of population, affluence, or both, to 20-25% of present levels.  Credible estimates of long-term sustainable industrial populations range from 500 million to 2 billion or so -- roughly what the global population was between 1600 and 1920.  There is some range of disagreement on this.[31] Again:  we've got to come to terms with, to accept, to embrace, and to re-shape our expectations, based on limits. But that also means reducing net energy throughput, which means an overall reduction in energy, which means, looking above at dissipative systems, at reducing the overall capabilities of the system as a whole. And that backwards movement is what makes transitioning to a sustainable path so difficult.  Dennis Meadows, who's been studying this area for nearly fifty years, defines this sort of challenge as a hard problem -- in order to make things better, in the long term, things have to get worse for some, or all people, in the short term.  In economics and game theory, researchers talk of "Pareto optimal" or "Nash equilibrium" solutions, in which all parties are made better off.  That's not the case here.[32] This gets to the question of the adjacent possible from Stuart Kauffman[33], for which good descriptions are difficult to find, though this is a good one: The adjacent possible is a kind of shadow future, hovering on the edges of the present state of things, a map of all the ways in which the present can reinvent itself.[34] Essentially, an adjacent possible is a near-and-attainable state. Which raises the possibility of other alternatives, including both distant and unattainable states.  One of the bigger risks humanity faces is that the sustainable state which we seek is not an adjacent possible one, but a non-adjacent, or improbable, state. Which again is why fixating on morality isn't merely inaccurate but actively harmful:  it focuses our attention on the wrong problem. Which if I've got to wrap this all up, is a good way to do so: ⚫ Humans aren't behaving differently from "nature" or "biology" or other life-forms.  We're just tapped into a temporary but tremendous enabling resource. ⚫ Put another way:  the problem isn't that humans are evil. Which means that it's not enough to just be "not evil".  We've to to actively seek out a sustainable path (or we'll have one imposed on us whether we like it or not).  A paperclip maximizer would destroy the Universe.[35]. ⚫ We've got to accept limits.  Including limits to both affluence and population, quite likely to levels well below both present global population and OECD median wealth.  ⚫ There's a tremendous amount of wishful thinking presented on all sides of the limits / environment / resources debate.  I see it from deniers of various stripes, as well as self-proclaimed Greens.  There's short-term gain to be had in promoting fixes or cosmetic changes.  Rearranging deck chairs can come with significant benefits by way of PR, government incentives, or even investor dollars.  It won't keep the RMS Titanic afloat.  I find the Kübler-Ross "stages of grief" model hugely useful in understanding various reactions.[36] ⚫ The process will be painful for all parties involved.  Addressing the equity issues may help in this.  Stating that the consequences are "unacceptable" doesn't keep them from happening.  If you'd polled the passengers and crew of the Titanic on the morning of 14 April 1912 as to whether or not the death of seven in ten of their number was acceptable, they'd doubtless have said "no".  But by 2:30 a.m. the next morning, 68% of them did in fact perish.  Reality is a bitch. ⚫ Top-down (global) and bottom-up (local) options are argued.  Some mix of both may well apply.  A third option is that external (imposed) consequences will force events if no conscious decisions are made. ⚫ If we're going to address the situation through conscious and deliberate action, it's going to require a tremendous amount of awareness of the environment and human's role and relationship to it.  This is unprecedented in all history and biology.  Where humans are unique is in being the first life form self-aware of its own impacts on its environment. ⚫ There's an arbitrariness to this all.  There is no guarantee that humans, or at least our present civilization, will survive.  As Howard Odum noted, we can only hope we're suited to another role after playing through our present one. But what would you be if you didn't even try.  You have to try![37] h/t +John Hummel #sustainability   #environment   #ecology   #population   #LimitsToGrowth   ______________________________ Notes: 1. For a real mind-bender, look up the viral load of the oceans.  On a cellular basis, if you're a cell living in the ocean, you have a one in five chance of dying today.  That is, the daily mortality of cells in the ocean is 20%. http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/1vyanj/viral_soup_and_the_red_queens_race/ http://what-if.xkcd.com/80/ Though I don't know for certain that the viruses either affect fish directly, or if fish poop is a vector, though it seems that it might well be the case. 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissipative_system 3. http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/2hz2lk/darwinlotka_energy_law/ http://www.eoht.info/page/Darwin-Lotka+energy+law http://p2pfoundation.net/Environment,_Power,_and_Society 4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxygenation_Event 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_organism 6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobic_organism 7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_Earth 8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huronian_glaciation 9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinoan_glaciation 10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturtian_glaciation 11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaigas 12. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Bronze_Age_collapse 13. Jean Nougaryol et al. (1968) Ugaritica V: 87–90 no.24 (via Wikipedia) 14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Drya 15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age 16. http://www.powells.com/biblio?isbn=978-0-252-00988-4 17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_R._Catton,_Jr. 18. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater 19. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous%E2%80%93Paleogene_extinction_event 20. Howard T. Odum, Environment, Power, and Society, 1971, p. 101.   http://www.powells.com/biblio?isbn=0471652709 Revised edition, 2007:  http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-9780231128872-2 21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_fall 22. http://www.mbari.org/news/news_releases/2002/dec20_whalefall.html 23. M. King Hubbert, "Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels", Presented before the Spring Meeting of the Southern District Division of Production, American Petroleum Institute Plaza Hotel, San Antonio, Texas March 7-8-9, 1956. http://www.mkinghubbert.com/?q=resources/documents/1956paper See also:  http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/ 24. Jeffrey S. Dukes, "Burning Buried Sunshine: Human consupmtion of ancient solar energy", 2003. http://globalecology.stanford.edu/DGE/Dukes/Dukes_ClimChange1.pdf I recommend this paper (short and quite readable) very highly for those who want a general sense of just how vast present human energy consumption is, particularly with regard to total plant productivity:  "net primary productivity" (NPP), also known as the photosynthetic ceiling.  Human appropriation of NPP, or HANPP, is seen as one of several environmental limits to sustainable populations on Earth.  Given that much present ag productivity is heavily reliant on nitrogen fertilizers (fossil-fuel based), phosphorus (in critically limited supply), pesticides (fossil-fuel based in part), and energy-intensive cultivation, transport, and processing, odds of sustaining present levels of food and other agricultural output over the long term are considered low by many experts. 25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboniferous#Rocks_and_coal 26. "Study on Fungi Evolution Answers Questions About Ancient Coal Formation and May Help Advance Future Biofuels Production" http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=124570 27. "Timeline of the Far Future", particularly failure of C4 photosynthesis in 800 million years, increased solar flux in 1 billion years, and carbon dioxide starvation in 1.3 billion years.  We are living in the late afternoon of life on Earth.  It is possible that more distant planets or moons might remain suitable for life.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future#Future_of_the_Earth 28. Gregory Clark, A Farewell to Alms, chapter 1: http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8461.html 29. "World Vehicle Population Tops 1 Billion Units" http://wardsauto.com/ar/world_vehicle_population_110815 30. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_%3D_PAT 31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation#Carrying_capacity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity#Humans 32. "Hierarchy of Failures in Problem Resolution" http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/2fsr0g/hierarchy_of_failures_in_problem_resolution/ Meadows' phrase appears in an address he made to the Smithsonian, "Dennis Meadows - Perspectives on the Limits of Growth: It is too late for sustainable development", at 42m22s http://fixyt.com/watch?v=f2oyU0RusiA "There are easy problems and hard problems.  Imagine two actions.  For easy problems, the actions which actually solve the problem make it look better over the short term.  The next evaluation is the next election, or your quarterly earnings report, the next time someone's going to evaluate what you're doing.  The market and politics deals with these problems quite well.  Unfortunately, in dealing with sustainability, we're not dealing with easy problems but with hard ones.  Ones which require a sacrifice now in return for benefits later.  The actions which solve those problems over the long term make things look worse in the short term.  We need to increase the price of energy now in order for it to be lower later.  We need to reduce certain types of economic activity now in order to slow climate change in order to have more flexibility for industrial activity later.  Unfortunately, the next evaluation comes long before we can take credit for the fundamental solutions.  And we're stuck in a system now where politics and the market systematically drive us over the cliff." 33. "Autonomous Agents and Adjacent Possible Theory (AAAPT) of Stuart Kauffman" http://www.theoryofmind.org/pieces/AAAPT.html 34. http://www.practicallyefficient.com/home/2010/09/28/the-adjacent-possible 35. http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Paperclip_maximizer 36. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model 37. In the immortal words of Lyell Lovett:  "Please, if it's not too late...Make it a cheeseburger!" http://fixyt.com/watch?v=KvDPezXTzlI
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius"There's a special part of hell reserved for the snake oil selling charlatans who push some woo called Reversed Maslow's hierarchy of needs." It's much loved by people who talk about "The Secret", life style coaches and executive training. "Be a nice self-actualised person, you'll be full of esteem which will allow you to love others who won't threaten your safety and so the universe will fulfill your bodies needs." +Julian Bond commenting on an earlier post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/104092656004159577193/posts/QWPNq7HYWCF While I'll allow for those who argue for a simplified existence based on meeting the essentials for life (Thoreau and Leopold come to mind), pretense that one can build a castle entirely on clouds are either selling a hoax, or delusional.
Image
+1'd post by John PoteetQuoting: "If the United States of America insists on calling itself exceptional, then it must be the exception.  And there is nothing exceptional about torture, it is all too horribly common in the world. The United States holds up as its greatest triumphs the defeat of tyranny great and small, from the Nazis and the Empire of Japan to Baby Doc Duvalier to Manuel Noriega to Saddam Hussein.  And those who rage and bellow, who invoke the name of their God and their sandaled prophet to decry the supposed moral decline of modern America, are the very ones who today cheer the immorality of torture most vigorously." We're no better than our worst enemy until we prosecute these torturers and the people that ordered them to do it and covered up the torture.  You know what? The Christian Taliban, the "Tea Party," Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and all the noisemaker excusing torture: they will torture you also. Not because you did something wrong, or you're a terrorist or have a terrorist roommate. Because the fear and sickness inside of them is never satisfied by appeasement. It just gets worse until good people put them back in their place.  
Image
Image
+1'd post by Richard Anthony Johnson in Climate ChangeWhere's civilization heading?  Will our lifestyles have a severe impact upon the planet, environment and ultimately us as a species?  According to an article in Scientific American, we could experience this as soon as the middle of this century: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/apocalypse-soon-has-civilization-passed-the-environmental-point-of-no-return/
Image
+1'd post by John PoteetI've had my disagreements with +David Roberts but here he's so right on the money it hurts. We have a very deep problem with conservative reality denial in the U.S..  http://grist.org/politics/david-roberts-explains-postmodern-conservatism-in-36-tweets/ Go to the article and read it. Please share. Comment's closed here.  via +Gregory Esau 
Image
+1'd post by David Schmidt in Developing with Google+Can everyone please star this issue? It's annoying the crap out of me.
Image
+1'd post by Antero Hanhirova in Developing with Google+Is it really so that Google+ Activities list() is not in any particular order? Or is it just me?
Image
+1'd post by Raymond Chan in Google+ UpdatesInput picture or link preview in comments. When a link is posted to a Google+ topic, there is a preview of the link. I would like the same thing for the inline comments that follow. So if a person comments on a link I share with another link or comment, it shows up previewed instead of just showing the URL. 
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic Explorationshttp://www.npr.org/2014/11/09/361384510/first-listen-andy-stott-faith-in-strangers#playlist
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic ExplorationsNovember just started, but I already got my favorite track of the month. #Lakker   #MountainDivide  
Image
+1'd post by Yonatan Zunger in Brief DispatchesI am really disappointed that this is not an actual book. I would keep it on my desk at work, just to alarm the new people. The source is here, and this entire blog is full of awesome: http://scarfolk.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/ritual-invasive-mind-control-mayflower.html
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingShakey Byrne #67 Wins the 2014 BSB Title What a fantastic race from the (now) 4 times Superbike Champion & 5 times British Champion.  Top work from Shakey & the PBM Team. Full report to follow later Full Report : http://www.britishsuperbike.com/news/byrne-wins-race-two-to-seal-record-breaking-fourth-title.aspx Write up from @PaddockChatter to follow : http://www.paddockchatter.com/2014/10/bsb-byrne-secures-fourth-championship.html?m=1 _______________________________________________ +Official BSB  #BSB   +British Superbike Championship  +britishsuperbike +Big Ed  #Brands    +MSVR 
Image
+1'd post by Edward MorbiusThree Limits to Growth (Herman Daly) Economist Herman Daly identifies three situations which establish limits to growth:  The "futility limit", where marginal utility of production falls to zero (it's literally futile to produce more); the ecological catastrophe limit, at which there's a profound increase in marginal costs; and the economic limit, where net benefit is maximized as marginal utility and cost are equalized. All three derive from basic microeconomics. h/t +Ugo Bardi  http://steadystate.org/three-limits-to-growth/
Image
+1'd post by John HardyIndeed. Why is Ayn Rand still a thing? A remarkable feature of the vacuousness of contemporary political thought that this reactionary fossil is still being talked about. Has anyone ever watched the movie The Fountainhead? It's unintentionally hilarious.
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingFantastic. Scott Redding gets a full fat RCV .... with Marc VDS Racing What great news.  Scott on a factory RCV with his team +MVDSRacingTeam  Brad on a Satellite M1 with #Tech3   Cal on a factory RCV with #LCR   Fingers crossed Camier also stays in GP's on a good machine too. This link via @PaddockChatter on Twitter. +MotoGP  #MotoGP   +MVDSRacingTeam  +HondaProRacing  +GresiniRacing  +Alpinestars +Shark Helmets UK   
Image
+1'd post by Edward MorbiusBig Problems: Why can't we solve them (and what are they anyway?) I've run across a few essays on Big Problems that I've been meaning to post. While stewing some more musings, here is ... A compendium of references to +Jason Pontin and +Peter Thiel, Justin Kraus, George Packer's Unwinding, and a few thoughts from Edward the Peculiarly Bad Entertainer. At the dreddit:  http://reddit.com/r/dredmorbius http:// http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/2fg0vd/big_problems_why_cant_we_solve_them_and_what_are/ #BigProblems   #dreddit  
Image
+1'd post by Edward Morbius
Image
+1'd post by katya austin in Sci-FIOne of my favorite hard Sci-Fi books (and in places really hard), Very well written and deeply researched, Blindsight is a mediation on the nature of consciousness, different ways of perceiving reality, evolution, biology and transhumanism and how truly alien alien life could be. In my mind, this book ranks up there with the classics like Rendezvous with Rama, The Mote in God's Eye, and Gateway. Official description: _Two months have past since a myriad of alien objects clenched about the Earth, screaming as they burned. The heavens have been silent since—until a derelict space probe hears whispers from a distant comet. Something talks out there: but not to us. Who should we send to meet the alien, when the alien doesn’t want to meet?   Send a linguist with multiple-personality disorder and a biologist so spliced with machinery that he can’t feel his own flesh. Send a pacifist warrior and a vampire recalled from the grave by the voodoo of paleogenetics. Send a man with half his mind gone since childhood. Send them to the edge of the solar system, praying you can trust such freaks and monsters with the fate of a world. You fear they may be more alien than the thing they’ve been sent to find—but you’d give anything for that to be true, if you knew what was waiting for them_. . . . distributed under Creative Commons license, but you can also buy this book on Amazon, if you're so inclined enjoy :) #freereads #freebooks #scifi #ebooks #peterwatts  
Image
+1'd post by H.T.V. Blu in Motorcycle Roadracing
Image
+1'd post by Артем Клочков in Google+ UpdatesAdd please the ability to insert a photos, clips and links in the comments. As it is in the first message. This gives to the users a lot of the new function. They will be able to post reviews, stories and etc. 
Image
+1'd post by Sabine Klare in Winamp & Music VisualizerLast.fm throws page-loading-errors since 3 days, my blogs there cannot be accessed. I want to link to my Facebook-Notice instead. The "Further Stuff from June 2014" is the newest, but also my .xml-files will be very interesting... :-)
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingOne Hundred and fifteen. No fuel This was a mind blowing lap. Really impressive. Here is food for thought for Mr +Keith Williams, this flying lap is only 8mph slower then Foggys lap record from '92 on the mighty 0W01. WOW Nice Blog site I'm posting here. Not seen it before until today, but it's very dedicated. +Official Isle of Man TT #IOMTT #TT #TT2014 +HondaProRacing +Honda Motorcycles & ATVs #Mugen +Alpinestars +Feridax
Image
+1'd post by Kevin KellyBikes on the road should have different rules. Really. They should be allowed to have rolling "stops" for one. The reason most bicyclist don't follow the rules for cars is that they are stupid for bikes. We need traffic rules that work for bicycles, so those laws can be followed and enforced. If they aren't changed the laws will just continued to be broken, which helps no one. Pedestrians, cars and bikes would be better off if we had appropriate rules for bikes. Good argument here: http://www.vox.com/2014/5/9/5691098/why-cyclists-should-be-able-to-roll-through-stop-signs-and-ride
Image
+1'd post by Sarath Chandra Gullapalli in Google+ UpdatesA page where we can see all the Google+ posts that have been +1'd on the past. Currently, we can see only the links of external websites that have been +1'd in the past. Adding the list of Google+ posts to that list would be great.
Image
+1'd post by Gail TverbergPlanned natural gas exports amount to 60%+ of current natural gas production, and we are still a natural gas importer! http://ourfiniteworld.com/2014/03/31/the-absurdity-of-us-natural-gas-exports/
Image
+1'd post by Massimo Luciani in Sci-FIR.I.P. Lucius Shepard :-(
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic ExplorationsThe best of #Lakker  I have heard to date. From their new album #ContainingAThousand  
Image
+1'd post by Warren Deer in Google+ Updates Dear Google+ please make it easier to find the things I've commented on, cheers.
Image
+1'd post by Gail TverbergWhy is the problem of upcoming Limits to Growth so well hidden? A difficult story, no one wanting to hear, and some mistakes in interpretation. http://ourfiniteworld.com/2014/02/06/limits-to-growth-at-our-doorstep-but-not-recognized/
Image
+1'd post by joel huebner in Google+ UpdatesI would like to be able to organize communities by "type or group" much like you do to people w/ circles... 
Image
+1'd post by Dave ShevettOkay, since Google abandoned latitude (YOU KNOW, a WORKING PRODUCT), and replaced it with "Plus will do this!" (YOU KNOW, a PRODUCT THATS NOT COMPLETE), I find myself missing having a decent "track my friends location" app.   Something that works on Android and IOS.   Any suggestions?
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingBest site won. Great work. Congratulations +David Emmett & team.
Image
+1'd post by Nate Cress"Google Music to Add Upload Feature" Now wouldn't it be even better if Google Play Music was a Chrome App that could also play local files while giving the option of adding/uploading them to your library? Also how about support for more than 20,000 audio files for those with large digital libraries?
Image
+1'd post by Tim Groeneveld in Developing with Google+Hi Google+ devs, I just wanted to let you all know that I think it's near damn crazy that two years after Issue #41 was added into your issue tracker, for some reason, the developers at the Google+ team have still not added write access to the Google+ platform for us 'normal' folks. Hootsuite gets access with Google+ Pages write access, yet other developers - like me - are just left out in the dark. We want to support the Google+ platform, yet thanks to one of the largest Internet companies, we are essentially cock blocked from being able to write to streams in g+. Facebook? They love us, we can write to pages using their API. Twitter? Same deal, tweet away. Foursquare? Yup. Hell, even Orkut's API allowed you write activities. +Thor Carpenter, you said on the issue that you are happy to talk about this openly as long as the discussion was left out of the issue tracker. Why is this issue not resolved after all this time? The functionality must be hidden away there somewhere.
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle Roadracing#Moto2 - News. Gino Rea confirmed as full time rider for Team AGT Rea Racing. Good luck to them.
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic ExplorationsNew from #Akkord  and it's fucking good
Image
+1'd post by Robert LlewellynA Simple Message From Mr Frack Last week I attended a conference in London called 'Energy Live.' I was there as a guest speaker and felt out of depth the moment I entered the venue. This was a gathering of leaders in the field of energy supply and distribution, massive gas and oil corporations, industrial scale solar and wind companies, the national grid, renewable investment funds, you name it, the big guns were there. It was a day of seminars and panel discussions ranging across all manner of topics related to the future of energy, where it might come from and how we distribute and use it. Just before I was due to appear a rather scowling but hugely enigmatic and entertaining man called Chris Faulkner took to the stage. Mr Faulkner is the Founder and CEO of the Dallas-based Breitling Energy Company. They frack. They frack like hell, if there's one thing Mr Faulkner loves, it's fracking. He was forceful, funny, dogmatic, dismissive and enormously entertaining. His obvious dislike of environmental activists was exposed with charm and wit, this guy was a brilliant speaker, a fantastic figurehead for an industry with a fairly severe PR problem in the UK. He argued the case for fracking as well as anyone possibly could, the enormous economic benefit the American economy has experienced since fracking was introduced on a truly massive scale. The decrease in coal burning at power stations, the increase in manufacturing and jobs in all sectors. The vast amounts of tax the fracking companies have paid to the government both at a state and federal level. Due to the success of the process the cost of gas has fallen through the floor, so much so that's it's currently not worth a company like Mr Faulkner's investing in new drilling sites in the USA. So guess what folks, they want to do it here. I was surrounded by a lot of people who work in the fossil fuel industry in one way or another, you would think he was preaching to the converted and although he got laughs, won rounds of applause it didn't seem like he'd fully convinced people. He left the stage to tumultuous applause and he deserved it, he was a Texan showman bedecked in Cuban heeled boots and rhinestone cufflinks. There is no denying it, Mr Faulkner is exactly what a Brit audience wants from an American oil man. No punches pulled, shoot from the hip, speak your mind, fracking is the future people, get used to it. Then I was introduced, a bumbling wet liberal electric car driving, solar panel owning middle class English pillock. As I said to the audience when I took the stage, 'back in '87 I had to follow Robbie Coltrane at a big benefit concert in Edinburgh where the audience was 99% Scottish, I thought that was a tough gig!' Believe me, that was nothing compared to following Mr Fracker. I did my best, he'd set the tone, he'd raised the bar. It was all or nothing, instead of bumbling and being apologetic went in six shooters blazing. I suggested that while the immediate economic benefits of drilling and burning were undeniable, we might be at a pivotal point in the great human story where we needed to stop burning stuff. While it might be possible to safely drill through the water table and pump highly toxic fluids deep underground to desperately try and extract the last vestiges of hydrocarbons from the planet, there just might be a longer term downside. While it is foolish not to consider all the options available to us after the chronic failures of all governments over the last 25-30 years to prepare for the energy gap we are now facing, maybe fracking should be put on the back burner for now. Now I'm not going to pretend I can remember everything I said, I know at one point I talked about drilling in my garden and fracking the hell out of my home and shitting all over my grandchildren's lives, I now recall that moment with some shame. Yes, it got a laugh but that kind of cheap reaction to the massive and powerful industry that Mr Faulkner represents is not constructive. Thankfully I also suggested we concentrate instead on developing massively distributed, local, individual and community owned power generating networks, grid level storage and and a non drill and burn attitude to sustainable energy production. I may have mentioned that 97% of new power generation capacity in Germany is not owned by  mainstream utilities, meaning quite simply that it's owned by the people who use the power. A distributed system like this is more reliable, more robust, less vulnerable to attack or mass blackouts, more able to adapt to new technologies, the list goes on and on. What was truly encouraging was the response my rather unfocused and over emotional tirade got from this very professional and well informed group. It felt very positive. Maybe they were just being polite to an old bloke but I think there is something bigger going on. People in the industry and particularly engineers understand that we need to start doing something radically different to the old model. I can only hope that they succeed. But seriously, respect to Mr Faulkner, the simplicity of the model is undeniable. Frack, extract gas, sell it cheap, make a shit ton of cash, screw Mr Putin, screw the Saudi's and experience an economic boom. Hell, you only live once. Drill and burn baby. Drill and burn.   
Image
+1'd post by Duarte Molha in Google+ UpdatesMany people used to say that Google did not understand the fundamentals of social networks and that this was the reason they had not gotten a successful social product... Before g+. After a few years (over a decade) being a avid Google services user I have to disagree. The fundamental problem is not that Google does not understand social networks... It is that Google does not understand communication... This might seem like a crazy statement to make given they have the most used email client and the most advanced communications platform in the form of android... However Google does not understand what users want in terms of communication modes and the development of the Google hangouts app for android is a perfect example of that. They first split the way in which we could reach Google users by releasing an new app called Google plus messenger that would do essentially the same thing as Google talk ... Then after many months of frustration they finally got rid of the two and released the hangouts app... But without including one of the best features of the Google talk app - the talk bit. Yes they killed one of their best features - VoIP with any Google user at the press of a button - a feature that, to this day, has not yet been reinstated. They also killed the online/offline status indicator although they finally fixed that. Then they announced that they would integrate the SMS communications but after a long time waiting for it the only thing they did was to merge the 2 streams in a long list instead of integrating SMS as a communication mode for fallback communication with users that are either offline or have not yet joined g+. How much longer will we have to wait before Google understands what we need in terms of communication modes.... Came on Google... Hurry up already
Image
+1'd post by Claire O'Keeffe in Google+ UpdatesIn communities, put a leave button right where the join button is. I shouldn't have to go looking for it.
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingYES! #BSB & +Eurosport English to continue until 2020. Excellent news. Congratulations to @charliehiscott & the @EuroSportUKTV team. +British Superbike Championship +britishsuperbike
Image
+1'd post by Alex Reusch in Google+ UpdatesGoogle+, Groundhog Day? Well, that's how I feel actually, because I think I have asked this question many times already: Locations, anyone? When do we get the lost iOS buddies back on board? When will we see a consistent user experience across all the platforms? Any plans of #Locations  for the desktop? Dear +Google, please help me out here!
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle Roadracing3rd time lucky. #WSB  must give up now on Laguna. I ABSOLUTELY  love LEGUNA SEGA, i really do. Proper track but fucking shocking circuit.  This #WSB event is becoming a total joke. Sadly +Laguna Seca should never be used after today.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Zolynski in Google+ UpdatesG+ has many unnecessary duplicated communities. How about providing a merge feature for them? One community owner may suggest a merger with another community and if it's accepted by its owner, all posts and members are merged together. (+/- questions about who owns the new community) (+/- anti-spam features)
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingMoto2 news Redding signs for Gresini. Good work Scott.
Image
+1'd post by Edward MorbiusEnergy, risks, portrayal, and distortions Ryan Carlyle, a petroleum engineer, has posted another of his informative but typically skewed contributions to Quora, that forum best known for its highly annoying register-to-view policy (I've found creating throwaway accounts using Mailinator useful for this purpose, when I'm sufficiently arsed to view stuff there). As per usual, Ryan distorts his response through a mix of misinformation, omission, and failing to consider many of the peculiar aspects of risk as posed by nuclear power.  Though she does so with great skill and in a well-documented-and-researched manner which I have to admire, if not fully applaud.  This post may correct some of those errors. First:  I've run across Ryan Carlyle on Quora before, and while he's well informed, he's not unbiased, and some of his facts and assumptions are incorrect and/or skew his responses. Secondly:   There simply isn't enough uranium and plutonium to run the world's existing electrical demand for more than a few years.    Tom Murphy, UCSD physicist and author of the "Do the Math" blog concludes:  "we would deplete our resource in a mere 6 years if we required conventional nuclear power to be our sole source of energy!" http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2012/01/nuclear-options/ You can get around theses limitations, maybe, by turning to unconventional fuels and designs:  thorium power plants, maybe if we've been blessed by living in the right universe, fusion power (but don't hold your breath).  However in each case we lose key advantages touted for 4th generation nuclear plant designs:  we're treading in unknown territory with unknown failure modes and consequences. Third:  As horrible as coal is (and it will destroy life on Earth as we know it, and as is necessary to sustain modern civilization, if we continue using it), coal power plants have pretty well-known and limited failure modes.  Coal mining is a risky business for the miners and can lay waste to vast areas of land, and literally tear down mountains.  Mine tailings can fill valleys and destroy villages.  The pollution is bad, and mercury from coal plants is a, if not the, primary source of mercury contaminating fish in the world's oceans, making many literally unfit for human consumption. But on the positive side -- that's about as bad as it gets.  Coal plants don't suddenly morph into a vastly more monstrous version of themselves as nuclear plants have been occasionally known to do.  Cut off the supply of coal and the fire burns out.  The materials from which furnaces and boilers are constructed don't mysteriously transmutate over time.  And of course, the combustion products reach a stable state within a few minutes or hours, not years, decades or centuries (though, yes, it may take that long for CO2 to work its way out of the atmosphere and oceans).  Nuclear waste storage may be a solvable problem, but in over 50 years of commercial operation, it still hasn't been satisfactorily solved.  Admittedly, largely for political reasons, but admitting this still doesn't solve the problem. And of course, radioactive materials, even plant structures, can be used in weapons, radiological bombs if not nuclear explosives. Fourth:  Among the most prevalent issues with nuclear plants, totally independent of plant design, is management.  And if MBAs aren't scary enough for you, it turns out that among the management interests in Fukushima is the Yakuza -- the Japanese  Mafia: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/japan-earthquake-and-tsunami-in/9084151/How-the-Yakuza-went-nuclear.html A common element in virtually every nuclear disaster or near-disaster has been poor management practices, from preparation to training to drills to emergency procedures to cover-ups.  I've interviewed senior management of a nuclear utility who volunteered without my asking, to my face, that the plant had been badly managed.  And I've continued to see major foulups in the years since (at other facilities, thankfully). Even without management problems, the challenge in assessing and addressing problems whose full nature and extent can take years to evolve is immense.  At Fukushima, containment of radioactive materials is grossly complicated by general loss of reactor containment (the degree of which still hasn't been fully assessed), siting along a sea coast, the need to cool still-hot radioactive fuel, and groundwater flows through the plant zone itself.  At Chernobyl, the concrete sarcophagus entombing the reactor core is known to be leaking, is vulnerable to earthquakes, and plans are to entomb the tomb in yet another block of concrete, 108 meters (30 stories) tall, weighing 29,000 tons (that's 41 gWh of energy represented in the concrete alone).  Construction is planned to start in 2015, almost 30 years after the initial accident. http://rt.com/news/chernobyl-new-safe-confinement-773/ Fifth:  The long tail of nuclear accidents means that a meaningful measurement of impacts is difficult to account for.  Studies are now turning up an increase in thyroid cancers in Europe, numbering in the thousands, 25 years after the accident. http://www.voanews.com/content/un-reports-thousands-of-thyroid-cancers-25-years-after-chernobyl-nuclear-disaster-117088228/170514.html And while Ryan notes that total deaths are modeled to number roughly 4,000 (itself subject to dispute), they're occurring over the populations of Russia, Ukraine, and Europe, with some 500 million inhabitants, none entirely sure whether or not they will or will not be affected.  Again, risks from conventional and renewable energy sources tend to be far more localized. And of course, the exclusion zones around Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Hanford will remain in place for at least a century, if not centuries. As has been pointed out:  solar plant meltdowns and wind spills don't put populations of tens to hundreds of millions at risk.  The last major outrage I saw was over a rare bird killed when it ran into a turbine blade (sad, but hardly an international disaster).  The consequences of Japan's nuclear accident threatened the energy supply of the entire country as it shut down its nuclear plants, and is still undergoing a prolonged political debate about how it will power its future.  It seems likely that nuclear energy will play a role, as Japan is especially impoverished when it comes to indigenous energy sources, a prime motivator in the country's embarking on World War II, and factor shaping much of its industrial and economic policy and history since. Unlike the case of a dam failure Ryan presents, a nuclear accident doesn't pose risks which are readily identified by the public or news media.  Water flows down established channels, the risk applies to those in the floodplain, and it's very much evident when the danger is present, when it's passed, and even how to take reasonable countermeasures (don't build directly in floodplains, provide water channels, seek high ground or upper floors).  Even the context of the Fukushima disaster, the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, demonstrated that people utterly surrounded by the tsunami were safe so long as the were 1-2 stories or more above the water in buildings of sturdy (largely:  steel-frame or concrete block) construction and solid foundations.  And you can verify this yourself in hundreds of hours of YouTube videos.  The uncertainty of a nuclear incident is a huge part of the damage profile presented.  In combination with the virtual guarantee of mismanagement and trust breakdowns, nuclear faces grave public distrust and resistance. Sixth:  Much of the risk for coal is in mining operations.  In the first part of the 20th century, US mining accidents claimed over 1500 lives annually, over the past decade the average is closer to 35.  China's mines claim thousands of lives per year.     Assuming we do find lower-yield uranium ores, odds are that there will be much more intensive mining operations, meaning more workers and hours per kg of useful fuel produced.  Likely driving up mining deaths.  A factor not considered in Ryan's essay. Seventh:  A false choice is offered.  Ryan likes to characterize fossil and nuclear as the only options capable of fueling human civilization.  There's absolutely no denying that the challenge is difficult, and I am concerned that we don't have a good long-term alternative.  However, on a raw flux basis, sunlight reaching Earth's surface delivers many times the present energy consumption of the human race.  And costs of solar photovoltaics have been falling about 20%/year since the 1970s, a trend which continues and looks likely to continue for the forseable future.  That means they're reduced by half every 3 years or so. Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable sources could conceivably provide the mix of power necessary to run civilization, and there are proposed plans (e.g., Jacobson and Delucchi: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-path-to-sustainable-energy-by-2030) to provide 100% of our energy needs from renewables.  It won't be cheap or easy, bit it's technically possible. I'm more than willing to point out that this proposal lacks storage, and doesn't do much for transportation fuels, though others have addressed at least part of that problem (frankly, I think we'll find we're using fewer transport services).  I also suspect we'll address some of the shortfall by supporting far fewer people, I'd strongly suggest watching Sir David Attenborough's excellent RSA presentation on population:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sP291B7SCw Storage likely can be addressed through various means (large, cheap batteries based on molten salt or liquid metals -- not the sort of thing you'd want around the house, but doable), flywheels, compressed air, thermal storage.  Perhaps even chemical storage, including liquid fuels synthesis, though that's an admitted stretch. Summarizing:  I'm absolutely no fan of coal: the sooner it's phased out the better.  However nuclear faces very considerable challenges, including fuel availability and proving the reliability of new designs.  And renewable technologies offer safety records for the general public much lower than that of nuclear, and far more predictable overall.  Meantime, we'd best get bloody damned serious about figuring out how we're going to power our future, and just how many people we plan on accounting for while we're at it. h/t to +Yonatan Zunger for the link, much discussion on his post: https://plus.google.com/103389452828130864950/posts/fb6ZLgir1bJ Note (Nov 11, 2013):  I'd somehow gotten the impression that Ryan Carlyle was female.  This appears not to be the case.  I've corrected my post, but some of the discussion reflects this earlier error on my part.
Image
+1'd post by Massimo Di Dato in Electric Bicycles (Bikes)
Image
+1'd post by Dan GillmorJust surreal: Obama said last Friday he'd order an outside, independent review of NSA. Today he named James Clapper, the head of national intelligence who lied to Congress (a felony), to look into what his own people have been doing.  The Onion could not possibly match this announcement. Here's the text: DNI Clapper Announces Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies At the direction of the President, I am establishing the Director of National Intelligence Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies to examine our global signals-intelligence collection and surveillance capability. The Review Group will assess whether, in light of advancements in communications technologies, the United States employs its technical collection capabilities in a manner that optimally protects our national security and advances our foreign policy while appropriately accounting for other policy considerations, such as the risk of unauthorized disclosure and our need to maintain the public trust. The Review Group will brief its interim findings to the President within 60 days of its establishment, and provide a final report with recommendations no later than Dec. 15, 2013. Note that the "review" mentions nothing about civil liberties and privacy. Is this the pinnacle of mendacity for Obama? Hard to come up with a better example.
Image
+1'd post by Uwe Rüdiger in Developing with Google+Hello Developers. I will write you at this place because many people are angry about the fact that Latitude was retired and there are many bugs and "downgrades" in G+ we thinks as users, let me explain: First WE NEED TIMESTAMPS at Locations/Places for friends when the user has sent his last position! Second the position has to be updatet JUST-IN-Time, when you look at locationhistory and see your current position this is not refreshed in G+, the refresh button does not seem to work and doesnt use GPS for the position to refresh nor WIFI. Third: do you use the cache from Maps? I think that G+ everytime gets a new maps tile and does not take it from maps, and when G+ is closed the G+ cache is cleared and after reopen it will reload it from mobile connection. Thats not good for mobile flatrates or less connections, please use the maps cache or if not possible create your own cache for G+. AND PLEASE HAVE A LOOK AT THE COMMUNITY, many people think that you will not have a look and dont hear our suggestions so they went away or are frustrated like me not to hear something from Google.
Image
+1'd post by Mel HallWith the retirement of Latitude, is there any way to access Google+ Locations via PC?
Image
+1'd post by Emma DingleReally missing Google Latitude already, how else can people navigate in real time towards friends and vice versa? Is there a setting to choose who shares their location with me, I have a number of randoms all over the UK and USA on G+ Locations at the moment. :/
Image
+1'd post by Alex Reusch in Google+ HelpLocations, anyone? Latitude is gone and so I lost all my iOS buddies. Hello Google? Where is the promised update? How about all the missing features of Latitude? The current state of Locations is just a bad joke...
Image
+1'd post by Matthew GoguenThanks google for removing latitude on the iPhone without updating g+ 1st.
Image
+1'd post by Ken DavisGoogle+ locations is not even a "poor" replacement for latitude. Google, what are you thinking? Good gravy!
Image
+1'd post by Dennis KGoogle plus Locations is the worst excuse for a Latitude replacement! It's useless!
Image
+1'd post by Nicholas Gallman#Google+ #Locations is ZERO replacement for #latitude . This really sucks. Just as my son gets his driver's license, too. I was really counting on this service once the kids started to drive. Oh well. #Google  is officially #stupid . #DieHard #Android #Fan hatin' #Google right now! Why hasn't +Marques Brownlee commented on this, yet? Or did I miss it??
Image
+1'd post by Rich WhiteWay to go Google. Discontinue latitude for Google Maps and force everyone to use Google Plus locations instead and then forget to make locations in Google+ actually work. The map doesn't load. :'( Glad I had a titanium backup of the old Google Maps so I can still use latitude.
Image
+1'd post by simon OrmeLatitude's missing replacement. I've been trying the latitude replacement and I've given up.  Way too complicated even when you're holding another person's device. How many steps?  And it still doesn't work.  And then there is no location tab on the desktop version of g+.  Looks like latitude was retired before the replacement was properly implemented.  Any alternatives out there? 
Image
+1'd post by James Fridley in Google+ UpdatesGot to hope the future apps will be more consistent across devices...
Image
+1'd post by Sean S in Google+ UpdatesFeature request: Add location to a post.   I would like to be able to add a location to a post.  You'd be able to add a location manually (desktop and mobile), by GPS (mobile), or by "lived in" information on your profile page (desktop and mobile).   You'd have the option of a specific GPS coordinate or a general location such as city, state.   Users would be able to find posts in their area (right now it's limited to mobile).   Another feature that could come from this is to be able to share a post to "Public (local)", where only users near you will be able to see these posts.  
Image
+1'd post by Kristian KöhntoppUnbreaking my location sharing workflow So my mother is using a Galaxy Nexus, and so do I. My dad has an iPhone, and so has my brother. We are all on Google plus, and we have been using Latitude, a lot. Now, I understand that with the iOS dev center breakage, the Latitude sundown may be before Location Sharing is available for Apple users. But that still leaves open Location sharing with a map on the desktop. Is Maps getting a Location sharing layer that consolidates the data like the Location tab in the Android G+ App? Or will this become part of Google plus, somehow? Does Google have any plans for that at all? I have not seen any Location sharing announcements from Google regarding the desktop. Will this happen before Latitude Sundown, even? I am getting a bit nervous, and so is the iOS using part of my family, which is urging me to look into alternative solutions /cc +Vic Gundotra  Followerpower: Which non-Google services do you recommend for this, that work in Android, iOS and on the desktop?
Image
+1'd post by Dave O'KeeffeGoogle+ Has Killed Google Talk And Location Sharing OK, technically they haven't. Google Talk merged with Hangouts to be come, err, Google Hangouts. Google Latitude has now been hidden away in 'Locations' in the Google+ app. What I mean by the headline, these changes have killed them for me. And, by extension, my friends who I used them with. Messaging Whatsapp is now my go-to messaging app, even for Google contacts. I occasionally talk to one, possibly two, people on Google Hangouts. It used to be a hell of a lot more. I wrote a post about this when Hangouts first became Google's consolidated messaging service - https://plus.google.com/102482606627960634300/posts/7339y7xuQAg - and everything in that post remains valid. Location Sharing? Forget about it. Before: Open Google Maps and boom, there were your friends (if you had turned latitude on and had the layer showing. This setting was remembered across sessions). More than that, there was the web interface. Friends list on the left, big map on the right with your friends. You saw a blue dot showing the accuracy of the reported location, and you saw how long ago it was reported. Useful. Now: Well, provided a latitude user has shared their location with a Circle in the new g+ settings (hardly anyone), I can go direct to their profile, one by one, hover over 'Current Location' and see where they are. Or were. Who knows when. Or, I can open my g+ app, go to the 'Locations' tab and see hardly anyone (remember that g+ setting no one has turned on?). I have no idea when this location was reported; 1 minute? 1 hour? 1 day? Useless. Location sharing has gone from easy & useful, to complicated & useless. I spent enough time explaining Latitude to my less-than-techy friends - but they loved it. Now I have to explain this stripped down, less useful version in G+? I think I'll give that a miss... What do I say when they ask? "Google killed location sharing. Just forget about it."
Image
+1'd post by Bobbi Jo WoodsAlmost three months after the new G+ layout & new hangouts - a take on Google's ever-increasing direction toward trying to master "mobile social", from a mostly-desktop user. Has social become mobile-centric?  The new user interface for the desktop version of Google+ that launched mid-May had people either ranting or raving. Many have been saying it's more tablet-friendly than for desktop.  And the new Hangouts product dividing chat and video calls and combining them when called for have mobile users into them a lot more than before. It's been said many times (by Google itself) that the intent of Google+ is to be "a social layer atop of" all Google products (or the glue to bring them together under one umbrella).  Seth Sternberg was saying in the I/O fireside chat about the new Google+ desktop user interface that it's meant to be "completely seamless between mobile and desktop".  As an example, he mentions how, if you're at a Forbes.com article, it will show comments and sharing options to and from G+, and invites users to get the iOs and Android mobile apps.  All this leads me to believe that they truly want desktop to behave more like mobile.  Trying to force a design that works on one medium into another is sort of a fail.  Like asking someone to play an .mp3 on a Victrola. Meanwhile, Google is trying hard to weave Hangouts into Gmail and Google+ seamlessly, which I understand, but I've observed many users in my nearby stream sharing public check-ins and whatnot and probably don't realize what it's all really about. Google says they designed circles to really reflect your real interactions with people in your life, and integrate hangouts to work with circles, but I can't tell you how many times I've checked the nearby stream or posts from people who I've never interacted with before, and they kinda seem shocked at interaction. Not everyone who uses Google products wants to hang out and use the G+ stream, and frankly, I suppose the learning curve of the whole experience could be to blame, not to mention the fact that Facebook and Twitter are still synonymous with being social online. However, now that Hangouts have gone completely mobile, it changes everything.  There are people who would never hangout who now do it a lot.  Mind you, "Hangouts" was the former name of the product that Google created to allow up to 10 people in one video chat interface, but now Hangouts are the Google Talk chat and video chat rolled into one, although if you start or are invited to the video version, Google calls this a "Video call". The mobile content recommendations that Google started hollering about from the mountaintop since day one of I/O has made it clear that Google wants more distribution of mobile apps and drive up usage.  Add to that, Google's latest move toward making All Access Radio (http://goo.gl/NOaLDj) available in the already popular mobile Google Play Music, and you've got Your Entire Life™ sponsored by Google.  That's great, but please don't leave behind the desktop segment of your users. We're still here, and we're different.  We do use mobile, just in different ways, and perhaps not as much as others.
Image
+1'd post by James LottI hate the "New Improvements" that Google has been rolling out. First with Hangouts, then with Reader, and now with Google Latitude. Let me start by saying that, a long time ago, I started using Google's products: back when they lived by their slogan, "Don't be evil." I would also be the first to admit that they have come a long way as a company. When I got my first Gmail Beta invite, of which I had to beg and beg a friend for, I never thought that Google would evolve into some gigantic corporate that stopped caring about it's customers. And, to the average person, this may seem like an over-reaction. It might be, but lately it just seems like Google has decided to steamroll it's supporting developer environment and it's consistently growing herd of clients. Why would I say that? Well, since my complaint is about the loss of Latitude, we will start there.  Latitude is not just a location sharing service. It has an entire framework and api that lets developers do some cool things, like create applications that can cost-lessly locate a stolen phone or laptop. Yes: Free. How? Because Android phones, by default, feed passive GPS data to Google. That passive bit is important, but we will come back to that later.  One of the bigger issues it that there are developers out there that have literally spent thousands of hours working on products and now the API is being discarded. For you non-developers out there, imagine spending 3 years building a house out of brick, then having the city come by and say that brick is no longer allowed to be used and you will have to start again with wood. That's kind of a big stiff to developers and makes people like me not want to work with Google anymore. Something else to consider, is that the passive GPS in your device is still pumping all that location information to Google, but we now have restricted access to it. As of today's date, there is no API on how to access the Google+ Location Sharing to obtain the same information that was readily available in Latitude. All this location information on us is being cataloged and used to garner profits for Google via consumer profiling, but we can't make use of it. That might not be evil, but it sure doesn't seem right to me. Most of all, though, my complaint is personal. I am disabled because of a mental illness. Sometimes I end up places that I don't belong or that I can't describe to people. Latitude had badges, which displayed location on my website. It also let me see, in the Maps application, how far away someone was from me and they could see if I was wandering around, lost, or staying in one place. Finally, we had my online calendar synced up so that they could view where I was supposed to be and compare it to where I was. None of this is possible any longer. Yes, there are other programs out there, but they all use Active GPS. That is where GPS is constantly running and it is a battery killer. Yes, I can share my location individually through the Maps application, but without latitude I will have to log into G+ and check each friend individually to see who is closest before sending them my location. Not to mention that the G+ application in itself is a pain that is constantly using unnecessary system resources and draining my phone. That's a post for another time. In my experience, making an excellent Beta product and then pulling support in favor of another excellent product is normal. But looking at all the features that are being culled, the lack of support for IOS devices, the difficult manner in which the desktop websites are setup for navigation, and the lack of an attempt at transitioning: I cannot say this is another excellent product. I cannot even say it is an equal product. It is an inferior product with an undocumented API and just another reason I am looking to move away from Google's product line altogether. 
Image
+1'd post by Jaco Roux in MotoGP
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingI'm not just a fan of bike racing, it's kinda a job (not really "paid") but it has its perks. During #MotoGP , #WSB and #BSB you can normally find me behind the keyboard on the @MotoRaceFeed Twitter typing away doing lap by lap comms for the races. It keeps me very busy! I'm sorry for been so late replying to notes & questions I have been asked on here. If you are not in the UK, but love bike racing, I really can not stress how much you need to watch #BSB . It really is the best domestic championship going. So much talent from every corner of the globe. Just Google VIP Box or My Premium dot TV for live links. It really is worth it.
Image
+1'd post by Ken Ziebarth in Google+ UpdatesOpt out of automatic birthday postings.
Image
+1'd post by Wiggysan Wiggysan in Motorcycle RoadracingI need to sit down after this WSS race. It was absolutely bonkers.
Image
+1'd post by Robert Kennedy in Google Play Music All AccessPardon the bad attitude I'm about to spew, folks. So WTF? I've spent only a short amount of time with the all access trial, and already it seems infested with user hate. 1. Where is the "send feedback" or "report a problem" link? There appears to be no way to report a problem. 2. Suppose I find a song I like and I'm willing to pay to get a downloadable version of it. There's apparently no way to do that through the web UI. It seems I can do it via the Play app on my phone, but not on a computer in a browser?!? Come on, Play people. You're making me worry. I know this is just an early version of all access, but seriously? Play is not new. Web is not new. "Send feedback" is not a new idea. "Download" is not new. Anybody know what I'm missing, how to work around these issues, or how to lobotomize myself so I don't care?
Image
+1'd post by Kizzume Fowler in Google+ UpdatesI'm trying to figure out something about the 3-column design: How is having to scroll down, then up, then down, then up, then down again to read a cluster of posts more efficient than just scrolling down, and down, and down to read posts like how every other website works?  People are talking about how great this 3 column thing is--and I'm having a hard time.  I NEVER have to scroll back up on websites to continue reading something.  Pictures, sure, but with pictures I'm TRYING to skip by a lot of things--but information?  I'm not trying to skip any information. When there are 3 columns, it seems like I've just pasted a bunch of smartphones that are displaying news sites to my computer monitor.  It's like having 6 open books laid out, 2 rows of 3, on a table in front of you, and you're supposed to be able to focus on the one book on the top left.  I have a VERY hard time concentrating on something like that.  Generally, the MAIN thing I want on the screen is the particular thing I'm reading, it's how I'm able to concentrate on what I'm reading.  It's why I always run my browser in a maximized window, with nothing from other programs showing on the edges in any way.  When everything I'm trying to read is in a bunch of columns that are unrelated to each other, that concept is totally out the window. Clutter and things that get in the way of what I'm reading is the main reason I use AdBlock--when Google makes clutter the main feature of their new interface, when they make the information you actually want to see actually PART of the clutter, it's just kind-of hard to deal with.  It makes me feel dyslexic and like I just don't know how to read.  To me it's almost like they're trying some social experiment to see if they can change the way people process information. I don't know, if the columns lined up all the time it would be easier to track for me.  I could jump from one post on the left to another one on the right without having to scroll the whole page up. When reading communities posts in the 3 column mode, it's impossible to read the posts chronologically because NONE of the columns line up except at the very top of the page.  How are you supposed to do that, or is missing a bunch of posts considered ok to some people?  How can you keep track of the information that's in these 3 columns when there are no breaks? I wouldn't complain about ANY of this if the single-column mode was substantially wider than it is, right now it looks like it's made for surfing with a mobile device (I believe that it IS designed for that) instead of having a single-column mode that's designed for desktops. I don't get the obsession with having everything in skinny columns, it makes it hard to read in general when it's THAT skinny. There was a user script / user style for Chrome that I was using before called "Wider posts on Google+", which still works fine in Firefox with Greasemonkey, but Google disabled it in their latest update to Chrome--probably to absolutely ensure people use Google+ the way THEY want people to use it.
Image
+1'd post by Alex Reusch in Google+ UpdatesConsistent Google Locations feature on all platforms Google started to merge Latitude features with G+ on the mobile platform (Android only), through the integration of "Locations" in the actual G+ mobile client. Currently, this includes a own limited version of Maps, fix integrated in the G+ client. The way Google launched this new service is a kind of weak, as it only shows people on the map, which have granted visibility to you, by changing the G+ profile settings (Something what a normal user will not do and find out by himself). The old Latitude settings have not been considered at all. This normally means, that your map will be empty. Unlike in Latitude, you cannot send an invitation for people to add visibility of their current location. It just creates a G+ post, which will direct users to the G+ profile settings (not even to the specific location sharing settings). But only if they read, understand the post, click on the link and then search and change the settings correctly. Ishhhh..... WTF? Also, as already stated, the map is somehow an useless function. It only shows the profile pictures and location of your enabled contacts on a very basic map. It is not the powerful Google Maps app. You cannot change visibility of Layers (Traffic, Satellite, Terrain, Transit Lines, Bicycling etc.) or use features such as Search, Local, Navigation, Check-in, Location History etc. Also, there is no visibility of stale contacts. On top of that, you cannot ping somebody of your visible contacts to check-in. So there is no function at all in "Locations". Why did Google try to integrate such a basic useless map? Does not make sense at all. Google, what should you change: A.) "Locations" is not really a good name, if you have "Local" already as a service. BTW, why has "Local" been removed from the G+ Android client? So please, find another name such as: "People Locator". B.) Have a consistent user experience of G+ across all available platforms (Android, iOS, Desktop). So please make "People Locator" available on all of them with the same set of features. C.) Don't use an internal stripped down version of maps, which is totally useless. Please use the same approach as you did with Hangouts or Local, which are external apps that are not limiting the user experience. So "People Locator" should be a Google Maps feature, which should replace Latitude. Please include it within the G+ client and simply launch the full Google Maps experience (similar to your approach with Hangouts and Local). D.) Simplify the location sharing. The current approach is a no go. Also enrich the feature set with many additional functions such as: - Check-in yourself - Ping friends for check-in - Invitation to spontaneous events for people close to you (specific contacts, circles or even public). For example: Let's have a beer in 30 minutes at location XYZ. Please Google, make "People Locator" awesome. And most important: Make it logical and consistent.
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenGood summary of problems with the new Google + interface  Especially for those of us who still use desktops and actually like to read. We may not be the future, but we are still probably 50% of the users.
Image
+1'd post by Nik ButlerAt least we can trust that Google+ wont be bought out by some faceless corporation. Its not like Google have ever sunsetted any of their popular tools. We are so SAFE!
Image
+1'd post by Alex Reusch in Google+ UpdatesHangouts - Google's Hangover How Google failed to deliver unified communication... yet » The promise & the expectations Over the years, Google's has released several real time communication platforms, which lead to a fragmented products portfolio, providing many overlapping functions and different user experience, depending of the OS in use (Talk, Voice, G+ Hangouts, G+ Messenger). Finally, back in June 2012, Google announced that they are working on unifying its various real-time messaging applications across all devices. This unification was a step, that has been demanded by Google's large user base for quite some time. The expectations followed by this announcement have been high... maybe too high: • Unified user experience, platform independent (desktop, Android, iOS) • Support for Chat, Video, Voice, SMS, MMS • Support for all kind of files (beyond photos) • Integration with Google's core services (G+, Gmail, Drive, Contacts) » How did Google fail? Google has failed on the following points: 1. Unification  |  2. Completness  |  3. Integration — 1. Unification Google's answer to unified communication is "Hangouts". Beside the general hiccups during the roll-out of Hangouts (issues with installation procedure through Playstore, support of tablet devices), this highly praised solution is far away of delivering a unified user experience. There is no automated process for Android devices, which replaces the default installed GTalk app. How should the normal (non Geek) user know (Android and iOS), that he has to manually install the new Hangouts application? Also, the G+ mobile clients have not been updated yet, which means that the old integrated Hangouts app and the separated G+ Messenger app are still installed on the mobile device and run in parallel with the new Hangouts app. Of course, totally independent. Is there a chance for creating chaos? Hmmm... Like always, Google's communication comes in pieces - or in other words: Fragmented, similar to all of their services. — 2. Completness Hangouts currently supports Chat and Video, that's it. Highly requested features such as Voice, SMS and MMS are missing. File support is limited to photos only. To be frank, Hangouts is nothing else than a stripped down version of GTalk: • Many people have been using Voice from GTalk. » Gone. • Definition who shows up in your chat list? » Gone. • The possibility to set availability status (Available, Busy, Invicible etc.)? » Gone. • View details of your Google contacts (address, email, phone number)? » Gone. • A clear visible online status of your contacts? » Need an overhaul. • Swipe between conversations? » Gone. Interesting strategy. Google replaces a product (GTalk) with a newer advanced version (Hangouts), which can do less. So users do get a downgrade instead of an upgrade. Why key services such as Voice have not made it into the initial release of Hangouts is inexcusable. Google does provide voice services (again as a separate platform) since years, but failed to roll them out globally. We all know since Skype, that voice support is key. There are enough use cases, where voice calls (including to standard phones) make sense. C'mon Google, it can't be so difficult! Or must there come small startups like "Viber" to prove that is possible to do? At least, provide the possibility to make regular phone calls (no data) to a contact. Right now, I have to leave Hangouts, search the same contact again and make the call outside of Hangouts. SMS and MMS support? Or even better: SMS as a failback option. Ever heard of iMessage (available since June 2011)? Dear Google, can you explain what all your Hangouts developers, working on the unification, really did over the last 12 months? GTalk Lite. That's all? Maybe you should Hang out with them? — 3. Integration Hangouts is somewhat integrated into G+ and Gmail on the desktop. However, on the mobile device, the integration is very limited. Yes, of course you can add G+ contacts or circles to a conversation, but you are not able to get further information of your contacts. Name and picture, that's it. It's not possible to access the G+ profile of a contact, nor to get detailed information from Google Contacts (address, email, phone etc.). The lookup of Google Contacts is by the way also missing on the desktop version of Hangouts. It is also not possible to expand a G+ Circle and select individual contacts for a Hangout session. Actually you only can add a circle as a whole. If you want individual contacts, you have to manually enter each individual contact or scroll down an endless list. Why have contacts organized in circle groupings, if it's not possible to use them? Google, please start to get logical about contact management. Talking about the mobile user experience: As already mentioned, there are currently two versions of Hangouts running in parallel. Where the previous Hangouts was perfectly integrated into the Android contact manager, the new version is not integrated at all. When starting a Hangout through Android contacts, it starts the old Hangouts and uses per default the video option. No possibility to chat. Have I talked about the integration of Google Drive already? Well, there is none.  » Conclusion The window of opportunity for Google is small. Maybe already gone? There are a bunch of alternatives and many of the are far ahead already. WhatsApp dominates the independent messaging market. Skype is leading in voice and video. New challangers such as Viber are getting stronger. And not to forget about Facebook. Google, Google, Google... Why do you execute so poorly? Cheers, +Alex Reusch   ******************************************************** #hangouts #hangout #unifiedcommunication #voice #messenger #G + #googleplus #drive #phone #contacts #sms #mms
Image
+1'd post by Zedadias Wick in Google+ UpdatesDisappointed to find Hangouts will not download on my iPad 1 because is lacks a front facing camera, seems a pretty arbitrary reason to cut me out of text conversations. Also seems my iPhone4 is not compatible, though it does not provide a reason, just: ix.ApplicationNotCompatible.WarningTitle ix.ApplicationNotCompatible.SoftwareUpdateDescription My mother's Nexus 7 cannot install hangouts either, as the play store seems to think it is already installed. Tapping 'open' just opens the old google talk app. So seems hangouts just is not ready to work for us. My dad, however, is enjoying talking to himself on it...
Image
+1'd post by John HardyI think Google is trying too hard. Emphasising images over text is a bad move.
Image
+1'd post by Emily BroganAHHH!  This new layout, kill it with fire!  It's a visually cluttered, unusable mess.  It's at least somewhat legible and  usable in one column layout (on the top of your screen where it lists your circles, click More and scroll to the bottom to switch back to one column), but it's still not anywhere near as usable as the old. I really might have to rethink using G+ if this is how the interface is going to be.  ):
Image
+1'd post by Ramón González in Google+ UpdatesI'd like that you can search for information within each profile for specific posts. Just as communities have the search this community
Image
+1'd post by Markos Giannopoulos in Google+ UpdatesList of posts I have commented on This is so important that I don't understand how it's not a feature until now.  You reply to a post and unless someone else replies or +1's your comment, you can't find it again unless you search for it (if you remember the proper phrase to look for).
Image
+1'd post by Mark Dodsworth in Google+ UpdatesI would like to see the feature from Buzz where you could see public posts on a map. It was nice thinking that I could be at a football match and see all posts nearby to me and see which were actually coming from the ground. I would like to see Google working on the local relationships side of Google+ more. 
Image
+1'd post by David PrietoThis is brilliant, but it only shows how backwards post resharing is on G+. I mean, if I open the link and scroll down to the comments I can see Google's post as a comment and its whole conversation as replies, and that's fine. But I can also see lots of empty reshares as separate comments, and that's not. Let me explain why I don't like it. Google's post is popular, so let's say folks reshare it a hundred times and half of them they don't add anything of their own. If I visit the blog post I will see Google's comment not one time but one hundred times, and half of them it will be without any added content. Even worse, let's say I like Google's comment and want to see what people have to say about it. Instead of a single thread containing all the replies I will have to follow fifty different conversations. I'm sure Google sees how this can be a problem. So please, you guys. Do fix resharing. If I share someone's post and don't add anything of my own don't branch the conversation. Let my followers see the original post, with the original conversation, and add their comments to that original conversion instead of starting a new one. And please, show it only once as a blog comment, not a hundred times.
Image
+1'd post by Trey McDaniel in Google+ UpdatesIt would be nice to have the ability to edit all aspects of a post, including who is able to see it after it's been shared. Also, a convenient feature to have: being able to share with all circles but excluding single people instead of manually clicking everyone. Ex: +All Circles, -Jane Doe
Image
+1'd post by Nicole Spivey in Google+ Updates+Google+  I would like to see all the comments, replies to comments, and +1 to comments in on the post tab of my profile page.  Keep a history of all the stuff I do.  Also, when I receive a notification that someone +1 a reply I made. It would be nice to know which reply I made. I do make multiple comments to a single post. :D
Image
+1'd post by BR C in Google+ UpdatesOne more feature request, the ability to add photo to your post after it has been posted... https://plus.google.com/118101676549787356381/posts/MVt2NEKrhEh
Image
+1'd post by B Dows in Google+ UpdatesHow about the ability to see all of the G+ posts that we've +1ed? Like the one suggested here: 
Image
+1'd post by Nolan Taylor in MotoGPCRUTCHLOW!!
Image
+1'd post by Scott McLachlan in Our latest podcast is mix of UK house, garage and bass from the likes of Citizen, Disclosure, George Fitzgerald, Huxley, Joy O, Scuba and more: https://soundcloud.com/dfa1987/takeover-podcast-5-h-o-u-s-e
Image
+1'd post by Scott McLachlan in Drop Sam Smith, let's hear some more tracks like this please:
Image
+1'd post by John Elstone in Google+ UpdatesNow that there is more integration with Latitude on the cover section; I expect this will lead to the Nearby feed soon.
Image
+1'd post by Paul Gailey AlburquerqueThe BBC seem out of touch I recall ages ago they were among the first to offer a social buffet of sorts, but this selection looks so tired and incongruous to the sign of the times. What no Google Plus? On the flip side, why hasn't Google UK wined and dined them to get relevant? If I were on the Google Plus marketing team, i would profile a handful of sites that were ripe for the benefits. Or am I still in a ghost town?
Image
+1'd post by Eric Rice
Image
+1'd post by Jay Rosen
Image
+1'd post by Ian WheelerFlat out, knee down, elbow on the deck and he still manages to flick me the V's on the way past!
Image
+1'd post by Louis GrayThank you to +Mihai Parparita and All the Reader Peeps It would not be wrong to say that I would not be at Google if it had not been for Google Reader. It would not be wrong to say that +Mihai Parparita , along with Reader 1.0 kids like +Chris Wetherell and +Jason Shellen, and design mavens like +Jonathan Terleski and +Jenna Bilotta, were among the first people that helped me see Google's human face and reveal the great culture behind the innovation. I appreciate all they did and all the many people contributed to one of my all-time favorite products. With the news of Reader's eventual sunset, I have moved to +feedly, which you should definitely check out. This is my first share from Feedly, and it brings with me all the feeds and blogs I've followed for years, in a new place. Thanks to +Edwin Khodabakchian for his continued development of Feedly, and for all those who helped make Reader something fantastic and special.
Image
+1'd post by Stephen ShanklandGoogle ditched its RSS-handler extension for Chrome along with Google Reader. Here's the news and an alternative if you miss it.
Image
+1'd post by AJ Kohn #savegooglereader   Please reshare!
Image
+1'd post by John Hardy"Twitter is my main news source" Six words that I will never understand. Even after five years of trying.
Image
+1'd post by Les OrchardJerks.
Image
Image
+1'd post by Louis GrayGoogle Reader: Platinum Badge. Earned fair and square
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Morffew
Image
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Morffew
Image
+1'd post by Mariano Javier de Leon Dominguez Romero
Image
+1'd post by Richi JenningsWhy shouldn't the NHS be privatized? ~ THIS!
Image
+1'd post by Max Huijgen#Imagine social networks would be owned by the people that fuel it: would ´disruptive´ innovation like today´s new features be acceptable? Should a social network disrupt the user experience or should it just offer new options for those who want to use it?  Check this post for the description of the new roll-out of today. It destroyed most people´s carefully tuned profiles and the work put into their banners. Cover photos just got bigger like there is no choice and we are all happy with blurred text and superimposed profiles. https://plus.google.com/108713714482790711568/posts/JCvsy7x7iQs
Image
+1'd post by phil jonesHow bad energy decisions and Wall Street are intimately connected : 
Image
+1'd post by Matt CuttsI think Larry Lessig is going to be on The Daily Show tonight to talk about the corrupting influence of money in politics. But if you want a preview, Lessig gave a 45 minute talk at Google recently, and it's really good. Lessig makes a strong case that unless we can tackle the problem of money in politics, it will be much harder to fix the other problems facing our country. The talk is below, and it's definitely worth watching.
Image
+1'd post by Paul Christopher in Sci-FII hope BBC America is all over this... http://io9.com/5977844/will-utopia-be-your-new-obsession-signs-point-to-yes
Image
+1'd post by Mariusz Leś in Sci-FI
Image
+1'd post by Wing Kearns in Sci-FIUtopia is on 4od in Ireland and the UK for those who have access to it.
Image
+1'd post by DopeSoundDisclosure unveil video for their single "White Noise"
Image
+1'd post by Vitor DomingosI can relate with this
Image
+1'd post by Graham Wardrope in House Music
Image
+1'd post by Graham Wardrope in House Music
Image
+1'd post by Konstantinos Trz in
Image
+1'd post by Jennifer OuelletteA sound map of London's waterways: http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/index.php/survey/waterways/ …
Image
+1'd post by Graham Wardrope in House Music
Image
+1'd post by Graham Wardrope in House Music
Image
+1'd post by Renato Menchini in
Image
+1'd post by Obonic Pine Martencheck out, http://www.ussc.gov/
Image
+1'd post by Jonathan TerleskiWell, there went http://ussc.gov..
Image
+1'd post by Sisco VanillaGot these in the mail today. Thanks to +Julian Bond for the recommendation a few weeks back. #bitters   #liqueurs   #creolebitters   #orangebitters #oldtimearomaticbitters   #celerybitters  #jerrythomasbitters #pimentodram   #apricotliqueur  #violetliqueur
Image
+1'd post by Core News in Future Club Music
Image
+1'd post by Jon LebkowskyGlenn Fleishman clarifies Aaron Swarz' accomplishments.
Image
+1'd post by Le Mont Bennett in The Drum and Bass CommunityI will leave this one to you guys. Hmmmmmmm. What ya think? Do we dare research this and challenge, or just accept this? Is he pontificating or dropping knowledge? How do you weigh in? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaFTm2bcac
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic ExplorationsLast thing this morning will be a #djrum podcast published by #clashmusic  on 1st of November 2012. This mixtape is a tale - you decide what it is about. #clashmusic describes it as 50 minutes of smoky, noir-ish electronics - and seriously, this is a mix to enjoy.
Image
+1'd post by Alexander Farennikov in Electronic ExplorationsI will start by posting a remix by #djrum  who has been one of my most favorite bass music producers of the past couple years. This track is (almost) brand new - it was released last month, and I bought it last week. Enjoy!
Image
+1'd post by Ade Oshineye
Image
+1'd post by John HardyCharlie Stross:
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Morffew
Image
+1'd post by Robert Angle VlogsThe Tasty Adult Beverages Circle Okay, I am officially starting my "Tasty Adult Beverages" circle. If you want in, then comment or +1 this post and I will automatically put you in the circle. You WILL get emails or push notifications when I post something related to adult beverages.  What can you expect? Humorous posts related to tasty adult beverages, pics of adult beverages I am trying for the first time, or any other related subject I feel like discussing. An occasional Hangout exclusive to that circle. Posts will be sporadic and irregular unlike my daily Coffee Lovers circle posts. What do I want from you? Quality discussion, of course. Comment or +1 this post to join the circle I am pushing notifications to a select group just this once. You will not be bothered again unless you +1 or comment on this post. #beer   #wine   #adultbeverage   #champagne   #alcohol   #shots  
Image
+1'd post by KossoDear Google,
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewIt's true...
Image
+1'd post by Linus TorvaldsSo with even a $399 tablet doing 2560x1600 pixel displays, can we please just make that the new standard laptop resolution? Even at 11"? Please. Stop with the "retina" crap, just call it "reasonable resolution". The fact that laptops stagnated ten years ago (and even regressed, in many cases) at around half that in both directions is just sad. I still don't want big luggable laptops, but that 1366x768 is so last century. Christ, soon even the cellphones will start laughing at the ridiculously bad laptop displays. And the next technology journalist that asks you whether you want fonts that small, I'll just hunt down and give an atomic wedgie. I want pixels for high-quality fonts, and yes, I want my fonts small, but "high resolution" really doesn't equate "small fonts" like some less-than-gifted tech pundits seem to constantly think. In fact, if you have bad vision, sharp good high-quality fonts will help. #noexcuses
Image
+1'd post by Michael MahemoffA simple oAuth Twitter-to-RSS script from +Russell Beattie.
Image
+1'd post by Robert LlewellynFast Charging I have just attended a small opening ceremony of one of the first of over 60 fast chargers that are being installed in motorway services (highway rest stops) around the UK this year.  A fast charger puts 440 volts at about 70 amps into the battery, meaning that it can charge a completely empty battery in under 30 minutes. However in my experience, I plan to have 20-30% when I reach the fast charger meaning it takes about 10-15 minutes to re-fill. As the battery fills, the amount of juice being pumped in drops down to about 250 volts at 20 amps. I've had many questions about this system damaging the battery, Nissan, Renault, Mitsubishi and Peugeot all say this is not the case (all their cars can use a fast charger) particularly in mild climates like the UK. If you drive a Leaf in Arizona in the summer the battery is already so hot that fast charging can damage it over time. We don't really have that problem here.  Also, if you only ever charged your car using a fast charger there may be some long term problems, but I use it once, maybe twice a week max so it really isn't an issue. I have travelled well over 20,000 miles in the Leaf and if anything I've experienced the range increase, this is, to be honest, mainly due to me being better at driving it. There is no charge to use this system, Ecotricity aren't charging a penny. I have just driven to London, up to South Mimms (where the picture was taken) then back home (186 miles) for a total cost of around £1.20. That's what it cost me to charge the car at home for the first leg of the journey. Does the electricity all come from coal? Another common question, in the UK about 27% of our daytime electricity comes from coal, at night that drops to about 15%. I charge at night. Also, the company supplying the power to the fast chargers, Ecotricity, are one of the countries leading zero carbon electricity generators, Dale Vince (the the man I am posing for the press with) is the boss of Ecotricity and currently the electric car land speed record holder.
Image
+1'd post by Jon LebkowskyI love this, from +Charlie Stross in an ongoing discussion on The WELL: "We live in a world with face transplants, mass intercontinental travel, 200 channels of TV (which we mostly ignore), and where AI bots have run day traders out of the stock markets. It's like an 80's cyberpunk yarn! Yet the stars are as far away as ever, and our radio telescopes reveal nothing but a vast silence, unpolluted by alien transmissions. And so, over time, the state of mainstream literature converges with SF, which SF's original expansionary agenda crumble on the shore of broken dreams."
Image
+1'd post by Steve DaleI shouldn't have been surprised that Feedburner would be on Google's death list as it continues to prune its services to focus on Google+, but I am surprised by the apparent demise of RSS, as this article states: RSS, as a mainstream consumer technology, is mostly dead today... So guess I'm now one of the dinosaurs, because I still rely heavily on RSS as a pipe for receiving new knowledge and information from the people I follow. I'll continue to use it until the last RSS feed disappears! #rss  
Image
+1'd post by Courtney Engle RobertsonDear #Google - please update and do something useful with Feedburner and restore Google Reader features.
Image
+1'd post by Electronic Musichttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UrM0GHCKeE&feature=g-u-u
Image
+1'd post by Joe LancasterControversy alert: This post will make people mad. Mostly because of the day I've chosen to post it. Good. That's the idea. So today is the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the WTC Twin Towers (or 11/9 for those of us in the rest of the world). I can't help but notice most people commemorating the loss of a relative few who died that day, and completely ignoring the people who have died since, as a result of the US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. I read somewhere that there were about half a dozen people that didn't move from the top floor of building two, as everyone was evacuating. It didn't matter, because despite the mass evacuation, nearly 3,000 people died. Sure, it was an absolutely awful event and a great tragedy, but it seems we are completely neglecting the far more significant and important loss in connection with this story. How much more important? Oh, about 500x more important. Remember those buildings burning and collapsing, seeing it on the news? Think of all the people that were killed in the fire and rubble. Think about the list of names of every one of that nearly 3,000, how long that list is. How diverse the names. How many friends and families and life accomplishments were connected to these people. Keep that image in your mind. Now imagine another event of that scale occurring once every 8 days. A little over a week. Every single 8-day period. For the last 11 years. If you can wrangle these figures in you head, and grasp the enormity of how terrible that would be, congratulations. You now have an idea of the suffering that Iraqi (and Afghan) families have been living with since the U.S. (and its faithful lapdogs like us in Australia) invaded their country under the guise of a fraudulent "war on terror", a dishonest war that was in hindsight an obvious colossal WASTE of lives, fighting a non-existent threat, murdering almost entirely civilians. Unfortunately no one actually knows how many have died as a result of this invasion, because a large majority of the killings are never reported. The estimates I align with, using estimation methods that make the most sense to me, are towards the higher end of the scale: at least 1,500,000 people. This article, published in British medical journal 'The Lancet' in 2006, estimates up to 942,636, a vast majority of whom were civillians, and that only covers less than 4 years from 2003: http://brusselstribunal.org/pdf/lancet111006.pdf 9/11, whilst terrible compared to every day life, is but a 1/500th flash in the pan compared to the unimaginable suffering inflicted upon the middle east, somehow rationalised by many by invoking the '9/11 attacks'. So when I see people post nothing but remembrance for the WTC victims, to me it seems like the equivalent of only paying respect and remembrance to the 6 people on the top floor of that one building, and forgetting the other 2,994 that perished underneath them. The other 499/500ths.
Image
+1'd post by Phil Wolff 43 Million Concurrent +Skype Users on Monday, 10 September 2012 43.2 million concurrent users is a new record high watermark. More people connected at the same time than ever. This suggests the number of active Skype users is roughly 260 million. It's also a good time to note accelerating virality. The time for the number of users with dialtone to double kept slowing every year. But in 2009, the time to double stayed in the same neighborhood, adjusting for seasonal variances. Doubling and redoubling at scale without slowing much is a huge achievement. #skype #statistics #chart #microsoft  
Image
+1'd post by KossoTurning off the auto-renew on a few 'plus'-related domains I bought nearly a year ago. Without a useful API, there's really no point.  I also don't see a useful API coming this way any time soon. +Google+ and +Vic Gundotra had said that they were wary about releasing an API due to not wanting to annoy developers by making changes. (see Twitter). But I think they've done worse than that by offering so little. I was excited about this place a year ago. Looking forward to building stuff on and around it as a platform. Now I have very little motivation for it at all, since the API is so useless.  Meh+ 
Image
+1'd post by Al StrachanI want the Nexus Q... when are +Google going to bring Google Music to Europe.. I have a large pile of cash waiting for them 
Image
+1'd post by Neville HobsonWhat a great article about Winamp. I've been using it since v2 in 1998, still use it. But I agree with the broad conclusion +Ars Technica makes - AOL wasted Winamp. Interestingly, I got an email last week from Winamp asking me to take a survey to "help us to continue to make a better Winamp." My 0.02 contributed :) #g2t  
Image
+1'd post by Brian FitzpatrickVery much worth reading.  And a petition very much worth signing http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/24/richard-o-dwyer-my-petition Nicely written, +Jimmy Wales.
Image
+1'd post by Nick Tadd:)
Image
+1'd post by Vago Damitio
Image
+1'd post by Climate NewsMax Planck Institute: Arctic sea ice decline "shows a strong, physically plausible correlation with the increasing greenhouse gas concentration." "In the end, only the increase in greenhouse gas concentration showed a physically plausible link with the observed sea-ice retreat. We expect a decreasing sea-ice cover for increasing greenhouse gas concentration, which is exactly what is observed." h/t Joe Romm at http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/05/05/477817/study-virtually-certainly-impact-of-manmade-climate-change-is-observable-in-arctic-sea-ice-already-today/
Image
+1'd post by U-Ming LeeI decided to check out the Google+ SUL on a whim and yep, it's still pretty useless for me. I checked out Sports and Politics and the list I'm getting is still very... umm... US-centric. On Politics, I have people like Bob Casey, Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom. I know who these people are but they're not really significant outside the United States. It doesn't seem to make sense that people like Nicolas Sarkozy or David Cameron aren't on the list. On Sports, I'm getting NASCAR, the Indianapolis Colts and the Seattle Seahawks. Personally, I don't know a single person who watches NASCAR. Until I clicked through to their profiles, I didn't even know what game the Indianapolis Colts and the Seattle Seahawks play. I would expect a team like Manchester United to be on the SUL but it's not there - Real Madrid, Chelsea and FC Barcelona are, though. As Google+ gets larger and larger, the centre of the Google+ world is going to shift further away from the United States. The SUL, if they're going to keep it, should really start reflecting that.
Image
+1'd post by Kirsty LawerI wish there was a way to block/report people from the roll over... #GPlusProblems #GoAwayAddmeFortits.
Image
+1'd post by Kevin FoxI love today's XKCD.
Image
+1'd post by MystiCMaN Shishkaman
Image
+1'd post by Jeffrey J DavisVery nice stuff out of Bristol
Image
+1'd post by Guy Kawasaki(Mon10) An indispensable Google+ Chrome extensions just got even better: Replies and More http://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/fgmhgfecnmeljhchgcjlfldjiepcfpea The previous version enabled you to +mention a reply by clicking on a link. Now you can also +mention a reply to author of the post. Replies and More significantly increases the probability of a response to comments and posts because people receive a Gmail notification with +mentions. Everyone should install this extension because it makes Google+ much more interactive. If you want to help Google+ succeed, tell people to install it! Thank you +Matt Mastracci!
Image
+1'd post by The G+ Resource
Image
+1'd post by Ade OshineyeSometimes words fail me: http://www.hackerne.ws/item?id=3854776 From +Charlie Kindel : "I have no desire to "engage" on G+, but the narcissist in me likes knowing as many people are seeing my posts as possible)." It's like Unlink Your Feeds never happened: http://unlinkyourfeeds.tumblr.com/post/387644253/a-manifesto
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenMy request for European community managers is heard! It took a few months, but I have been hammering Google about the need for European community managers. Not only because they would be active during our working hours, but also because of the much needed broadening of horizons. Our Safe for Work differs completely from the NSFW policies in the US. Where some of us stare out of office windows with naked statues in view, we are often not allowed to even use G+ during work hours. Where California is a happy state where ´awesome´ is the first word, we Europeans take our time to respond, but can be critical and not afraid to call a spade a spade. Very unfortunate that the job is apparently temporary as I still feel Google needs to expand its very small team of community managers with some people from other regions to get a 24/7 culturally diverse presence. However in view of the current discussion under this post this a surprising move by Google. Make sure you have a look this topic. If such a thing as ambassadors for G+ materializes, let´s make sure Europe is well represented https://plus.google.com/u/0/112352920206354603958/posts/Gq1RkdtUSYj
Image
+1'd post by Sascha SchmunkBOMBER 80km/h :)
Image
+1'd post by Jesse Newhart
Image
+1'd post by mary ZemanI am noticing many comments about the readability of the comment area- I am using this new extension to improve the contrast- instead of grey on grey, the text shows up as black. hope this helps!
Image
+1'd post by Nick AllainHaha. It's a french film from a cat's perspective. Very funny. I especially like the "Whipped cream in the bathroom is not whipped cream." bit. #earlycaturday
Image
+1'd post by Michael MahemoffOn the one hand, developers can never expect a guarantee service continues when relying on scraping. e.g. if you're building an e-commerce catalogue by scraping amazon, expect your API to be an erratic moving target. But on the other hand, I do feel +Mohamed Mansour's pain. There's only a very limited API on Google Plus for now, which is fair enough for an early service, but if someone's taken the time to build up useful tools in the absence of a fleshed-out API, and users are loving those tools...there are better ways for said users and developers to find out everything's suddenly b0rken. Does Google benefit from a publicity bump by suddenly unveiling the new top-secret UI? Maybe a bit, but one of the best things about Plus is the more agile nature of releases, accepting feedback, and working with users as well as the developers who will eventually use their API. So couldn't G+ have launched a preview edition for Mohamed, his fellow developers, and their G+ extension fans?
Image
+1'd post by Gord WaitA good in depth interview with Sci Fi author Peter Watts He writes fairly dark Sci Fi, and his Rifters trilogy shows his background in Biology.. Well worth a read! His main site: http://www.rifters.com/
Image
+1'd post by John BlossomYep. Thanks, +Vladimir Kelman.
Image
+1'd post by Abraham WilliamsWant to know why +Google+ shouldn't have a write API for posting to the steam? Go check out FriendFeed. My home timeline has 50 updates in as many minutes that were all automatically fed in from Twitter and not a single one has a comment/like/share. My +Google+ stream however is the complete oposite. Everything is posted by the hand of a human and 90% of the posts have been +1'd/shared/commented on. Should there be a write API for circles? Yes! For the stream? No! cc +Google+ Developers
Image
+1'd post by Dirk Talamasca#Copyright #Bullshit #USofAssholes
Image
+1'd post by John KelldenWe Made It? What Happened? "The world is on track." -- +John Kellden
Image
+1'd post by G. G.Today's short review at my Bookshelf blog: Rip it Up and Start Again, a chronicle of postpunk music in the UK from 1977-1984.
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenStill a very valid point!
Image
+1'd post by Dave TaylorPacking for a long trip, it's amazing how many different cords and cables I need to carry with me. I'll say again, I'd pay extra for devices that all used a standard connector, not iPod vs. mini-usb vs. micro-usb vs. proprietary power vs. vs. vs.
Image
+1'd post by Sean Bonner* If anyone knows the original source of this please let me know!
Image
+1'd post by John Hardy
Image
+1'd post by EuroTechDeath To High Roaming Costs In The EU! European Commission proposes final stage in eradicating surprises on mobile phone bills for travellers If you have ever been stung by the sky-high charges that most mobile phone operators impose on people travelling across borders, it is finally time to celebrate. The EU has prepared itself for the final round in its fight against insanely high roaming charges and aims to open the market to real competition within the next couple of years. It aims to solve the problem in two major stages, initially by imposing tariffs that decrease incrementally as of July 2012 and eventually by reaching a stage, in 2014, where the roaming market will be open to competition by severing the ties that exist between your operator in your home network and the operator you choose when travelling. Neelie Kroes, European Commission Vice President for the Digital Agenda, said: “Consumers are fed up with being ripped off by high roaming charges. The new roaming deal gives us a long-term structural solution, with lower prices, more choice and a new smart approach for data and Internet browsing. The benefits will be felt in time for the summer break — and by summer 2014, people can shop around for the best deal." The agreement is expected to be approved by the European Parliament in May and the European Council in June, paving the way for the new rules to enter into force at the beginning of July this year. As of July 2012 consumers will benefit from drastically reduced roaming rates along the lines of: • 29 cents per minute to make a call, • 8 cents per minute to receive a call, • 9 cents to send a text message • 70 cents per Megabyte to download data or browse the Internet whilst travelling abroad (charged per Kilobyte used). Finally, by July 2014, customers will be given the option to purchase a separate contract for roaming while keeping their number. It will also be possible to choose a separate network for data roaming before travelling or on the spot — giving users even further options and driving down prices in the process. And in case that completely opening up the market to competition was not enough, the European Union is making sure that the maximum rates keep going down so that by July 2014, customers outside their country will pay no more than 19 cents per minute to make a call, 5 cents per minute to receive a call, 6 cents to send a text message and 20 cents per Megabyte to download data or browse the Internet (charged per Kilobyte used). Along the years, the European Union has been instrumental in making mobile telephony more accessible to consumers in the EU. The two major coups it landed came when it originally imposed number portability between local networks. This allowed people to switch seamlessly from network to network without needing to change their numbers, removing the major barrier in carrier-switches. The second benefit was the original part of the movement we're seeing today. The European Union first made network operators inform their customers of the rates they were going to be charged when travelling and eventually started imposing ever-decreasing maximum rates. Author: +Richard Muscat Azzopardi >Want to receive more #EuroTech news? Subscribe to this page!< Show your support by plussing the page and sharing it with friends.
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenOne step closer to one Europe: borders shouldn´t stop phone calls! Without +Neelie Kroes we would still be paying fortunes. If the telco providers had their way the cash cow would be even fatter by now If the +European Commission keeps on a roll we could actually make phone calls from Amsterdam to London for the same price as from Madrid to Barcelona. That we pay more for a shorter distance is just silly.
Image
+1'd post by Greg Santoswhat happened to google+ saved searches?
Image
+1'd post by Shawn DrapeDid I miss an announcement about the saved search list moving? I can't find it anywhere. +Google+
Image
+1'd post by Ade Oshineyehttps://developers.google.com/+/ for all those people who keep repeating that there's no Google+ API. Yes, it has limitations: - public data only - read-only - there are more things we should add
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewHate it when you +1 a post/comment before reading and then realise that you don't agree. Also no one else has +1'd the post/comment so it'll be really obvious if you remove it... #gplusproblems
Image
+1'd post by Dirk TalamascaFree Your Mind And Your Ass Will Follow - Funkadelic
Image
+1'd post by Jon LebkowskyI just posted this in the SXSW discussion on the WELL. Thought it bore repeating here: At the genesis of digital culture, a bunch of us self-referred as "neophiliacs" - and that's the same thinking you have with people who're into fashion and style and staying on top of (or in front of) trends. When you're young, everything is new, but as you grow older, you become less focused on the new and more focused on what you're used to, what you're comfortable with. You reach a point where you realize there's really nothing all that new. I think that's only part of the puzzle with apps, though. The fact that so many new apps are appearing is attributable more to production energy than potential consumption - i.e. there may be dozens or even hundreds of Facebook imitations appearing, because budding young entrepreneurs often begin by trying to build new versions of already-successful platforms. This can work: Facebook was just another in a series of social networking platforms, several of which had at least some success (if adoption=success, not sure they were profitable)... Ryze, Friendster, Orkut, Myspace. Facebook nailed the right combination of interface, features, and timing to get mainstream adoption, so it "won." Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon are all successful product companies, but Google and Facebook have a different model, and they've succeeded because they're clear that their users are not their customers. Sterling said that the users are the products - the word he used was "livestock." Actually, the product is the users' attention, and in this case they're very much like mass media platforms - print periodicals, television and radio all attributed their profitability to the selling of attention. To be viable in this market, you have to have signficant attention to sell. In the mass media world, the means of production and distribution were significant, so you inherently had just a few channels on which most people were focused. Now the means of production are inexpensive and abundant, and you have many players, but only a few get sufficient volumes of attention to be profitable in a big way. Others (e.g. The New York Times) have to charge users directly to make a profit, because they don't have enough adoption and the right model to be profitable through ad sales alone. You also have nonprofits like Wikipedia depending on fundraising efforts. This is the world we're in today and the context for SXSW, which has succeeded because it's done a good job of staying forward enough without being too far ahead of the curve. SXSW shows you the present and near-future of media, and right now it's divided in the same way that the Internet context is divided. So much more of it than before is about marketing and celebrity, but you still have programming about democratization and about smaller, more intimate or personal uses of Internet.
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenGoogle please read my profile location! No Google Music in Europe! Yet another email trying to convince me that I spend $3.99 on a service I don´t have as I live in Europe. This time Google clearly realizes not everyone lives in the US so they do some explaining. Did you know, rest of the world, that spring break is an American tradition? And that they celebrate this in Catskills? Guess not :) For most of my life I thought spring breaks were quite common in schools and I must admit that I can´t pinpoint Catskills on a map. However the school of my daughter in Spain seems to have been Americanized as she will be off as well next week! Remember the launch of Google Music ´Rock the world´ it said. Small world indeed as it seems confined to the US: Like baseball or democracy, spring break is an American tradition, and whether you celebrate it in Daytona Beach or in the Catskills, you need the right tunes. This week only, you'll be able to buy your favorite party music (however you define that) for only $3.99 an album. Now, three things you should not do after reading this: a) tell me it just something temporary and you know the music industry doesn´t want to give out licenses to Google for Europe because they didn´t like SOPA / in Europe you can´t have music licenses so Spotify never existed / it´s all the fault of the local music right protectors (it´s not, they have no say over it if you have a deal with the record company) / the music industry asks too much money and Google can´t afford Europan rights / music companies don´t like to earn money b) tell me it´s called Google Play now as I will stick to call it Market and Music as I have the first and miss out on all the extras of ´Play´(no books, movies, music) c) tell me that if I use a VPN service I can illegally use Google Music Play. If I want to violate the terms and conditions of Google I could as well get it from Pirate Bay oh and d) report this as spam although it would be hilarious Take a tip from this amateur marketeer and read your own Google patent on context sensitive targeted ads. This is neither targeted, nor sensitive :)
Image
+1'd post by Abraham WilliamsSometimes I love the internet.
Image
+1'd post by Blake Ethridge
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Morffew
Image
+1'd post by Jeffrey J DavisHe owes his $1B empire to our laws and the alcohol lobby
Image
+1'd post by Colin Lucas-MuddWhilst You’re in the U.S. Mr. Cameron—Take a Stand Against Corrupt Lobbyists I was shocked this morning to see that the UK, in the person of Home Secretary, Theresa May, has ordered Richard O’Dwyer’s extradition. For those of you who thought that the SOPA battle was won, think again. This is madness. This is wrong. This is why the 99% movement, as it finds its feet and its voice, will not go quietly into any dark night—apologies to Dylan Thomas. For those of you who are unaware of the background here please read, in full, my post of last June, reproduced below. This was when there were few of us concerned to the max about S.978 that became SOPA. Read, think, then read the linked Guardian article. It’s too late in the U.S., but the Brits tagged on this post should lobby—loudly. Follow the Money—The Bill is in the Tail $85,748,057 plays $29,100. Given the money involved and the vested interest, maybe it’s not so surprising that there has been little connection made between two stories that will impact every consumer of online media. It is rare that I find myself needing to use the word ‘conspiracy’ in a post. Sadly, I can think of no other word that can explain the mainstream media’s silence. Specifically, the media’s failure to make the connection between the efforts of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department to extradite British student Richard O’Dwyer, and the bi-partisan support for the passage of S.978. For those of you, whether in the UK, US, or, indeed, around the globe, who are just about to skip the rest of this post on the basis that neither O’Dwyer, nor the US Congress and S.978 have anything to do with you, I encourage you to have a little patience. For those of you who are reading this online (that would be 100%), and who have ever shared copyrighted material online (that’s certainly greater than 70%), you should be concerned. Very. First of all, a little background. Richard O’Dwyer is a 23-year-old undergrad at Sheffield University. His ‘crime’ was (past tense since Mr. O’Dwyer took the site down last year as soon as he was contacted by the authorities), the publication of a website (‘TVShack’) that, although it did not host illegally-copied material, did provide links to sites that did. As such, there was little difference between O’Dwyer’s site, and most, if not all search engines. Any difference that does exist could be argued to be that users of the site should be expected to know that the downloads accessed through the links were illegally-copied. However, I don’t see Twitter’s management subject to extradition to the UK in the Super-Injunction case . Nor should they be. Links are simply links. It is the users who bear responsibility for their actions. Further, in the UK precedent would prevail and, under existing case law, Mr. O’Dwyer did not commit a crime. In a sensible world the removal of the site would have been the end of the matter. However, late last month, Richard O’Dwyer was arrested at the request of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department. He spent a night in prison, subsequently appearing in court this past week at the start of his fight against extradition. This is where S.978 comes in. S.978 is a bill the stated purpose of which is to, “amend the criminal penalty provision for criminal infringement of a copyright, and for other purposes.” In plain English, the bill will criminalize streaming of content through changing such activities’ legal status from a misdemeanor to a felony. Potentially this brackets those who share copyrighted material on YouTube, whether intentionally or not, with the criminal element that operates full-scale DVD reproduction and distribution operations. With massive fines and/or up to five years imprisonment, in the event that he is extradited and found guilty, the potential penalty will make Mr. O’Dwyer’s night in Wandsworth prison seem like a pleasant break from college. Now I’ve been watching the progress of S.978 for a while. However, it was not until last Friday when I followed up on a Tweet from and looked at the numbers on Maplight.org that the scale of the inequity hit home. As pointed out very succinctly in OpenCongress.org , S.978 is a very rare thing. It is a bill with bi-partisan support (should that be tri-partisan support since it has backing of the White House too?), in an age when even essential and obvious Acts languish through political point scoring. It was a couple of hours later that I read a summary of the O’Dwyer case in the Guardian . This was late on Friday evening. The connection between the two stories, the currency, and the importance of the issues involved led me to expect several thousand words of analysis and commentary over the week-end. Instead of which, forty-eight hours later, nothing. There have been a few pieces in technology blogs and the second-tier media. However, in the mainstream there’s been barely a word. We know that it’s all about the money. However this seems more. It’s hardly surprising that the word ‘conspiracy’ comes to mind. As any other author and publisher, I support copyright protection and the laws required to ensure that creativity is encouraged and rewarded in a tangible form. As a pragmatist, I acknowledge that personal sharing will continue and that it is the models that need to change to accommodate the fact. Further, I understand that in today’s cloud-based digital environment, truly creative thinking and real investment, rather than draconian acts and legal remedy, need to be applied to discourage wholesale copying and distribution. I say ‘discourage’ because stopping it altogether is no more possible today than it was in the days of VHS and cassettes. However, as a voter, a commentator, a concerned citizen, and a media consumer I’m saddened that even the thinking media are able to turn a blind eye to the obvious and allow vested interest prevail. I expect it of the politicians. I expect it of the majority of the media. But the entirety? Sad.
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenWhy are people upset about SOPA, but keep silent when a young man is extradited from the UK and put in a US jail for copyright infringement? Read the text below and wonder why we don´t see any public outcry!
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenSuggestions to enrich G+: a collection of small annoyances and large improvements based on an request by our community manager +Natalie Villalobos mid December to come up with suggestions My short write up at that time turned out to be a long one and ever since I have updated this post based on new experiences or other peoples suggestions in the comments. Here is my answer to her original questions followed by numerous updates based on your comments on this topic: - engagement is excellent here. There is more response on G+ than on any forum I have ever seen. Be aware that I said forum instead of social network. G+ is worlds largest forum in my view and a place where strangers discuss, get befriended, switch subjects and participate in other groups they feel comfortable with, etc. Most of the negatives compared to FB are irrelevant if you look at G+ from this POV. I won´t expand on it but it colors my view. As the world largest forum there are a few things which could be improved: - have different views on a ´thread´ Currently you can see all comments or the last. With thread like this one I would like to have options like: Show all comments from my circles, my Extended circles or this specific circle. I would also be able to set a quick read view by selecting show me all comments with x number of ´1´s. - the notification system is key to engagement as it´s thé way to have asynchronous discussions, I post at time x and reader y responds three days later. Thanks to the little red luring square I get drawn to it. However I have a limited number of people following me and even I wake up to 20+ notifications. If I go through all of them I have to go the show all screen. I would prefer a clear distinction between a +1 or a share notification, a mention and a comment. I would like to be able to see my ´active topics´ at a glance. I think most of the people with large followings have huge trouble following up on notifications only. It´s now a push system, make it a pull system as well by enabling me to view activity based on my criteria. It will stimulate writers to get back to a discussion. - an automatic trackback url in every reshare would help enormously to keep discussions concentrated. Now users have to do that themselves and it´s a tedious job so hardly done on resharing. Fragmentation is the result as the discussion just spawns and dies. -as G+ is asynchronous by nature (well except hangouts) make timed posts possible. You can make a brilliant observation but at 8.00 AM European time, the US sleeps, Europe won´t post until much later and only Asia is fully awake. Let me time them if I have five good ideas at 8.00AM but don´t want to flood the stream. You know my issue with the US centric character of G+ and the self reinforcement this introduces. I won´t expand yet again on it as https://plus.google.com/u/2/112352920206354603958/posts/Ta74ZzFWvdz summarizes it. more visible moderators on the forum on this social network. Not to moderate but to be helpful where possible and a listening ear in case of complaints. Be a bridge between users and management and actively go after the people who have issues like the large censorship discussion. I have discussed that as well as you´re aware and my thoughts can be found in this quick link https://plus.google.com/u/2/s/inurl%3A112352920206354603958%20AND%20censorshipMax Just show you and your colleagues are listening by acknowledging people´s positive feedback. And lastly: get a companion to yourself :) Just clone yourself and make sure we have 24/7 a moderator from Asia and from Europe. Suddenly it becomes a day job while f.i. Europeans like me can still interact with a moderator during normal hours. The huge extra advantage is support for more viewpoints than only the American which would enhance the way Google looks at G+ Just a few suggestions about posting and engagement. I have many more but I promised a short post :) Edit: Things I should have added are the little ones which can ruin your day: - if you share a post with a few friends or with yourself as a way of preserving your draft post why is it impossible for the originator of the post to share this to ´Public´. The maximum you can do is ´extended circles´ - Why is there no visible indication about the number of people that a post is shared with. It says limited and all too often I have found that people thought a private message was a shared post so they gave it a +1 which makes no sense. It only shows that there is confusion about private, very limited, a large but limited group and public. Let them have different colors if shared one to one, to less than 50 people and limited but high number. Show the number as well. Give the users control over the different colors for different numbers. *Give us a separate notification counter for private posts. People miss them all the time and the higher the follower count the larger the nightmare to keep track of them. - Make sure G+ saves a draft if you start typing in a comment box and switch to check someone´s profile or postid. I usually have two views on G+ open to circumvent it, but often enough I forget and I lost a long comment. - If you edit a post or comment and decide not to save changes it´s ridiculously easy to hit delete. Comments are gone forever when this happens. if there was an autodraft save like mentioned above you could go back to that. In the absence of it, move that delete button far away from cancel and save and maybe prompt people if the software notices more than ten characters were typed. - The equivalent of a url shortener but then certified by G+ to stay within G+ to provide a safe (not external) short link to posts. The current extremely long urls ruin the layout, while the http://bit.ly etc urls are unknown entities so less clicked on. -add the possibility to update a share if the author corrected something (ranging from a typo, the wrong link, to a better worded paragraph or even an important update.) Currently a share is a copy at the time of writing so independent of the main post. Now you don´t want to share a nice New Years´s message which the author afterward changes into a death threat, so it should never go automatically My proposal is a link between the share and the original and a mechanism comparable to a tag in a photo. The sharer gets a notification that changes are made, get to see the differences and can accept them or not. This way the sharer keeps full control and the author can communicate stupid typos as well as important updates to all shares without doing anything except changing his own post. Enable comments, disable sharing We have disable comments which can be nice We have limited circles which is fine We have lock down this post to avoid sharing outside of your own limited circle: a need as otherwise it could still spread over all of G+ BUT we can´t disable sharing and leave comments open and that´s exactly if you want to share something with a group of people and want to constrain to these people only. Privacy matters and this a huge oversight to me. Just add one option and we have what we want: the privacy we select ourselves while being able to engage with the group we trust. Here is someone who wants to go back to FB because of it: https://plus.google.com/105407459099546571124/posts/fmuTEu5hsTb Indexing posts, indexed by the user on the user's profile page. The ability to index posts in various categories ordered according to importance I ascribe, not indexed merely by date in one long stream, so that on a G+ profile page in the "Posts" tab, the Posts tab would have sub-headers. When the generic "Posts" tab is clicked you see all the posts for the user in one long chronological steam, and then when the sub-headers are clicked you get a more detailed picture of posts specified by the user. Hangout recordings it would be nice to have some sort of banner at the top of the screen or something similar that announces that the Hangout is being recorded for later use. A sort of release form. People are not always aware when it´s mentioned so if the person recording could enable a simple recording sign on the running image everyone has the chance to get out of the hangout, discuss it or accept it. Avoids later problems. #GplusForumMax #MOAF
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenAn answer: Why criticism of G+ is constructive instead of negative a response to a view more people have on G+. All hail to Google is not the answer! +Christina Trapolino You say "When folks like +Max Huijgen submit user feedback but feel that their own input hasn't directly affected company policy or feature implementation, it doesn't mean that customer feedback isn't taken into consideration by Google. We have got to learn to stop focusing on our own impact (the me, me, me of social 1.0) and focus instead on the combined impact of ourselves plus our networks (the us, us, us of social 2.0)." I fully agree and that´s exactly why I am active on G+. If I had a problem with my wishes not being fully implemented I would either use a different product or find a way around it. When a large group of people share this feeling with me and have problems with G+ being very US-centric I organize people. I make proposals how to change it, I try to do what Google doesn´t and make this place more inviting for Europeans, I talk with people at Google, I have produced many posts with crowds sourced suggestions to improve the product, and I keep doing this. I have opened a page +Europeans on G+ I show up when there is a "Google Europe hangout" (at again a completely unusable time 10 AM CET) I was as good as the only one on time and I did spend my time speaking with Google´s Stockholm representative. I´m there and offer +Ridwaan Carregosa all my help to get more people to the next hangout. I suggest a better time, offer to promote it through my own circles, broadcast it from +Europeans on G+, etc. In short: I use social 2.0 to get this place to what it can be. And yes some suggestions could have been implemented months ago as the users clearly want this. That this comment [this originated as a comment on another post] will be lost forever because the search doesn´t index it and I can´t even place a link to this specific comment is just an example of stuff missing and I have been suggesting this and other improvements since June 30 when I started on G+. Not having searchable comments and links to them makes G+ just hopeless for folks who like to do more than say hello every morning. Google loses valuable people by not solving this. However I´m still here as I work hard to get this place better suited for large groups of users. You state ´We have got to learn to stop focusing on our own impact (the me, me, me of social 1.0) _ but this _command is not followed by real people. My friends are not interested in this future, *they vote with their feet and just leave. Wrong? Maybe, but a reality you can´t change by emailing them afterwards that they didn´t get social 2.0 (the original, unrelated thread where this comment originated can be found here https://plus.google.com/u/0/102615863344410467759/posts/4rPsv11rDHA Just a sample of my numerous posts about how to dress up this place to what it could be. Apart from the G+ etiquette all written on a request by +Natalie Villalobos Suggestions to enrich G+: a collection of small annoyances and large improvements https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/Qbbe5b2aqTS G+ etiquette: what are the unwritten rules? https://plus.google.com/u/0/112352920206354603958/posts/cas5ZsVy9vr The importance of unique content and the protection of it for G+´s future https://plus.google.com/u/0/112352920206354603958/posts/cdAbDHjXdBY *One of my many European posts which has links to the rest:+ https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/QWKmxAyN723
Image
+1'd post by Ade Oshineye
Image
+1'd post by Matt HolmesYet it's still not clear he's done anything wrong under UK law... Nonetheless the extradition has been agreed. An attempt in 2010 to prosecute a similar site failed. European laws are meant to give protection to sites that don't create the material they link to. It really is about time the ridiculously one-sided US-UK extradition agreement Labour brought in was re-negotiated. (Standard of proof is far higher to extradite a US citizen to the UK).
Image
+1'd post by Mat BettinsonA blood curdling scream. Scene begins with Alison clutching a towel with a grinning Emeris sat on the toilet in the bathroom. Emeris: She killed me. Annie: Accidentally. Alison: He was watching me. I'm going to slap that grin off your face! Emeris: You said I was invisible! Annie: No, not to other supernaturals. Emeris: What's she then? Alison: Werewolf! Emeris: Explains the growler.
Image
+1'd post by Tony SidawayUpstairs Downstairs. My wife turned the television on and started watching an episode of The Professionals. And of course it all makes sense now. Mr Hudson is running River Song and Alex Drake as time-travelling secret agents through Number 165 Eaton Place, using CI5's historical records as a drop box. The target is the notorious time agent Jerry Cornelius, who in that era is masquerading as the Duke of Kent. Should Steven Moffat utter a word, Una Persson will smother him in writs!
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Broadfoot
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewO.O
Image
+1'd post by Daniel LemireI'm an introvert. That's why you don't see me at meetings and celebrations. If you do, I'm in a corner looking awkward. That's why I'm not trying to build a large laboratory of busy graduate students. That's why I crave time alone to reflect and think, to write and code... I am not "shy": I can talk in front of 200 people without thinking twice about it. I don't lack confidence. It is not hard to check that I have a large ego (too large some would say). But my social interactions have high transaction cost. I can't pretend to be your friend on the fly. My brain does not work that way. I love how it is progressively becoming "ok" to be an introvert. /cc +Venkatesh Rao, +Seb Paquet
Image
+1'd post by Joseph LeeA revised take on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, thanks Liberal Arts for allowing me to get this one! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs
Image
+1'd post by Robert ScobleGlassmap is far worse than Path ever was. Will Silicon Valley stop pushing app companies to be viral at the expense of users? I'm really livid at apps that auto post to my feed an endorsement of themselves without showing me what they are doing first and giving me the option of refusing it or changing it. I'm tired of this and will continue pointing out developers who are on the wrong side of this. Geesh. Oh, and Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's CEO/founder, agrees with me (he liked my post over on Facebook on this issue) and this is a breach of their contract.
Image
+1'd post by Tim Bray
Image
+1'd post by Peter du ToitIt's official - I have had it with "journalists" who keep writing about G+ as being a wasteland when they don't use the service or engage here. What's up with that?
Image
+1'd post by Feed me Google+RSSThe proposition: Google+ should provide us with feed URLs If you agree, you might like to add your voice by resharing this and +1 our Page: https://plus.google.com/b/105786194532858868645/105786194532858868645/about There are plenty of people animated about the lack of official G+ RSS feeds but no-one seemed to have created a single place for us all to be counted, so we've created Feed me Google+ -- here's hoping it helps Google sit up and take notice. All feedback welcome.
Image
+1'd post by Feed me Google+RSShttp://gplusrss.com is a new service we've just heard about via +Robert Heine, and is made by +PIXELMECHANICS | Webproduktion. As it says on its home page: "‘Google+ to RSS’ is NOT affiliated with or distributed by Google. This service is simply solving the issue that there is no official RSS-Feed to Google+-profiles" We haven't used the service yet but if you have, let us know what you think. Great though it is that people are filling this Google+ void, it would be better if they didn't have to! If you agree, please reshare our proposition: https://plus.google.com/b/105786194532858868645/105786194532858868645/posts/KXfVvVEWeXx
Image
+1'd post by Jonathan Schofield
Image
+1'd post by Don LaVangeFew realize that while Judge Bork had crap taste in constitutional law, he was insightful when it came to drinking.
Image
+1'd post by Xavier BrinonFrom the Oatmeal ^^!
Image
+1'd post by Tony SidawayGetting tough: Australia is going to withhold benefits from parents who won't vaccinate.
Image
+1'd post by Edd Wilder-JamesPolicemen chases himself This is hilarious, though any programmer might feel a shade of sympathy for the officer's predicament. It does sound a lot like debugging.
Image
+1'd post by Europeans on G+Not only Google Music, Google Currents but Chrome for Android: not available in Europe Geotards at work as +Julian Bond coined it ;)
Image
+1'd post by Adrian Scott'WSWS: Richard has never broken any law in this country? Julia: We have been led to understand that it’s not a crime in this country. To be extradited to America, the offence has to be a crime in both countries... When you go through the extradition courts, they want you to go to America to prove your innocence. They don’t want to be looking at the allegations against you.'
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenGoogle check my profile you wanted me to make: I´m European! So stop sending me emails about Google Music which I can´t use! Yes, I know Valentine's Day Music For Less is very tempting. Spending less on declaring your love sounds cheap to me, but that´s up to you. It´s unforgivable and plain stupid to mass email people outside the US with ´FOR LOVERS, FOR LE$$´. Not only does it look like spam, but as a quick reminder we don´t use $$$ and *Google Music is not available here. Why do keep sending me these emails to my G+ email account. If +CircleCount can read my location than certainly the geniuses at Googolplex must be capable of reading that location field. It´s annoying and insulting that you announced Google Music by saying Let´s Rock The World and forgot to say it was not really available in that rocking world. Only in the US and maybe Canada got lucky this time around. Oh and while we are on it. Your link to Google Music gives a 404 so maybe you were on something. Try https://market.android.com/music&utm_source=en-us-em&utm_medium=nf&utm_campaign=1213 and see what happens. I have explained to you dear Googlers Why it was a mistake to launch Google music only in the US but that was in December. You had some time to fix your email lists! https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/anBUCJAc8CV Oh, and I learned from the first comments that some of you just use a VPN or proxy, but a) without an American credit card you can´t buy a discounted love song ;) and b) downloading songs from some obscure site is exactly as illegal as using Google music from outside the US
Image
+1'd post by Kevin KellyWant to see what comics could be like in a post-paper world? One of the better experiments I've seen is this word-less one about the first word. Warning, it is NSFW. It's about hominid sex and the invention of language. http://www.electricsheepcomix.com/delta/firstword/
Image
+1'd post by KossoMost excellent. I want one. Y'know.. for the post-apoc'. The ability to provide power and charge without solar or kinetic energy is great. So many great use cases and situations where this could be a life-saver as much as a convenience.
Image
+1'd post by Rachel McCrawIf that slush freezes back up overnight, +Ingvar Mattsson is working from home tomorrow. (Whether he likes it or not. ;) ) He may be used to getting around in icy conditions, but we are both in a definite minority with that in Greater London. I particularly don't trust people trying to drive, from observation, even with roads no worse than that. It was unclear whether the trains were even running when he set off for Canary Wharf to buy something this afternoon. The sky looks like more snow is on the way. Those dark blobs aren't clouds, but a window in serious need of washing. :)
Image
+1'd post by Kelly KinkadeSeen on Tumblr. I'd be seriously tempted to have this one printed on little cards that I could give to people who are annoying me.
Image
+1'd post by Euro MaestroIs the US the land of the free ? for +Paul Drinnon and others.
Image
+1'd post by Alireza Yavari
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenBACKLINKS: shared posts on G+ now have a automatic link to the original! The number of times I have been asking for this simple feature is uncountable. You post something, it´s shared a lot and there is no way to get back to the original post. Bummer. Not a big deal for a funny gif, but if you wanted to start a discussion it got fragmented with every share and the only way to find the original discussion back is by going to the first poster´s stream and try to find it there. Tedious: especially if the share you found was already a few day old. What you could do for the important posts where you expected a large number of shares and hoped to get a discussion going, is providing an backlink in every post. To do so you first had to post it with locked enabled. Then find the link, edit the post, fill in the ´if you found this through a share click here.......´ link and unlock the post. A hopeless task and although a few people took the trouble, like yours truly, most never cared about it. Result: one or two comments on a share and no centralized discussion possible. Today I posted a few things which got shared a number of times. I happen to check on one and SURPRISE a backlink is automatically included by G+. See the picture as it explains it all. If you share this or another post you will see for yourself! Does it now work for everyone or is it being rolled out incrementally? Try it and report plz. Mega goodie from Google without any announcement: thanks Google coders!!! +Brandon Campeaux +A.V. Flox +Mike Elgan +Tom Anderson +Trey Ratcliff +Kol Tregaskes
Image
+1'd post by LD WilliamsIt is Only 6-30 PM, but So cold that All I want to do is go to bed & wrap several Duvets around me!
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenEurope calling: the old giant wakes up and calls on its peeps! now that Europe shows up as the largest continent on G+ self awareness goes up and initiatives to get together flourish. It all started this Monday with my request to post your country if you were European. I offered to circle the first 500 who would do so without any obligation to circle back. Result: we needed a part2 as we hit the 500 comments limit. The original post was shared 225 times. You can find it here: https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/CdhmHGbYjgi Part 2 is still open and can be found here: https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/NDAhG4fP2a7 If you didn´t do so already, post there and as long as I have spots free, I will circle you as I want to see my streams come alive during European hours. There was a shared feeling that it would be great to get some attention from G+ for Europe with official hangouts from the community managers during European times, feature roll-outs from Google no longer restricted to the US, having some central point to share European circles and last but not least the desire to have hangouts without having to burn the midnight oil. To help solve this and get Europeans together on the same page I created +Europeans on G+ It already has three managers out of the community but feel to offer a bit of your time as it must be a community project. Circle the page if you didn´t already do so. The first post can be found here: https://plus.google.com/100160648652252546872/posts/QXAJ1DFma68 The community of Europeans responded and we got the following new initiatives: An compilation of the who is who in the EU countries: The Euro 200 Circle by +Euro Maestro Who are the most followed in Europe ? Who have the highest Klout score ? This circle helps to answer those questions. This is sort of a Who's Who list of Europe. https://plus.google.com/107040353898400532534/posts/YPv8bzRwYXD Next the even more exclusive circle of the most followed Europeans from all over Europe as compiled by me thanks to assistance of +CircleCount the best profiler site there is and they happen to be European as well :) The Euro Top 50 Circle: Europeans with the largest follower count No pages, just people based in geographic Europe who were already famous or got their followers through relentless efforts on G+ https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/QUEP9UT9iVT An attempt to crowd source the most valuable Europeans on and for G+ by +Gabriel Vasile MAKING A "BEST OF EUROPEANS" GOOGLE+ CIRCLE You can still cast your votes there. https://plus.google.com/106393478695568433143/posts/62vZyfksGGk And as promised the most important circle: you, the people! The very first shared circle of 500 Europeans who got into action on my call out on Monday. The last thing we want is a small elite running this place so we need more peeps from all over Europe to participate and enjoy G+ I hope this post can do the rounds through Europe and gets us firmly on the G+ map. So even if you´re not European yourself, but sympathize with the initiatives to form a community here, help spread the word and share it. And don´t forget: we all love the other continents and most of us have circles which encompass the whole world. So it´s not against others, but pro us :) If you got this through a share this link will bring you back to the discussion:https://plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/PDUi13o9dB1
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenTime for action Europeans: get your streams flowing during your hours! The original post has a comment by +Louis Gray acknowledging the existence of the initiative but stating that the coding is sometimes behind the wishes. What I hope for however is not code, but a European (and Asian etc) community manager to be added so that we can join hangouts by the community managers during GMT or other universal time zones instead of PST and EST announcements. Would have loved a chance to speak with the Google Page Community manager +Toby Stein but the time made it impossible. Having some people from a different background in the community mod team would also bring in some counterweight against the US bias. Now that we seem to be the biggest group of users on G+ (according to analyst ComScore) it´s time to get connected and enrich our streams even further. Check out the mother of all European posts: Europe calling: the old giant wakes up and calls on its peeps! https://plus.google.com/u/0/112352920206354603958/posts/PDUi13o9dB1 Comments please on the original topics. Links in the posts.
Image
+1'd post by Craig CockburnI really wish +Google+ would sort out its account migration if they really expect people to connect all their google services. I got +Gmail in the early days, I have a gmail account. Recently though, I signed up with everything else using my own domain including G+. However, connecting the existing gmail account to g+, picasa, chrome login and everything else? No chance. I get to pick from a rubbishy generated gmail username and have to set up an account from scratch. Total fail. It's just a foreign key in a table, surely?? (if it's not you are probably doing something wrong). Surely the brains of Google can sort this out - it's in your interests +Larry Page and +Sergey Brin
Image
+1'd post by Daniel Stoddart"Contrary to how it may sound, I do not want to rid the earth of cars. I just want to use them smarter. Do you really need a 2-ton vehicle to pickup your dry-cleaning? Probably not. Although I do see the appeal in loading a family of 6 into an SUV and traveling to Florida for vacation. That is a totally reasonable use of an automobile. What I really want is clean, walkable, safe, affordable, and family-friendly cities and towns. In a strange way, I kind of want to live in Mayberry."
Image
+1'd post by Joe LancasterPresented without comment... WARNING: Contains Australian language.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewI think I'm finally over the whole "follow back" thing. Took me a while to get out of the mentality, but I think I've managed it.
Image
+1'd post by Baric Dondarion#MegaUpload, a non-US website, was taken down and non-US people were arrested because a US court decided it violated US law. #whatthefuck" --http://twitter.com/bigbrovar/status/160125857321598976
Image
+1'd post by Jonathan SchofieldAn RSS feed for everything The http://well.com has it (it seems*), why can't +Google+ have it. * I'm new to The Well -- only 27 years late!
Image
+1'd post by Steven Hodsonlife would be so much easier with a tank
Image
+1'd post by Robert ScobleOK +Jon Mitchell has some very good points that Google+ is anti websites because of how it shares and attributes things. So, let's all play +Vic Gundotra for a few minutes. Here's what I would do with Google+ if I were him: 1. Make it the world's best sharing system. That means fixing all the problems that Jon points out. I really hate it that when I see someone share something that I can't get back to the original thing shared easily. There's no permalink from the original. That really does suck. 2. Make it possible for applications to share. That means opening up an API to other applications, like Instagram. But if you let Instagram or Path share, you must attribute where it came from and whether it was automatically posted or if someone manually said "please put this on my Google+ account." 3. We still need dramatically better noise controls. Take the team that did the filtering for Gmail and get them to build noise filters for Google+. For instance, I want to remove any item that has the word "Romney" or "Obama" in it, and I want to move those items into a specific "politics" feed. I'd love to do that with any post that has a photograph, or any post that has a video, too. Of course that would let people remove those damn animated gifs, too. 4. I would rethink the mobile client. It still is slow, still doesn't have a good flow, and doesn't feel hand-crafted the way the Path app does. I'm on iPhone, not on Android, though, so that might color my opinion of the thing. 5. Let me have 5,000 different people PER CIRCLE. Right now I can only follow 5,000 total. There's more than that many photographers on Google+ now, so having these stupid limits just infuriates people like me, at best, and enforces a power law at worst. 6. Get rid of the suggested user list. Instead, build one that's algorithmic based on interests. Why isn't there a suggested user list of quilters, for instance? Or of plumbers? Or of saxophone players? Or of dancers? There's not because this list is very poorly thought out and implemented. Plus it increases the amount of spam everyone on that list is getting (both +Loic Le Meur and +Gina Trapani, who are both on the list, have complained about lately (I'm not getting any spam, in comparison, which makes me quite happy). 7. The "suggestions" feature to the right needs to be rethought. Right now it's still suggesting people to me who have never posted and, it's even suggesting people who haven't even set their profile photo yet. That's incredibly lame. Oh, what's really lame? I can't even add any more people because I'm at the limit of 5,000 that people can follow. 8. Let me clean up the interface. I don't want chat, games, pages, hangouts. Instead, give me ability to see more content! 9. On our brand page, give us ability to actually theme the things and make them look like a real brand. 10. Custom domains? Google Buzz used to have them (I still have mine from https://profiles.google.com/scobleizer but why can't new users get them? 11. Why can't my followers see all the things I've liked? Google Buzz used to have that and I really liked that. 12. Let me really share all my circles. Right now if I share a circle with you only 500 people will be shared with you and the UI is incredibly lame. I'd love to point out my favorite 10 people in a circle, or my favorite 50, or my favorite 250, so you can decide whether to only follow 10 of the people in my photography circle, or whether to follow all of them. 13. Give me real blog tools here. For instance, let me post photos INLINE in my text. Same with videos. Why can I only post one video here? That's incredibly lame. Give us better typographical tools, like ability to put pull quotes in text, etc. I could keep going, but, heck, it took us six months to get any kind of noise protection so I'm betting it'll be six more months before a lot of these things get fixed, if then. I guess this is my way of agreeing with a lot of the points that Jon posted, even while I disagree with his overall point that Google+ sucks. There's a lot to like about Google+.
Image
+1'd post by Darren FullerOpen source astronomy software making an appearance on BBC's Country File :-)
Image
+1'd post by Eric Rice
Image
+1'd post by Lisa RoweTruth. Nothing needed on my computer!
Image
+1'd post by Danny O'BrienThis footnote to a one page memo on SOPA I was writing grew into an entire page of its own. It seemed a waste to discard it completely. The widespread discontent over SOPA, particularly when couched in terms of freedom of expression, can be hard to understand by those most directly affected by it. Among the explanations that I have heard is that this reaction is led by and stoked by companies like Google who “profit from piracy”; that it is primarily only felt by those who use piracy websites; and that it is a childish attempt to evade any regulation whatsoever online, and preserve the Internet as a “Wild West” with no rules whatsoever. I think these characterizations reflect a misunderstanding of the motives of those opposing the bill. This whole debate is sticky with earthy metaphors to describe complex technical points, but let me try with just one more analogy: this time to convey not the technology, but the emotional impact of SOPA for those who care about the Internet. Seeking to remove specific domain names from the global naming system for online infringement feels like proposing a bill to allow the government or corporations to order the location of certain foreign booksellers removed from all US-printed maps, on the accusation of selling pirated materials to Americans. At first glance, such a Pirates Using Maps Act would appear to be simply a bizarre approach: as a way to combat book piracy, it does not seem to at all practical. How could we possibly erase all knowledge of the location of booksellers by erasing their physical location from maps? What have maps to do with piracy? One is so overcome with the surrealism of the idea that, once you realise the proposal is serious, it takes a while to scrabble for other objections. Soon, though, they come thick and fast. Surely maps need to remain bastions of objectivity? If we start removing booksellers from our maps without normal due process, surely that will chill bookselling, an important service? Do we really want to set a precedent for literally erasing locations out of existence simply to combat book-pirating as a particular industry’s problem? What about people who simply live on a street next to a bookseller? And so on. Like any metaphor, the mapping from PUMA to SOPA is very imperfect. Internet infringement is clearly more widespread than book infringement. DNS-erasing is a little more efficiently performed than rewriting maps. But I hope it conveys succinctly the emotions of Internet technologists and users, and why they feel that they have stumbled into a painfully nonsensical and depressing battle. I choose booksellers for domain names, to convey the emotional status of a website for many people. It is a source of information, a place where one reads and discovers the news. The domain system is a locating service, as are maps: not the only one, but certainly the ones you expect to trust as a basic, irrefutable source. If you support SOPA and cannot understand those who oppose it, except to project malicious intent on them, I hope the metaphor is useful, and transmits the strong link that many feel between such proposed laws and restrictions freedom of expression in general (“This is book censorship!”), and why frequent counter-arguments in favor of the bill (“But innocent booksellers can challenge the request in court, and restore their street to future maps!”) ring hollow to their ears.
Image
+1'd post by Chirag Shahhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgHKaTl69BU
Image
+1'd post by Justin Bale"We Want Your Retina?" My 37 Hours in Police Custody for Protesting Were an Eye Opener
Image
+1'd post by Courtney Engle Robertson
Image
+1'd post by Neville HobsonBliss! Found a jar of my favourite marmalade in an Asda store. Bought 2 of the 4 there. Happy now until end Feb. (This is ref https://plus.google.com/u/0/116986422495636163350/posts/TKLtYiucVQG ) /cc +Tonia Ries just fyi ;)
Image
+1'd post by Mark Traphagen*If You Like Sharing Links, You’ll Hate What Facebook Is Doing To Them * Forcing users to sign up for an app to view a link is far from "frictionless sharing."
Image
+1'd post by Christoph BauerTrue: "it is far more comforting to believe that the disadvantaged are responsible for their own problems (...), than it is to accept that our system is not fair and to acknowledge that misfortune could happen to us at any point." http://www.rsablogs.org.uk/2011/social-economy/big-society-battle-cognitive-dissonance/
Image
+1'd post by Nicole SimonWorking with Social Media in any way? You need to see this This is +Jeremiah Owyang's presentation from Leweb where he talks about the "Social Business Hierarchy of Needs" and the state of social business. What sounds boring on the outside is in reality a well thought out summary of the current state of what is needed to be successful in social. And not, that is not the usual "you need to go xyz and do this" but a real foundation. While it does look corporate only, it applies to all other endeavours in social as well. Having the slide of the pyramid is invaluable because as anybody working with corporations and organiziations knows: they all want to start at the top without building the foundation - and it just does not work. Now we have a pretty picture for it. On his blog he shares not only the slides but additional material, go watch it and share it. http://bit.ly/uW70wW
Image
+1'd post by Anita Bmeh. we hate US only.
Image
+1'd post by Tony SidawayGoogle Currents. This doesn't seem to be available in the UK yet.
Image
+1'd post by Guy DoyenVia +Jen Baptist
Image
+1'd post by Peter Hartmann+Ugo Bardi has a guest post on Planet3.0. »During the past few years, the financial system gave to the world a clear signal when the prices of all natural commodities spiked up to levels never seen before. If prices are high, then there is a supply problem. Since most of the commodities we use are non-renewable – crude oil, for instance – it is at least reasonable to suppose that we have a depletion problem. Yet, the reaction of leaders, decision makers, and economic pundits of all kinds was – and still is – to ignore the physical basis of the economic system and promote economic growth as the solution to all our problems; the more, the better. But, if depletion is the real problem, it should be obvious that growth can only make it worse. After all, if we grow we consume more resources and that will accelerate depletion. So, why are our leaders so fixated on growth? Can’t they understand that it is a colossal mistake? Are they stupid or what? Things are not so simple, as usual.«
Image
+1'd post by Fraser CainI had almost the same idea rattling around in my brain, so kudos to +Carter Gibson for expressing it even better than I could. +Amanda Blain had a great perspective too. I was going to say that Google's focus on celebrities, although a good marketing strategy, will hamper the long term growth of the service. As Carter says, it puts the spotlight on people who don't share very much, and rarely interact at all. This isn't inclusive, it's a throwback to the same old broadcast model that old media has been trying to keep alive. It's following Twitter's playbook. We're in a transition, though, moving from a broadcast model to a distributed model where people are talking to each other. Google will be way ahead of the curve if they figure out how to help people find people they can interact with. To match new people with the experienced connectors. The suggested user list is a step backwards. And the recommended users you see in the right-hand menu is worthless too. It's recommending people I might know, but they're essentially zombie users, who created an account and then disappeared. In fact, the top "Suggestion" for me right now is someone who closed their account, and I can only share with them by email. If I was Google, I'd take a page from Empire Avenue. Figure out who's active and interesting and recommend those people. They should be able to tell who's interested in science, for example, and suggest users who post a lot about science - doesn't Twitter already do that?
Image
+1'd post by Bill Liao 2 Dec, 2011 Ranil Senanayake Colombo, Development, Environment The World Meteorological Organization, part of the United Nations, have just stated that the warmest 13 years of average global temperatures have all occurred in the 15 years since 1997. That has contributed to extreme weather conditions that increase the intensity of droughts and heavy precipitation across the world, it said. “Our science is solid and it proves unequivocally that the world is warming and that this warming is due to human activities,” WMO Deputy Secretary-General Jerry Lengoasa told reporters in Durban. This view, articulated by a responsible organization should be recognized and acted upon by society at all levels. There are also the disturbing data sets that clearly show a co-relation between temperature and concentrations of greenhouse gasses. While it is an undeniable fact that global temperature and atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide are interrelated. The question is when was it initiated? Once a change is initiated, that there exists obvious feedback mechanisms that keeps driving the process, until a regulatory mechanism, such as glaciations, intervenes. Thus the geologic past is marked by a constant pattern of dry regimes with the water locked up as glacial ice alternating with wet regimes awash with unlocked glacial water. The oscillation from one state to the other involves massive heat transfer processes and accounts for the phenomena of global warming and cooling. There is debate, certainly on the frequency and amplitude of the changes before us and of the causes that drive such changes. However, if there is one unifying feature to the debate it is that: ‘There is a change in the climate.’ This change is already affecting both the quality of human life and quantity of glaciers the world over. A result of melting land glaciers will make the ocean levels will go up. Models looking at the affect of an 5 – 6 inch rise in sea level over the next thirty years suggests 16 -34 million environmental refugees, depending on the preparedness of the affected regimes. The global effort on addressing the problems of climate change is also hampered by the fact that the IPCC is consisted only of people who are nominated by their Governments. Commenting on this feature Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institute says, “Its Governments who nominate people, you will find in many chapters that there are people who are not scientists at all”. This has allowed such fundamental scientific and economic realities such as differences between biomass carbon and fossil carbon to become blurred. One obvious result is that, there is no differentiation of value between these two pools in current carbon accounting by the IPCC. Until this reality is recognized, disjointed markets will prevail. Carbon dioxide is not the only contributor to warming on the planet; there is Methane, Oxides of Nitrogen, water vapour etc. In the atmosphere water vapour accounts for 60-80% of its natural greenhouse effect. Water vapour has been the most dominant greenhouse determinant for the atmosphere and has probably been so over the last four billion years. In terms of water vapour, forests account for some 48% of all terrestrial evapotranspiration. Thus the loss of forests worldwide, through a climate or biological event, could result in initiating changes in the climate system. As Walter Jehne of the CSIRO states, “It follows that the destruction of up to 80% of earth’s primary (old growth) forests by humans during industrialization could have resulted in a marked loss of the natural cooling capacity and therefore increased global warming.” The deforestation of the planet could very well have been the trigger that has pushed us along the current course. Sri Lanka was no stranger to the process, forests that remained largely inviolate since their time of formation was felled and destroyed within a period of two hundred years. The natural cooling capacity of the Island was reduced by over 80%. This conversion of the massive forests into carbon dioxide would also have been a significant contribution to increasing carbon dioxide concentrations at that time. Could the massive rates of deforestation and the removal of the cooling factor that initiated the warming trends that were then amplified by the increases in carbon dioxide as a consequence of the industrial revolution? This process being amplified through the burning of fossil fuels. The Vostock Ice core data looking at past atmospheres seems to suggest such a scenario. The most obvious way is to address the problem is by reducing reliance on fossil carbon as an index of human development, but there may be other ways as well. One interesting possibility requires us to go back to the forests. Forests produce vast quantities of Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) that enable the condensation of clouds in the atmosphere. Clouds occur in many states, from the thin haze clouds precipitated by pollution and dust to the thick cumulus clouds precipitated by forests and oceans. Each type provides a certain degree of shading from solar radiation, a phenomenon termed albedo or, “the amount of incoming solar radiation reflected back into space”. The albedo of the planet determines the amount of sunlight reaching the surface, the amount of sunlight reaching the surface in turn determines the heat of the atmosphere. The mean value for reflecting solar radiation back into space by cloud albedo is about 30%. The cooling effect of this action is so great that a 1-2 % increase in the albedo of the planet would be enough to reduce the warming effect of current CO2 levels back to early-industrial levels. Creating a 1% cooling by albedo can help definitely stabilize the climate. Restoration of the cloud creating potential of terrestrial ecosystems has to be seen as a critically important activity and the financial instruments designed to mitigate the effect of global warming must recognize this potential. This means designing and implementing long maturing, multi age, and multi species systems that mimic or are analogous to the natural mature ecosystem.
Image
+1'd post by Rotimi Oyewole42,000 songs scrobbled on Last.fm over 5 years. I'm a big Last.fm fan. Its pretty cool to see how my music listening has changed over the years. The API is far-reaching, so it can scrape my listening data from almost any music player, whether its iTunes, Spotify or Google Music. Last.fm is a perfect example of passive sharing, or what Facebook has branded "Frictionless Sharing". But its a bit different because of the destination - my Last.fm profile rather than the social town hall that is Facebook. Imagine if I shared every song--all 42,000 of them--to my Facebook friends as I listened to each. Not a particularly good or useful experience for me or my friends. This is another reason why curation matters. If I always yell, then eventually what I'm yelling about loses significance. The same goes for music and a lot of other "frictionless sharing". Maybe we're not supposed to yell all the time.
Image
+1'd post by KossoGood morning. Here, have some lovely, potty-mouthed rapjizzle to brighten up your day .... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3Jv9fNPjgk
Image
+1'd post by TNWAre you happy with the way Google+ notifications work?
Image
+1'd post by Louis GrayI find +Thomas Power very thoughtful and entertaining. Besides, he always wears these great pink shirts and has an incredible accent. He's always thinking about trends on the web and business networking. I have no comment regarding his speculation on Google+, but how could I not share a well-made video that is self-addressed to me? Enjoy.
Image
+1'd post by Robert ScobleI love +Vic Gundotra's philosophy but find it rings hollow. If it matters, why doesn't Google+ give us better tools for curating things here? I can't share all my +1's for instance. I also, when I share, add duplication noise all over the place. I also can't curate on top of other people's shares (their comments get lost if I reshare their items). And I can't remove noise from searches, or from my main feed, which would help me curate better. Finally, there isn't a good API so my favorite curation tools, like Flipboard on the iPad, can't work on Google+. Wake me up when Google+ actually enables me to curate.
Image
+1'd post by Chris MessinaAddendum: It appears that the goal of my post was somewhat misunderstood. I'm still learning more about the incident at UC Davis and trying to piece together what happened, so I can try to make the incomprehensible somehow more comprehensible. For example, this video, shared in the comments by +Tim Bonnemann, again presents additional information that adds to my understanding of what happened. Clearly, having so many different perspectives of the same event leads you to see things that you may have otherwise missed: http://youtu.be/K8Uj1cV97XQ In any case, my original question wasn't so much "did the fact that the officer warn the students before he maced them justify his actions?" — I was more interested in the personal response of the viewer, i.e. "does the fact that he acted so coldly and intentionally change how you feel about his actions?" There is a commission being set up that will investigate the rightness or wrongness of the use of pepper spray in this incident; already two of the officers are on administrative leave [3] pending further investigation. No where in my original post did I state my personal opinion about how I felt about Lt. John Pike's actions, and yet many people assumed that because I posed my question a certain way, that somehow I was attempting to justifying his actions. I was not. I think it's shameful that the police would use chemical weapons on unarmed, peaceful students, given the information that I have. Certainly more information will come forth in the next 30 days, and I would hope that the next time I ask a question seeking more clarification or enlightenment, I'm given the benefit of the doubt, as I gave to the actors in this incident. -- Original: Continuing the #OccupyUCDavis thread from yesterday, +John Neyer pointed out this video that captures an interesting moment before Lt. John Pike deployed his pepper spray on seated protesters. In the video, it shows how he when he calmly from protester to proteser and warned each of them that they would be "subject to the use of force" if they failed to move. Moments later, he made good on that threat. If you watch this clip in a series, inserting the video below in front of the clips that went viral [1][2], does it change how you feel about the incident? /cc +Adam McBride • +Alexander Howard • +Alexis Madrigal • +Tim O'Reilly • +Tim Bonnemann • +Rick Klau • +Jack Hebert • +Xeni Jardin #occupywallstreet #ows [1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmJmmnMkuEM [2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AdDLhPwpp4 [3] http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/11/police-chief-explains-use-of-pepper-spray-at-occupy-protest/1
Image
+1'd post by KossoJust saw my first Google Music 'post' here. How to irritate and alienate a huge amount of your users : release products and functions that can't be used by people outside the USA. Tsk. The arrogance. Dear Google Plus, please just add an 'audio' feature. Support oEmbed / Soundcloud etc. ( cc : +Vic Gundotra +Bradley Horowitz ) Why no audio posts? I'm not talking music. I'm well aware that the labels and licensing holds that stuff up - and it's not your fault. You'd solve a lot of problems and also potentially create a huge new raft of opportunities here if you'd support simple audio posts. ps: Also I think it's HUGELY unfair for Plus to only support embedded Vimeo as a third party media provider - which does the same job as Youtube. Sure, there's a lot of nice video in Vimeo, but why are they 'blessed'? Are they paying you? Are you paying them? Many media providers support the required oEmbed to support the embeds as Vimeo does. (I also note that using Vimeo also throws up the same non-https warnings dues to the iframe implementation.) pps: Here's the post with the Google Music embed in it : https://plus.google.com/u/0/107117483540235115863/posts/ZtGXEJEC1mH
Image
+1'd post by Max HuijgenRock a village. Google Music Sharing on Google+ Has Arrived in America that is.... The most global company debuts it´s music service to only 300 million people I thought the days were gone that movies were scheduled by studios to release months later in other parts of the world and that music was now liberated from country barriers. Yes, I know about rights and the music industry, but why the hack can´t you use your market power and stand up against the record companies and truly innovate. Why not demand a world wide release and break with this completely dated model. Will region codes return? Hugely disappointing from the one company I didn´t expect it from. edit: and if you look at this http://music.google.com/about/tour/ and watch the share functionality it will be clear that this won´t work on G+ with people from a hundred countries. This is not ´Rock the world´, but ´Rock a village´. Look at G+. We are a global village by now. Please adjust your business models to it and roll out features worldwide. Look at the Itunes map http://j.mp/rsVCSP and just do it better. That´s what I expect from Google as so far they have always been showing a global approach so why stop now?
Image
+1'd post by Eric RiceILL
Image
+1'd post by Eric RicexD
Image
+1'd post by Ade Oshineye
Image
+1'd post by KossoDear Google Plus, (share this post if you agree) We want to see our favourite posts in one place. Please add a link to the left which I can click on a see a list of all the posts here which I have +1'd. I'm getting tired of asking. Yet you seem to keep adding things which people are not asking for. Like the 'What's hot' link and the YouTube 'kind of playlist' thing. You are called Plus. We Plus things when we like them. We want to see them again some day. Give us this very, very easy-for-you-to-implement filter link for the left menu. PLEASE SHARE THIS POST IF YOU AGREE. DONT JUST PLUS IT (though thanks!). SHARE IT. SPREAD THE WORD! NO ONE ELSE (but the author) CAN 'READ' A PLUS! And no, I do not mean the +1 tab on the profile page. So many people think that's it. It's shocking how many people comment without reading this post. That tab lists the 'external web urls' on which I have clicked a +1 button. NOT the Google Plus posts I have +1'd ....
Image
+1'd post by Daniel RenferDid Joshua Norton leave behind a succession plan? Who should we be hailing as the true Emperor of the United States (and protector of Mexico) now?
Image
+1'd post by Jason M
Image
+1'd post by Steven Hodsonawesome .. cute .. and all things warm and fuzzy .. not to mention some pretty funny ones
Image
+1'd post by Eric JacklitschWith "The Thing" (2011) prequel getting mixed reviews I would like to draw your attention to Peter Watts's superb and award-winning short story from January 2010, "The Things". Regardless of your feelings on the remake you will not be disappointed in this short fiction. Read it or listen to it in mp3 format for free. text here: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/watts_01_10/ audio here: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/audio_01_10/
Image
+1'd post by Armando Lioss
Image
+1'd post by Filippo SalustriCongress declares war on the internet? Really? How fast can we set up top level DNS servers in some other country? I suspect that with a relatively modest investment, the rest of the world could develop the software infrastructure plus a bit of the hardware (the DNS servers, many of which are in the US). Then the rest of the world can just ignore what the US is doing, if it goes through with it. There's 300 million Americans. There's 6.7 billion of the rest of us. We should be able to make do just by ignoring them till they get their shit together.
Image
+1'd post by John HardyMan I hate American imperialism. Halloween go home. Bah humbug!
Image
+1'd post by Tim ColdwellThe evidence is inconsistent with the view that the collapse of the financial system was caused only by the popping of the housing bubble (“accident”) and the herding behavior of financiers rushing to create and market increasingly complex and questionable financial products (“suicide”). Rather, the evidence indicates that senior policymakers repeatedly designed, implemented, and maintained policies that destabilized the global financial system in the decade before the crisis. Moreover, although the major regulatory agencies were aware of the growing fragility of the financial system due to their policies, they chose not to modify those policies, suggesting that “negligent homicide” contributed to the financial system’s collapse.Paper by Ross Levine, Brown University
Image
+1'd post by Abraham WilliamsYou can take the man out of the woods but he can just go back again.
Image
+1'd post by John Jackington#OWS #oocupywallstreet It just occured to me that the American people's reputation may finally be getting a boost overseas.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Power
Image
+1'd post by Dan GillmorIn my latest piece for the Guardian, I explain why the blockade of WikiLeaks by the major payment systems (Visa, MasterCard, PayPal etc.) is a direct threat to free speech -- and why news organizations are shameful in their lack of support for WikiLeaks in this situation. Quote: The point of free speech is not to protect only speech of which we approve. It is, much more importantly, to protect speech we loathe. So, even if you loathe WikiLeaks but revere the ability to speak out – and, among other things, the ability for journalists to persist in their work despite an increasingly restrictive environment – you should be asking yourself a simple question: could this happen to me or some organisation of which I do approve? The answer, of course, is yes. Which is why we all need to be pushing back against this dangerous blockade, and soon.
Image
+1'd post by John BlossomWikiLeaks payments blockade sets dangerous precedent +Dan Gillmor wrote a great piece on major banks cutting off credit card processing for contributions to Wikileaks. One of his many key points: "If this was happening to any traditional media company, it would be a scandal, and the media in general would be screaming about the threat to free speech it represented. While the news media are covering the WikiLeaks situation, they are not offering serious support in ways that matter to an organisation with which they have much more in common than not." Putting aside the political implications of Wikileaks (if that's possible), the anonymous content disclosure service is most threatening to mainstream media news organizations, in part because it challenges their near monopoly on insider information from influential and powerful people and organizations. So if the banks that are the subject of a number of Wikileaks disclosures want to retaliate, then MSM news organizations ultimately benefit, because they would lose a competitor challenging this monopoly of power interests. The love/hate affair with Wikileaks will continue indefinitely, no doubt, in part because it's not always easy to tell when Wikileaks is wearing a white hat or at least a pretty dark gray hat. Efforts to make the Wikileaks model an open source capability might take away some of these concerns. The real struggle, though, is against the over-centralization of information control. Today's information technologies do not require such centralization in most instances, which raises the question of why society as a whole should insist on it. Decentralizing information control, of course, also means more decentralized control of local and global economies. And that, I imagine, is the real fear driving concerns about Wikileaks. Content Nation is no longer a cute idea - it's a powerful reality shifting the fundamental balance of power in society.
Image
+1'd post by KossoVery cool visual representation of how far your posts go, being shared from one to another etc. Yes. Google. Very nice. Now WHAT ABOUT A PLACE TO SEE ALL THE GOOGLE PLUS POSTS I HAVE +1d!!! I'm getting sick of asking for THE EPONYMOUS FEATURE of Google Plus! I want to see my favourite posts!! I also want to see what other people have +1'd And before anyone stupidly fails to actually read what I actually said here, NO, I do NOT mean the +1 tab on my profile. That's for places on the web which I have clicked +1, NOT actual Google Plus posts!!! (Every time I ask for this, some doofus says that's where they are. Its not. Read this post again before you make yourself look like an idiot) ;p Thanks ;)
Image
+1'd post by Michael TobisRushkoff on Occupy Movement is especially interesting. I really want this to be true, but I'm not sure I believe it.
Image
+1'd post by John HardyIf I could force you to listen to this I would. It should be made mandatory listening. From Gil Scott Heron ("the revolution will not be televised") on the election of Reagan 30 years ago. Heron sadly passed away in May this year. Please listen to this and tell me what part isn't even more true today that it was when it was written. Well, the first thing I want to say is..."Mandate my ass!" Because it seems as though we've been convinced that 26% of the registered voters, not even 26% of the American people, but 26% of the registered voters form a mandate – or a landslide. 21% voted for Skippy and 3, 4% voted for somebody else who might have been running. But, oh yeah, I remember. In this year that we have now declared the year from Shogun to Reagan, I remember what I said about Reagan...meant it. Acted like an actor...Hollyweird. Acted like a liberal. Acted like General Franco when he acted like governor of California, then he acted like a republican. Then he acted like somebody was going to vote for him for president. And now we act like 26% of the registered voters is actually a mandate. We're all actors in this I suppose. What has happened is that in the last 20 years, America has changed from a producer to a consumer. And all consumers know that when the producer names the tune...the consumer has got to dance. That's the way it is. We used to be a producer – very inflexible at that, and now we are consumers and, finding it difficult to understand. Natural resources and minerals will change your world. The Arabs used to be in the 3rd World. They have bought the 2nd World and put a firm down payment on the 1st one. Controlling your resources will control your world. This country has been surprised by the way the world looks now. They don't know if they want to be Matt Dillon or Bob Dylan. They don't know if they want to be diplomats or continue the same policy - of nuclear nightmare diplomacy. John Foster Dulles ain't nothing but the name of an airport now. The idea concerns the fact that this country wants nostalgia. They want to go back as far as they can – even if it's only as far as last week. Not to face now or tomorrow, but to face backwards. And yesterday was the day of our cinema heroes riding to the rescue at the last possible moment. The day of the man in the white hat or the man on the white horse - or the man who always came to save America at the last moment – someone always came to save America at the last moment – especially in "B" movies. And when America found itself having a hard time facing the future, they looked for people like John Wayne. But since John Wayne was no longer available, they settled for Ronald Reagan – and it has placed us in a situation that we can only look at – like a "B" movie. Come with us back to those inglorious days when heroes weren't zeros. Before fair was square. When the cavalry came straight away and all-American men were like Hemingway to the days of the wondrous "B" movie. The producer underwritten by all the millionaires necessary will be Casper "The Defensive" Weinberger – no more animated choice is available. The director will be Attila the Haig, running around frantically declaring himself in control and in charge. The ultimate realization of the inmates taking over at the asylum. The screenplay will be adapted from the book called "Voodoo Economics" by George "Papa Doc" Bush. Music by the "Village People" the very military "Macho Man." "Company!!!" "Macho, macho man!" "Two-three-four." "He likes to be – well, you get the point." "Huuut! Your left! Your left! Your left...right, left, right, left, right...!" A theme song for saber-rallying and selling wars door-to-door. Remember, we're looking for the closest thing we can find to John Wayne. Cliches abound like kangaroos – courtesy of some spaced out Marlin Perkins, a Reagan contemporary. Cliches like, "itchy trigger finger" and "tall in the saddle" and "riding off or on into the sunset." Cliches like, "Get off of my planet by sundown!" More so than cliches like, "he died with his boots on." Marine tough the man is. Bogart tough the man is. Cagney tough the man is. Hollywood tough the man is. Cheap steak tough. And Bonzo's substantial. The ultimate in synthetic selling: A Madison Avenue masterpiece – a miracle – a cotton-candy politician...Presto! Macho! "Macho, macho man!" Put your orders in America. And quick as Kodak your leaders duplicate with the accent being on the dupe - cause all of a sudden we have fallen prey to selective amnesia - remembering what we want to remember and forgetting what we choose to forget. All of a sudden, the man who called for a blood bath on our college campuses is supposed to be Dudley "God-damn" Do-Right? "You go give them liberals hell Ronnie." That was the mandate. To the new "Captain Bly" on the new ship of fools. It was doubtlessly based on his chameleon performance of the past - as a liberal democrat – as the head of the Studio Actor's Guild. When other celluloid saviors were cringing in terror from McCarthy – Ron stood tall. It goes all the way back from Hollywood to hillbilly. From liberal to libelous, from "Bonzo" to Birch idol...born again. Civil rights, women's rights, gay rights...it's all wrong. Call in the cavalry to disrupt this perception of freedom gone wild. God damn it...first one wants freedom, then the whole damn world wants freedom. Nostalgia, that's what we want...the good ol' days...when we gave'em hell. When the buck stopped somewhere and you could still buy something with it. To a time when movies were in black and white – and so was everything else. Even if we go back to the campaign trail, before six-gun Ron shot off his face and developed hoof-in-mouth. Before the free press went down before full-court press. And were reluctant to review the menu because they knew the only thing available was – Crow. Lon Chaney, our man of a thousand faces - no match for Ron. Doug Henning does the make-up - special effects from Grecian Formula 16 and Crazy Glue. Transportation furnished by the David Rockefeller of Remote Control Company. Their slogan is, "Why wait for 1984? You can panic now...and avoid the rush." So much for the good news... As Wall Street goes, so goes the nation. And here's a look at the closing numbers – racism's up, human rights are down, peace is shaky, war items are hot - the House claims all ties. Jobs are down, money is scarce – and common sense is at an all-time low with heavy trading. Movies were looking better than ever and now no one is looking because, we're starring in a "B" movie. And we would rather have John Wayne...we would rather have John Wayne. "You don't need to be in no hurry. You ain't never really got to worry. And you don't need to check on how you feel. Just keep repeating that none of this is real. And if you're sensing, that something's wrong, Well just remember, that it won't be too long Before the director cuts the scene...yea." "This ain't really your life, Ain't really your life, Ain't really ain't nothing but a movie." [Refrain repeated about 25 times or more in an apocalyptic crescendo with a military cadence.] "This ain't really your life, Ain't really your life, Ain't really ain't nothing but a movie."
Image
+1'd post by Eoghann IrvingCalling all Science Fiction/Sci-Fi/Skiffy Fans I was surprised to discover that the Google+ Shared Circles Database (http://goo.gl/PrcGo) does not contain a circle of Sci-Fi lovers. Fans of specific shows are there, but not fans of the genre as a whole. This must be fixed. If you like to watch/read/discuss science fiction movies/tv/books/comics then please +1 this post or make a comment. Please share the post, but point people back towards this one so I can create the circle and submit it. https://plus.google.com/u/0/117668392750579292609/posts/XS1tKo8aMCo
Image
+1'd post by Steven Hodsonand back to where it all started from - hope you enjoyed today's selection #SAMjam bonus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sFupDAwvo
Image
+1'd post by Hubert Motley, JrA conversation earlier today has me hunting down old tabs for a post on my blog: http://www.groonk.net/blog During the search I found this comic on Kate Beaton's excellent webcomic, Hark a Vagrant. Introducing: Strong Female Characters
Image
+1'd post by Michael Tobis
Image
+1'd post by Charles Daney"An analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy."
Image
+1'd post by Rob GordonOCCUPY GOOGLE BUZZ Some of you may have seen the rather harshly titled "BuzzKill" post by a Google executive who had never used Buzz talking about how much they had "learned" from it. He said the main thing they learned was the importance of "privacy" in the design of networks like this. I think he took the wrong lessons away from Google Buzz. In fact, I have come to realize that when Google talks about privacy, they really seem to mean "we own your friends and contacts now" but that is perhaps a post for another time. For now, I just want to explain a bit about post I where I jokingly said we should "Occupy Buzz" - before I realized that some people were quite serious about what Google is doing, and what is being lost - maybe forever.. I also made a shared document - also half joking, with a list of demands. The people in that discussion didn't want to call these "demands" - we didn't have any leverage over Google, and to get any we would have to threaten some kind of action against Google, and I don't think anyone wanted to go there. For this reason, I will call these "requests" but for at least one of the issues that is maybe a little too soft. First though, I what to remind people what happened on Buzz when they launched Google+. First, understand that Buzz was an active and dynamic community. Yes, it could be a mosh pit at times but this was back when Google considered us all to be equals - before they became celebrity infatuated, and the products was technically excellent - including its privacy features. I think most people assumed that there would be a new generation of the product, and it would probably be "rebranded" - but I don't think anyone expected that Google would just throw out many members of that community as soon as they were no longer useful to them. When I got my invitation in the first round to join Google+ I was really very flattered. They I quickly realized they had left many of my friends behind. People on Google Buzz were understandibly pissed - they were Google's most loyal users and had been looking forward to the next generation of Google's social networking product, which had been long rumored. I started using the invitations I had here to invite people on Google Buzz - which was ridiculous because they never should have had to have been "invited" at all - they should have been part of the launch here. I recieved profuse thanks from many of them who also expressed their huge disappointment in Google. I now realize that the primary reason I was likely included in this first round, was because I am using my real name. Some people on Google Buzz, for various personal reasons, did elect to use pseudonyms. I'm sorry, maybe I am expressing this too strongly, but I think that is just rude, some of these people were even in Google's "Trusted Tester Program" so this brings us to our first "request": 1. That Google Corporation allow all people who were active users of Google Buzz access to Google+ using the name they used on Buzz. This is really just common decency and is long overdue. Google is letting celebreties and people they think are influential to use pseudonyms, but they won't extend the same courtesy to their most loyal users - are you kidding? This should be taken care of as soon as humanly possible, but certainly before Buzz is shut down. Which brings us to our second request: 2. That Google Corporation make a good faith effort to restore any accounts and their data to full working order if they were suspended or deleted. This one also seems like a no brainer to me. If Google has harmed anyone, they should do their best to repair the damage they did - especially in the aggressive account suspensions and deletions in the early days of Google+ - which hit some Buzz users. Google should try to help them recover their friends lists, photos, and any other data they losts during these actions. You can't just walk away from a car accident. 3. Google should make an effort to provide all features that were available on Google Buzz on Google+ before Buzz is shut down. An important thing for Google+ users to understand is that Google actually removed features and functionality with the launch of Google+ - which is really a corportized version of Google Buzz. With the exception of circles, Google Buzz could do everything Google+ could do and more. Even the circles was really just the "groups" in Google Buzz with a better interface, except that here Google has taken more ownership of your friends and contacts. The list is really pretty long, but we haven't compliled it all in one place yet. One person posted the following: - Multiple media post (multiple links and images) - Reader sharing - Personal blog/flow sharing - Anonymous and Organization posting - Our contacts grouping for Buzz (no clear links between contacts & circles) That list is really not even close to being complete. Someone here did a complete list that I will try to find. Beyond this, there is no consensus - it is still being discussed. Several people mentioned the posting by email feature is no longer available, and that Google+ cannot really be used on non-Android devices. One person wants Google to pay for the Android apps she lost when Google deleteted her data - which certainly seems reasonable. Then their are a bunch of people who don't want Google Buzz to be shut down at all. I really didn't expect Chinese involvement in what was mostly a joke post, but they seem quite passionate about it. Apparently, Google+ is blocked in their country, but they can still use Google Buzz. Here is the link to one of the #occupybuzz discussions - there are several: https://plus.google.com/102170431816592344972/posts/CzU8zUPeLK2 The attached image is similar to a poster that was on the wall of a friends dorm room in college. It was titled "*Last Gesture of Definace in the Face of Hopelessness*. I thought it was appropriate. #occupybuzz
Image
+1'd post by Araz Zeyniyev
Image
+1'd post by Vago DamitioThere seems to be this general anger but no one is really certain exactly where to aim it. Which by the way, is certainly by design - we've been fooled, manipulated, and screwed but there is no obvious single perpetrator - it's like a bunch of zombies milling around and suddenly they start to realize "Hey, we're zombies and we're pissed about it and we're going to fuck shit up" but they don't know who made them zombies so they just attack everything...that's what these protests are like to me - zombies who are starting to gain consciousness and the consciousness is spreading...but the zombie masters certainly have a few more tricks up their sleeves. #1 is to turn the other zombies against the waking zombies.
Image
+1'd post by Max Hodges
Image
+1'd post by Jeffrey Powers26 Years ago today, Token Ring was introduced by #IBM. Also, John Sculley resigns from Apple. http://www.dayintechhistory.com/dith/october-15-happy-birthday-token-ring/
Image
+1'd post by Hubert Motley, JrYou know that THE THING prequel that's out today? Why not read this instead. The Things by Peter Watts is set in John Carpenter's 1980s THE THING and is told from The Thing's point of view. It's quite lovely. Read: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/watts_01_10/ Listen: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/audio_01_10/
Image
+1'd post by Daniel TreadwellGoogle+Blog: Google+ posts and comments for WordPress With the huge amount of interest surrounding my Google+ Blog concept on http://minimali.se, the number one request was that it be made available as a WordPress plugin. With so many people asking for it, how could I say no? What does it do? Google+Blog will automatically retrieve your public posts and the comments associated with them and display them as normal WordPress posts, along with all your Google+ comments. They will also include any media that you have added to your Google+ post (photos, albums, articles and video). It will update every hour or so (providing you have people going to your blog) and will not require any intervention from you whatsoever. Can I see it? +Colby Brown has been kind enough to help me finalise the plugin and has also integrated it into his blog. He has a separate page that just displays his G+ posts and their associated comments. Check it out at: http://www.colbybrownphotography.com/blog/category/plusfeed/ What options does it have? The plugin is quite configurable with the ability to easily change your API Key, Profile ID, Post History (how many historical posts are imported), WP Post Status, Categories and Tags. How can I get it? There are two versions available for download, one free, the other paid ($10). There is no limitation placed on the free version, but it does contain a link at the bottom of your imported posts. I have put a lot of work into this and don't believe that $10 is too much to ask for the version without a link. The plugin can be downloaded from http://www.minimali.se/google+blog/ Usage and terms This is only the first release of the plugin and it will be updated on a regular basis. I welcome feedback and suggestions and strongly encourage bug reports. It has undergone testing, but I am not liable for any problems that are caused by this plugin. Once you have downloaded the plugin, add it to WordPress via the Plugins menu and activate it. Finish setting it up under 'Settings' -> 'Google+Blog Options'. If you need further integration message me and we will see what can be worked out. API Key You will need to sign up for a Google+ API Key before you are able to use this extension. To get one, go here: http://code.google.com/apis/console/. If needed, create a project then flick the Google+ API switch under Services. From there your Simple API Access key will be available under 'API Access'. +Robert Scoble +Chris Pirillo +Ade Oshineye +Louis Gray +Ryan Crowe +Christina Trapolino +Natalie Villalobos +Dave Cohen +Chris Messina +Johnathan Chung +DeWitt Clinton +Will Norris +Ahmed Zeeshan +Chris Chabot
Image
+1'd post by Abraham Williams
Image
+1'd post by Jonathan SchofieldDamn, Paul Allen is good…
Image
+1'd post by Lisa RoweWho else loves Doctor Who and is unreasonably excited for tomorrow's episode?
Image
+1'd post by Anita Boh what tangled webs we weave....
Image
+1'd post by Sahar PerryThank you for sharing this story +Hassan Moradi
Image
+1'd post by Brenda CurtisHow the hell do I opt out, permamute any game messages and invites? All I see now is an option to mute each one individually and that's not enough. I do not want ANY messages from games or invites and I have already blocked about 30 people for sending them to me.
Image
+1'd post by Ryan DrewreySo..... there are people new to G+ who don't know about Mr Weebl...... Yay!! I get to repost some fun stuff then........ Carry on.
Image
+1'd post by Jennifer OuelletteFrom +Greg Laden: How do you know when alternative views are real alternatives, and thus should be considered in a "balanced view" vs. when those views are not any longer valid and should be ignored? This sounds like a hard thing to do but it is not as hard as you might think. I suggest two different approaches: "Tipping Points" and "Clues that Something is Wrong Here." http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/09/balancing_acts_in_science.php
Image
+1'd post by Rafe Needleman
Image
+1'd post by Paul FaradayAmerica: you are a bunch of primitive fuckers. How do you justify capital punishment in this day and age?
Image
+1'd post by Martin WongRead this in the Metro this morning but the guy actually finished the house a few years ago. His website goes into all sorts of details; why, how and plenty of pics! http://www.simondale.net/house/
Image
+1'd post by Dustin WyattI think synchronous communication (telephone call, meeting) is rude when asynchronous communication (email, text, IM, G+) is sufficient. Unfortunately, most people I know don't care. I'm on the verge of going postal on the next phone call I get.
Image
+1'd post by Kirsty LawerBLOODY BANGER!
Image
+1'd post by Lucian RandolphHey Google, Hypocritical Behavior Builds Fury Everybody should go to the original post and +1 all the comments asking about the apparent pseudonym exception for http://Will.i.am. So far the only comments with 2 digits of +1's are the questions regarding the obvious hypocrisy. I hate to sound negative, but I bet Vic and Natalie completely ignore the subject and the questions.
Image
+1'd post by Lucian RandolphMore Google Stupidity Regarding Real Names Here's a great post on the problem that Google Plus is creating for itself. If the restriction on pseudonyms and mononyms is so DAMN important, why is it buried in the new applicant process?
Image
+1'd post by Ade Oshineyehttp://infrequently.org/2011/09/things-the-w3c-should-stop-doing/ "The SemWeb folks use the term “web” in a hopeful, forward looking way that nobody else does. Their technology is showing promise inside firewalls but their work has near zero relationship to the actual, messy web we swim in every day. The result is that their narrow constituency isn’t the one that animates whatever legitimacy the W3C might enjoy, and therefore their influence in the W3C is out of all proportion to their organizational and web-wide value." "The time has come for the W3C to grab the mantle of the web, shake off its self-doubt, and move to a place where doing good isn’t measured by numbers of specs and activities, but by impact for web developers."
Image
+1'd post by Zee M Kaneyeah there is no RSS for search results right?
Image
+1'd post by Robert SchultzFree Press Vs Police 1 - 0 Half-time or full-time score?
Image
+1'd post by Tim O'ReillyBill Clinton says that GOP climate denial makes America "look like a joke" to the rest of the world. "If you're an American," Clinton said, "the best thing you can do is make it unacceptable" to be a climate change denier. "We look like a joke, right? You can't win the nomination of one of our major parties if you admit that the scientists are right?" Via Nick Kristof on Twitter
Image
+1'd post by Filippo SalustriA story everyone should know about.
Image
+1'd post by Tony SidawayThe Rupertgate affair rose from the dead this year because of the determination, hard work and journalistic skills of a team working at The Guardian. Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation and the Metropolitan Police Service are both implicated. And so the Metropolitan Police are doing something about it. Yes, they're going to ask a judge to order the Guardian journalists to identify their anonymous sources.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewWeb killed Postmodernism?
Image
+1'd post by Charles Daney+George Musser says "I always knew we humans have a rather tenuous grip on the concept of time, but I never realized quite how tenuous it was until a couple of weeks ago, when I attended a conference on the nature of time organized by the Foundational Questions Institute."
Image
+1'd post by Peter DubowskiTrue baptism.
Image
+1'd post by Patrick MurphyWhat could possibly go wrong? Anyone else read the Rifters trilogy by Peter Watts (Starfish, Maelstrom, Behemoth)?
Image
+1'd post by davey ewarthttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/28/powerpoint-party-switzerland-ban?CMP=twt_gu PowerPoint presentations are dumb
Image
+1'd post by John Hardyvia +davey ewart I charge that the groups which call themselves free market thinktanks are nothing of the kind. They are public relations agencies, secretly lobbying for the corporations and multi-millionaires who finance them. If they wish to refute this claim, they should disclose their funding. Until then, whenever you hear the term free market thinktank, think of a tank, crushing democracy, driven by big business.
Image
+1'd post by Julian Harrishttp://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/sep/07/michael-moore-hated-man-america "You ever see a Navy Seal get stabbed? The look on their face is the one we have when we discover we're out of shampoo. The pencil-stabber probably became a convert to the paperless society that day, once the Seal was done with him and his 16th-century writing device."
Image
+1'd post by Colin Lucas-MuddNo Black Tea Either What a superb demonstration of the relationship between the political divide, the narrow minded, and those who don't want to be confused by the facts. Thanks to +Paul Comac for the re-share.
Image
+1'd post by DaFreakHow long is a piece of string? It sounds like a ridiculous question... but it isn't. This hour long journey to find out the length of a certain piece of string will blow your mind. This trip takes you from the classical to the quantum and leaves you with more questions than answers. Easily one of the best episodes from BBC's Horizon. I know that an hour of your time is a lot to ask for, but believe me, it's worth it.
Image
+1'd post by Nick LewisGreat idea but can it also share to your feed? Well no it doesn't seem to is the answer I can find. I love how http://500px.com and some other sites allow you to +1 and share... or am I missing something?
Image
+1'd post by Andre Nantel
Image
+1'd post by Stef KunzerSharing this on from +Guy Kawasaki but need to put my own spin on it (and wanted the correct link). The article makes for very interesting reading, and for someone in the UK the parallelism to our current government is a little scary. We're nowhere near as far down the path as the US, but some tactics are clear, including (now in power) dismantling government.
Image
+1'd post by Marek KozubekJust a repost, listen to it, worth it.
Image
+1'd post
Image
+1'd post by Dan GillmorMust read: A stunning dissection of America's utterly rotten political system by former Republican staffer. If this doesn't make you fear for the country's future, nothing will.
Image
+1'd post by Anthony De RosaWhat's the thinking behind making someone a "Suggested User" if they rarely post or have never posted on Google+? Celebrities are consistently some of the most boring people to follow, with a few exceptions, on social networks.
Image
+1'd post by Bud GibsonSo, one theory I've had is that the Internet, as realized in social media, is principally a broadcast platform for people living in California. Looking at the PICKS on Google's Suggested User List, 7 of the 17 are from California. Only two currently reside outside outside the US (though Muhammad Yunus may in fact reside in Tennessee). If you think of the Suggested Users List as an interest graph prototype, it's pretty tilted toward California. Apparently, more localized interests are a work in progress, but one has to wonder how exactly. A reasonable approach for creating interests graphs is the "by hand" method Google used here. They simply asked each other who they found interesting coupled with some "algorithmic" approaches. Some would call that an editorial process. How does such a process replicate without local presence? It's worth noting that Facebook and LinkedIn are two counter examples in how to build local interest graphs. Facebook gives you tools for finding people and lets you decide. In LinkedIn, you see into your network to connect to others. I find LinkedIn is uncommonly good at suggesting people I may already know or want to be connected to.
Image
+1'd post by Suw Charman-AndersonJon Pincus yet again hit the nail on the head.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas PowerThe Identity Ecosystem (TIE) is posh for Big Brother.
Image
+1'd post by Max Hodgestemp file
Image
+1'd post by LD WilliamsDoes anyone know of a way (of an app) whereby I can list All the posts that I have replied to or in? As quite often there is a discussion ongoing that I've made a comment in and then think of something else to add to it , it then takes me forever to find that persons post again! I would prefer this to be done auto, eg no extra posting on my behalf as I reply to quite a lot of posts in a short time and then often come back to them later on.
Image
+1'd post by Jack Schofield
Image
+1'd post by Chris LoftIstanbul
Image
+1'd post by Huy ZingGoogle+ forced my hand by changing its layout again. I worked non-stop for the past 15 hours integrating my 80%-done SDK into the G+me extension. The latest G+me v6.0.2 is out for Chrome 12+. To update immediately: http://goo.gl/C0n0J Thanks for your patience. This delay shouldn't happen again. You shouldn't notice anything different, but the foundation is now there for automatic self-healing. It's still not fully resistant to Google+'s layout changes, but I'm hoping in a few days it will be. There may be bugs so please report back And then the SDK can be shared with other extension developers, not only making extensions more robust but also making it much easier for more innovation to come on top of Google+
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewNow that is a bike.
Image
+1'd post by Tom SteinbergReally happy to tell you that FixMyTransport is now public - mySociety's attempt to push the boundaries of what web apps can do to foster real-world change. It's brand new, so please tell us what we can improve!
Image
+1'd post by Julien Baylethanks a lot to +Miriam Clinton (iriXx)
Image
+1'd post by Nik ButlerSo I dont need to follow back someone in order for them to share something with me .... Do you know what we call that in the rest of social networking ? SPAM ! I rarely post here ... because there is less right and working in Google+ than there is in twitter. I have had better engagement , conversation and tone through linked in than these fucking circles.
Image
+1'd post by Nik HurwoodC'mon! Just remembered it's Dr Who night!
Image
+1'd post by Ivan Pope+I'm Spartacus Regarding the use of 'real' names on Google+ I went to read the Terms that we operate under. The only reference in the Google+ Terms seems to be: "5.1 In order to access certain Services, you may be required to provide information about yourself (such as identification or contact details) as part of the registration process for the Service, or as part of your continued use of the Services. You agree that any registration information you give to Google will always be accurate, correct and up to date." So your registration information must be 'accurate, correct and up to date'. But it doesn't make any stipulations on what this means. I imagine lawyers would have a lot to say about this. For example, there is no legal definition of 'registration information', so to start with we don't even know what information Google wants us to put in, let alone how accurate, correct and up to date applies to that. Going to your actual Registration information in Google+, Google does refer to your name information as 'Name'. It also makes it very very simple to edit this information whenever you want. It warns that what you put in this registration form will affect other Google products, but in no way does it warn you to put any 'correct etc' name in there. What I extrapolate from this is that the Google approach to names on Google+ is arbitary and capricious and would not really carry any weight in law. So let's ignore them, the bullies that they are being.
Image
+1'd post by Kosso"The customer is always right" However, the freeloading user who'll never spend a penny will just whine on and on about anything they like regardless of actually being right or wrong.
Image
+1'd post
Image
+1'd post by Robert SchultzIf anyone is fed up with no search on G+ then please +1 this post and reshare It's ridiculous - come on, Google is a search company and like Twitter we should be able to search G+ by now. Permalink for this post https://plus.google.com/111594233816195949839/posts/h2jNxQjrVSU
Image
+1'd post by Marc CanterThank you to Mark Ramsey for turning me and my friends onto list!
Image
+1'd post by Vago DamitioI left the USA in2008 because of the rampant nationalism, greed, intolerance, and ignorance that seem to have become such a huge part of the national character. Then, as now, I'm still convinced that the majority of people in the USA are good people - the problem is that they are dominated by intolerant, ignorant, selfish haters. I've been considering going back because I miss the land, the great people, and yes, the opportunities - but man, my brush with hateful ignorance this morning makes me think things are going to hit America hard in the coming days. And, my apologies to all those good people who live in America, but frankly - America deserves the fall it is heading towards.
Image
+1'd post by Kossohttp://meta.slashdot.org/story/11/08/25/1245200/Rob-CmdrTaco-Malda-Resigns-From-Slashdot
Image
+1'd post by Dan GillmorOne of the best memories from my Silicon Valley columnist days was meeting and writing about Rob Malda (CmdrTaco) and Jeff Bates (hemos), creators of Slashdot.org. For a long time, their site's subtitle was "News for nerds, stuff that matters" -- a great description of what they were doing. Jeff recently joined Google, and today Rob announced that he's leaving Slashdot as well (see link below). (They're +Jeffrey Bates and +Rob Malda here.) Slashdot was a aggregation, for the most part, of other people's Web postings. It pulled together material, based on the decisions of Rob and Jeff and their team, from a wide variety of sources. It was eclectic in the best possible way. What made it unique, however, was the way it handled comments -- and the comments, even more than the stories to which the editors linked, were the primary content of Slashdot (and still are). With a clever and ever-improving moderation system combining human and machine intelligence, Slashdot found a way to help its audience members help and entertain each other. We all still have things to learn from the innovations of Rob, Jeff and their team.
Image
+1'd post by Ian KingEnough already with the Steve Jobs stuff, yes, the guy was a genius in our time but so many other people have done remarkable things in life.He's retired...get over it and move on.
Image
+1'd post by Don LaVangeThis is both a funny, pun-ny headline and wonderful news Monsanto is the enemy!
Image
+1'd post by Don LaVangeI find the google recommendations annoying. I've already circled them and then uncircled them -- Google should stop bugging me about it.
Image
+1'd post by Violet BlueThis weekend was not fun, thanks to Google+ - but thank you to everyone that came out in support. It means more than you know. I woke up Monday to still having an account and magically being verified, in one of the rockiest user experiences I've had of record. I hope G+ gets better. I hope this doesn't happen to me again for other reasons. I'm still considering deleting this profile as a precautionary measure - I know a number of people that have. Here's the story, and why I think Google is too big to be screwing around like this.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas Morffew
Image
+1'd post by Edd Wilder-JamesHilarious programming language humo(u)r. I was telling a friend yesterday about the first computer programming article I wrote, for which I used a manual typewriter. Being a British typewriter, it naturally had no dollar key. By way of solution I would type an S, backspace, and then a /. Related to this, check out this post from +Tuija Sonkkila — it highlights the keyboard difficulty non-English programmers often have with languages like Perl https://plus.google.com/u/0/112433429791590422068/posts/5WdBU5tAXYr
Image
+1'd post by Jon Stow
Image
+1'd post by Joichi ItoNice. Apparently getting some traction in Harajuku. via +Ryuji AKIBA
Image
+1'd post by David BlanarInteresting.
Image
+1'd post by Tim Brennan
Image
+1'd post by Daniel Salters
Image
+1'd post
Image
+1'd post by Dare ObasanjoUnfortunately, it is well deserved.
Image
+1'd post by KossoAn Open Letter to David Cameron's Parents "What I am doing, .. is expressing shock and dismay that your son and his friends feel themselves in any way to be guardians of morality in this country" Great stuff. Well said.
Image
+1'd post by Thomas MorffewBehind you!
Image
+1'd post by John LewisTaped after the initial riot. Full of so much truth and honesty. http://youtu.be/Zmo8DG1gno4